


Moderator: Zaxxon
Fine with me. I'll be flying anyway.Unagi wrote:stessier, I think we pull back here and let the temple figure things out for themselves.
Let's watch and listen to them discuss who should be next for a bit.
You're basing everything off of one vote?Scoop20906 wrote:My thoughts:
Lassr
Newcastle
pr0ner
RevHempus71
Scoop20906 = Priest
Unagi = Sword of Ehud
stessier = Mason
Zurai = Bracers of Endor
I showed everything I could find here.Newcastle wrote: 1. Stessier - when you go through the mason forums do you get a sense...
Stessier, its called analysis. I was just showing the last vote to help us get a gauge on what people have done. I'm not Grund or Chaosraven. Turn into a mentalist if you want a beginning to end list from them.stessier wrote:You're basing everything off of one vote?Scoop20906 wrote:My thoughts:
Lassr
Newcastle
pr0ner
RevHempus71
Scoop20906 = Priest
Unagi = Sword of Ehud
stessier = Mason
Zurai = Bracers of Endor
Here's your time to shine Scoop! We are all listening quite intently. Give us all your notes and reasons. Really dig in and show us the bedrock of your beliefs. I'm Dr. Stessier, and I'm listening...
This will have to wait until tomorrow, lots of things to do. THANKSUnagi wrote:Scoop, just so we can all have a chance to trust Newcastle... could you point out where you've been saying that you trust him? Also - if those posts don't do it, could you explain why (for instance) you trust him, but not Lassr or Rev. I'm also interested in your position on pr0ner too. You seem to give him a little bit of a nod too...
With someone as normally 'involved' as Newcastle to be this abscent for this long - and with No Role, I am a little alarmed that you just brush him off.
That's fine, please take your time with this.Scoop20906 wrote:This will have to wait until tomorrow, lots of things to do. THANKSUnagi wrote:Scoop, just so we can all have a chance to trust Newcastle... could you point out where you've been saying that you trust him? Also - if those posts don't do it, could you explain why (for instance) you trust him, but not Lassr or Rev. I'm also interested in your position on pr0ner too. You seem to give him a little bit of a nod too...
With someone as normally 'involved' as Newcastle to be this abscent for this long - and with No Role, I am a little alarmed that you just brush him off.
Your assessment is correct, Unagi. I think my trust of Newcastle is mainly based on my lack of trust of the others and a gut feeling. Newcastle's post have been mainly of moderation. When I had my "fit", it was Newcastle's vote that set me off but it wasn't Newcastle himself that was the reason. I was just frustrated.Unagi wrote:That's fine, please take your time with this.Scoop20906 wrote:This will have to wait until tomorrow, lots of things to do. THANKSUnagi wrote:Scoop, just so we can all have a chance to trust Newcastle... could you point out where you've been saying that you trust him? Also - if those posts don't do it, could you explain why (for instance) you trust him, but not Lassr or Rev. I'm also interested in your position on pr0ner too. You seem to give him a little bit of a nod too...
With someone as normally 'involved' as Newcastle to be this abscent for this long - and with No Role, I am a little alarmed that you just brush him off.
Just a heads up.
I did a search on posts by you that mention the word: Newcastle.
All I saw was your very recent mention of him. Really, other than that - you two had a very brief exchange way back on Day 1 when you had your little fit. Newcastle was one player that was willing to vote for you while that was going on. Almost everyone else was fixated on Grund, Remus, and I.
It's interesting.
You've never once been suspicious of him this whole game, but everyone here that has played with him (and you have) has found his game a little concerning. You have voiced with a nice degree of drama how totally important it is that we proceed with care, and yet you treat Newcastle like he's even got posts to build trust on. He doesn't. Newcastle is truly Whocastle in this game, but you have him figured as Good-Guy.
Why?.... because I am innocent. Going with the flow..... I believe the trusted know I have not been going with the flow. I feel I have been more participatory and have used real reasoning to make my own decisions. Yes, before you try to confuse things, I did ask Unagi who to vote for in the thread. However I am sure he recognized it as a rhetorical question. Simple I felt that we are at the point that both badguys can't afford to be on the same vote. So that being said.... The only non Remus votes were YOU, me, Zurai(trusted), and Sean(trusted). Newcastle... or shall I call you Balaam..... what you got to say about that??4. Rev - Grund seemed to have trusted him enough to PM him on the night he died. Why? Rev also has been playing a relatively safe game I think. He has been playing kind of an aw shucks game. In that he seems to have gone with the flow of things.
First off... I wasn't timid on the Remus vote. I had him in my mostly trusted file and thus did not want to vote for him. I beieve I said that more than once. Yes, I asked a lot of questions and you all gave the trusted players much to read. Saying I was a LOT more active in past games is a bad charcterization of me. Past games I posted more often but it was mostly BS pothead stuff nothing really pertaining to the game at hand. Last, I find it hard to believe I have been less noticeable since I have been on everyones suspect list at some point in time. Lassr back to you.....RevHempus71:
He was very timid on the Remus vote. Asked a lot of questions but never voted for Remus.
He has been a LOT more active in the others games he's played. LIttle less noticeable in this game.I know these are quick and short.
Huh..... Pr0ner ..... I am leaning towards his priestlyness.......
First... thanks for the compliment. Second... assume ... we know what happens when one assumes anything. Last, no worries mate, I am innocent.RevHempus71 - I can't read Rev. He is incredibly good at playing his part consistently. When you can't read someone, you can assume the worst. I don't want to get beat by him if he is Legion.
Seriously, do you guys all live in the same house and share one computer and just sit around figuring out way to fuck with me?Unagi wrote:Scoop.RevHempus71 wrote:From my knowledge of my innocence that leaves:
Lassr:
Proner:
Scoop#:
Newcastle:
Of these 4 players we who would likely convert Chaos?
Check it out.
Thank you. Less active means you were less active whether it was serious posts or pot jokes. It's a change in behavior, that's what I noticed. Whether less jokes about pot means anything I don't know. But you were so sure about Remus being innocent, when the majority of us were sure he was guilty. What did you see that we did not see? (the bad guy forums?)RevHempus71 wrote:First off... I wasn't timid on the Remus vote. I had him in my mostly trusted file and thus did not want to vote for him. I beieve I said that more than once. Yes, I asked a lot of questions and you all gave the trusted players much to read. Saying I was a LOT more active in past games is a bad charcterization of me. Past games I posted more often but it was mostly BS pothead stuff nothing really pertaining to the game at hand. Last, I find it hard to believe I have been less noticeable since I have been on everyones suspect list at some point in time. Lassr back to you.....RevHempus71:
He was very timid on the Remus vote. Asked a lot of questions but never voted for Remus.
He has been a LOT more active in the others games he's played. LIttle less noticeable in this game.I know these are quick and short.
Lassr I didn't see anything in particular. It was just a gut reaction to his posts. They didn't feel all that thought out to me. I think a badguy Remus would have been more careful in his reactions to people. He was very pokey in his posts. All of them felt like info attempts not misdirection. Goodguys use info, badguys use misdirection. Most of all I thought a bad Remus would kill Chaos not convert him.Lassr wrote:Thank you. Less active means you were less active whether it was serious posts or pot jokes. It's a change in behavior, that's what I noticed. Whether less jokes about pot means anything I don't know. But you were so sure about Remus being innocent, when the majority of us were sure he was guilty. What did you see that we did not see? (the bad guy forums?)RevHempus71 wrote:First off... I wasn't timid on the Remus vote. I had him in my mostly trusted file and thus did not want to vote for him. I beieve I said that more than once. Yes, I asked a lot of questions and you all gave the trusted players much to read. Saying I was a LOT more active in past games is a bad charcterization of me. Past games I posted more often but it was mostly BS pothead stuff nothing really pertaining to the game at hand. Last, I find it hard to believe I have been less noticeable since I have been on everyones suspect list at some point in time. Lassr back to you.....RevHempus71:
He was very timid on the Remus vote. Asked a lot of questions but never voted for Remus.
He has been a LOT more active in the others games he's played. LIttle less noticeable in this game.I know these are quick and short.
Unagi, you were supposed to leave that for the real badguys to point at.....Unagi wrote:Scoop.RevHempus71 wrote:From my knowledge of my innocence that leaves:
Lassr:
Proner:
Scoop#:
Newcastle:
Of these 4 players we who would likely convert Chaos?
Check it out.
No Scoop we don't live in the same house or share the same computer. However, fucking with you is kind of fun.......Scoop20906 wrote:Seriously, do you guys all live in the same house and share one computer and just sit around figuring out way to fuck with me?Unagi wrote:Scoop.RevHempus71 wrote:From my knowledge of my innocence that leaves:
Lassr:
Proner:
Scoop#:
Newcastle:
Of these 4 players we who would likely convert Chaos?
Check it out.
Yeah, that seems to be a common theme in my life.RevHempus71 wrote:No Scoop we don't live in the same house or share the same computer. However, fucking with you is kind of fun.......Scoop20906 wrote:Seriously, do you guys all live in the same house and share one computer and just sit around figuring out way to fuck with me?Unagi wrote:Scoop.RevHempus71 wrote:From my knowledge of my innocence that leaves:
Lassr:
Proner:
Scoop#:
Newcastle:
Of these 4 players we who would likely convert Chaos?
Check it out.![]()
All jokes aside Rev... You truly would be my number 1 pick of a person likely to convert Chaos.RevHempus71 wrote:No Scoop we don't live in the same house or share the same computer. However, fucking with you is kind of fun.......Scoop20906 wrote:Seriously, do you guys all live in the same house and share one computer and just sit around figuring out way to fuck with me?Unagi wrote:Scoop.RevHempus71 wrote:From my knowledge of my innocence that leaves:
Lassr:
Proner:
Scoop#:
Newcastle:
Of these 4 players we who would likely convert Chaos?
Check it out.![]()