Re: [Health] The Infectious Diseases Thread
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 7:35 pm
Me and my wife lived this way for a decade and a half nearly. I thumb my nose at cabin fever.
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
The way I look at it is we humans are creatures of habit. What is a 'comfort zone' if not simply a set of habits? Psychologically it's good for us. That's why a disaster which disrupts our habits can be so stressful. If someone is used to dropping the kids off at school, then going to work, and one day they can do neither, that is going to stress them out. The loss of the job and the fact they now have their kids home all day are added stresses piled on to the disruption of their daily habits.Daehawk wrote: Thu Mar 26, 2020 7:35 pm Me and my wife lived this way for a decade and a half nearly. I thumb my nose at cabin fever.
Drag his ass back, please.Ralph-Wiggum wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2020 9:33 am He doesn’t post on here much anymore, but Captain Caveman has a good chance at being the first OOer with it.
A man suspected of planning to attack a hospital treating coronavirus cases in the US state of Missouri died after a shootout with the FBI, officials say.
Right now there isn't the infrastructure for that kind of testing. Maybe in the near future but how not how. And if false negatives continue to be an issue maybe not even then.Daehawk wrote: Thu Mar 26, 2020 11:02 pm Can they legally keep you out? What if you both took tests and were negative?
That seems rather draconian.msteelers wrote: Thu Mar 26, 2020 10:13 pm They ... wouldn’t even let my wife Skype me from the office.
Some offices are letting the mothers video conference the father. My friend is in the hospital right now with his wife giving birth to their first child. He was able to FaceTime in to the last few appointments.
New doctor maybe? This is a one in a lifetime thing for you. Ya other kids and all but this is this one. "Sorry hon wasn't there for your birth. No idea how it went. Didn't see you for a week or more" Thats not fair.msteelers wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 7:40 amSome offices are letting the mothers video conference the father. My friend is in the hospital right now with his wife giving birth to their first child. He was able to FaceTime in to the last few appointments.
I think what made our particular issue worse is I called the Dr’s office the day before and specifically asked if Skype would be an issue. They said it would not be an issue, and even said we could log in to their WiFi. But when my wife got there, they shot her down and acted like she was crazy. They also didn’t give any reason outside of saying “its for our safety”.
I would be VERY careful about "volunteering" for your old job while collecting unemployment. The unemployment office might consider that fraud.Paingod wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 10:01 am My number's been drawn for the dead pool. Today is my last day, tomorrow I'm officially laid off.
Given that my employers are keeping only another 6 people employed, and for how long no one can say, this isn't a shock to me. I'm planning to call the unemployment office today and let them know. I've also talked with my employer and asked if I could be retained as a "volunteer" to work remotely as needed. I don't have a lot of plans to leave the house and 99% of my job can be done remotely... it's just that with only 6 people on staff instead of 55, there's nothing to keep me busy aside from routine maintenance (which accounts only for a modest portion of my job).
So I'll be "employed" with no salary, working 2-6 hours per week with no pay, collecting unemployment, and home-schooling the kids so my wife can concentrate on her work. I want to support the business I work for and help them stay afloat. I don't see this as a vacation, but rather an extraordinary circumstance that no one can avoid.
They're currently "tentatively" planning to re-open in two weeks, depending on circumstance. I expect that circumstance will last a lot longer.
I will, but I'd like to think that in this extraordinary time of unusual circumstance, helping my employer have the best shot of coming back to life so I can get off unemployment sooner would be a good thing.Punisher wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 10:44 amI would be VERY careful about "volunteering" for your old job while collecting unemployment. The unemployment office might consider that fraud.
You might want to ask them.
I can see how it might be seen that way. I'm looking at the future of my employment with the same company that's laying me off. I don't see a reason to refuse small tasks or questions; I'm the only one in my department and the only one with the inside-out knowledge of the systems. I do have documentation of the network and a list of vendors they can utilize for anything that gets out of hand, though. I won't be coming in to work a full day or on weekends at no cost. I'm talking about maybe a few 5 minute phone calls each week, so the people I've worked with for the last 3 years who have depended on me know they still can. There is seriously VERY little for me to do without users to support. There's not a lot of room to exploit anything.Smoove_B wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 10:54 amI cannot imagine a scenario where my employer would put me through a layoff and then I'd volunteer my time back to them in order for them to continue to operate. That seems potentially abusive. Regardless, I'm sorry to hear it and hope your transition to unemployment is painless.
This shows the location data of phones that were on a Florida beach during Spring Break. It then shows where those phones traveled.
First thing you should note is the importance of social distancing. The second is how much data your phone gives off.
I can't remember if it is Singapore, Taiwan, or Hong Kong, but one of them is tracking and shows up at your house if the tracker fails for some reason to verify you are still in quarantine.Max Peck wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 11:58 am There has been talk of using that sort of cellphone data to verify that people are complying with self-quarantine/distancing orders, but I don't know if any jurisdiction anywhere has actually gone ahead with it yet.
Some other countries have done it:Max Peck wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 11:58 am There has been talk of using that sort of cellphone data to verify that people are complying with self-quarantine/distancing orders, but I don't know if any jurisdiction anywhere has actually gone ahead with it yet.
Taiwan, I think (the guy's battery died).stessier wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 12:32 pmI can't remember if it is Singapore, Taiwan, or Hong Kong, but one of them is tracking and shows up at your house if the tracker fails for some reason to verify you are still in quarantine.Max Peck wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 11:58 am There has been talk of using that sort of cellphone data to verify that people are complying with self-quarantine/distancing orders, but I don't know if any jurisdiction anywhere has actually gone ahead with it yet.
He predicted Israel to have less than 10 death. One week later, it is now at 12 death.Anonymous Bosch wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:54 pmSo what? You're free to believe whatever you like. But Levitt's forecast of Chinese deaths from COVID-19 was pretty damn accurate, so one can but hope his prediction of slowed growth in other nations also holds up.malchior wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:41 pmBiophysicist. Not a Medical Doctor. Not an epidemiologist. Not an expert in that field at all. Why listen to the experts when we can find an expert in something else that says what we want to believe and lean on those credentials. That is solid science.Anonymous Bosch wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:28 pmYeah, I'm sure your forecast of Chinese coronavirus fatalities was much more accurate than that of a Nobel laureate and Stanford biophysicist "boy."![]()
The cashier in the Chinese market a couple of days ago wore a mask, and put on gloves before handling our purchase, plus she had a table in front of the counter with the register (forcing people back an extra three feet from her.) She's the only one I've ever seen there, and she's staying open during all of this. I don't blame her for the mask.Daehawk wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 12:12 pm A local health guy was talking about how he went into a convenience store to get something and the clerk had on a mask and gloves. He said how much you want to bet in this crisis thats her only ones of each or at least a limited amount. She probably wearing them all day....maybe even a few days or a week long. Imagine that when she hands you your credit card back or bags your items.
When making these kinds of decisions I look at it from the other side's perspective. If I'm the employer and the employee is willing to work even part of their job for free, why am I paying them? So when things get back to 'normal' now I know they are willing to do things for free, thereby giving me the leverage to reduce labor costs. That's the reason why I would think twice about it. Don't do it thinking you're going to impress them or are showing them what an amazing employee you are. I mean they MIGHT feel that way, but most employers are looking at the bottomline first and foremost. That's when the economy is good. This year the economy is shot, the bottomline is going to be all anyone thinks about.Paingod wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 11:14 amI can see how it might be seen that way. I'm looking at the future of my employment with the same company that's laying me off. I don't see a reason to refuse small tasks or questionsSmoove_B wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 10:54 amI cannot imagine a scenario where my employer would put me through a layoff and then I'd volunteer my time back to them in order for them to continue to operate. That seems potentially abusive. Regardless, I'm sorry to hear it and hope your transition to unemployment is painless.
This is an extraordinary circumstance. Most employers won't view what an employee does right now as typical market behavior. Any employer who thinks that the goodwill shown by employees during this (or any) crisis is suddenly a standard is crazy.gameoverman wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 4:06 pmWhen making these kinds of decisions I look at it from the other side's perspective. If I'm the employer and the employee is willing to work even part of their job for free, why am I paying them? So when things get back to 'normal' now I know they are willing to do things for free, thereby giving me the leverage to reduce labor costs. That's the reason why I would think twice about it. Don't do it thinking you're going to impress them or are showing them what an amazing employee you are. I mean they MIGHT feel that way, but most employers are looking at the bottomline first and foremost. That's when the economy is good. This year the economy is shot, the bottomline is going to be all anyone thinks about.Paingod wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 11:14 amI can see how it might be seen that way. I'm looking at the future of my employment with the same company that's laying me off. I don't see a reason to refuse small tasks or questionsSmoove_B wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 10:54 amI cannot imagine a scenario where my employer would put me through a layoff and then I'd volunteer my time back to them in order for them to continue to operate. That seems potentially abusive. Regardless, I'm sorry to hear it and hope your transition to unemployment is painless.
Sure. But if the employer is keeping X amount of employees on the job and they are getting paid then the employer has made a decision on who is needed and who isn't. For instance, for survival purposes, they might have elected to keep more employees at work but paid them all a smaller percentage of their normal pay. That way they all pull together to survive this but no one is expected to work for free. My previous experiences with employers who took advantage of helpful employees is why I'm wary of this kind of thing. Others may work for better employers and so won't have this problem.LawBeefaroni wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 4:13 pmSimilarly, layoffs right now aren't cost cutting measures so much as they are survival measures.gameoverman wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 4:06 pmWhen making these kinds of decisions I look at it from the other side's perspective. If I'm the employer and the employee is willing to work even part of their job for free, why am I paying them? So when things get back to 'normal' now I know they are willing to do things for free, thereby giving me the leverage to reduce labor costs. That's the reason why I would think twice about it. Don't do it thinking you're going to impress them or are showing them what an amazing employee you are. I mean they MIGHT feel that way, but most employers are looking at the bottomline first and foremost. That's when the economy is good. This year the economy is shot, the bottomline is going to be all anyone thinks about.Paingod wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 11:14 amI can see how it might be seen that way. I'm looking at the future of my employment with the same company that's laying me off. I don't see a reason to refuse small tasks or questionsSmoove_B wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 10:54 amI cannot imagine a scenario where my employer would put me through a layoff and then I'd volunteer my time back to them in order for them to continue to operate. That seems potentially abusive. Regardless, I'm sorry to hear it and hope your transition to unemployment is painless.
SpartanNash grocery stores here have put up sneeze guards between cashiers and customers.Blackhawk wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 1:21 pmThe cashier in the Chinese market a couple of days ago wore a mask, and put on gloves before handling our purchase, plus she had a table in front of the counter with the register (forcing people back an extra three feet from her.) She's the only one I've ever seen there, and she's staying open during all of this. I don't blame her for the mask.Daehawk wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 12:12 pm A local health guy was talking about how he went into a convenience store to get something and the clerk had on a mask and gloves. He said how much you want to bet in this crisis thats her only ones of each or at least a limited amount. She probably wearing them all day....maybe even a few days or a week long. Imagine that when she hands you your credit card back or bags your items.
Or they make shitty bread. Since bread seems to be among the hoarding items (why? It lasts like a week!), they must be making pretty bad bread if incentives are required.
A bakery here has been doing that too when you buy a dozen pastries.Daehawk wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 5:55 pm A place here called Bite Me Bakery is offering a free roll of toilet paper when you buy a loaf of bread. Thats got to be one of the strangest incentives to buy Ive seen in my life.
The VC and NVA could not kill you, what chance does a little virus from China have? Not much!dbt1949 wrote: Wed Mar 25, 2020 4:23 pm Chances are if I caught it I wouldn't do anything about it either. Just tough it thru or die.
They can't do anything about it now except try to ease the symptoms and make you comfortable.
My wife would catch it too and we'd do the same thing for her except stop her care nurse from coming over.