Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
Moderators: LawBeefaroni, $iljanus
- YellowKing
- Posts: 31158
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:02 pm
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
At the risk of beating a dead horse, the NC GOP is among the most corrupt in the entire country. I really can't stress enough how horrible they are.
- Pyperkub
- Posts: 24213
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:07 pm
- Location: NC- that's Northern California
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
Yeah, the thing is that over the past couple of decades, these states level shenanigans get rolled out to every other state and attempts to make them federal are the norm.YellowKing wrote:At the risk of beating a dead horse, the NC GOP is among the most corrupt in the entire country. I really can't stress enough how horrible they are.
There's a cartoonish level of villainy at play which would be funny if it weren't so serious.
Sent from my SM-S908U1 using Tapatalk
Black Lives definitely Matter Lorini!
Also: There are three ways to not tell the truth: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
Also: There are three ways to not tell the truth: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
- LordMortis
- Posts: 71754
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
That was MI. I would like to believe we are moving away from it, albeit slowly, too slowly for my comfort. Or maybe we're just on a much slower train than OH and WI nowadays, it looks like we're moving away.
- Pyperkub
- Posts: 24213
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:07 pm
- Location: NC- that's Northern California
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
It is who the GOP currently is...
Pillen, a Republican who took office in 2023, was later asked about the article’s findings during a September interview with Nebraska radio station KFAB, the New York Times reported.
When asked to comment on the piece, Pillen responded: “Number one, I didn’t read it and I won’t … Number two, all you’ve got to do is look at the author. [The] author’s from Communist China. What more do you need to know?”
Black Lives definitely Matter Lorini!
Also: There are three ways to not tell the truth: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
Also: There are three ways to not tell the truth: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
- GreenGoo
- Posts: 43061
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
- Location: Ottawa, ON
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
We hear you. Just fyi. No one is ignoring you when you say thisYellowKing wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2023 5:31 pm At the risk of beating a dead horse, the NC GOP is among the most corrupt in the entire country. I really can't stress enough how horrible they are.
- YellowKing
- Posts: 31158
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:02 pm
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
Haha I know, I just love being proven right yet again when another example of their awfulness shows up.
- Grifman
- Posts: 21970
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:17 pm
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
"We're gonna deport a lot of people, 10 million people and growing - anchor babies, their parents, their grandparents. We're gonna put kids in cages. It's gonna be glorious."
https://x.com/highbrow_nobrow/status/17 ... NcXCfN8s1g
https://x.com/highbrow_nobrow/status/17 ... NcXCfN8s1g
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions. – G.K. Chesterton
-
- Posts: 24795
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
Sigh. Going meta here but @Grifman I don't know if you realize you understand that this posting behavior is giving people the grumps. You took offense the last time someone pointed it out yet you persist. As told to you repeatedly by multiple members please take the 5 seconds to change x.com to twitter.com so the forum software can render the message. People don't want to click into blind links. It isn't hard. I don't get it. It seems willful at this point.
I say this because the post is pretty useful but people are going to ignore it in the form it is. That seems like a complete waste of good curation.
Edit: Not trying to be too harsh but instead raise attention that I think this point has been made at least 3 or 4 times at this point. It isn't even something I have much issue with but I know several others do.
I say this because the post is pretty useful but people are going to ignore it in the form it is. That seems like a complete waste of good curation.
Edit: Not trying to be too harsh but instead raise attention that I think this point has been made at least 3 or 4 times at this point. It isn't even something I have much issue with but I know several others do.
- LawBeefaroni
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 56031
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
- Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
A lot of my friends, colleagues, and neighbors. They enrich my life. Mike Davis doesn't. He can get fucked. Article III is such a transparent grift.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
- Daehawk
- Posts: 65728
- Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:11 am
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
--------------------------------------------
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
When in doubt, skewer it out...I don't know.
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
When in doubt, skewer it out...I don't know.
- Blackhawk
- Posts: 46066
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
- Location: Southwest Indiana
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
Last edited by Blackhawk on Sun Oct 29, 2023 5:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
What doesn't kill me makes me stranger.
- LordMortis
- Posts: 71754
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
Given I have both ad block and a FB fence add on my browser, I assumed it was me and I was OK with that.
- Kraken
- Posts: 45091
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: The Hub of the Universe
- Contact:
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
+1LordMortis wrote: ↑Sun Oct 29, 2023 4:16 pm Given I have both ad block and a FB fence add on my browser, I assumed it was me and I was OK with that.
- hepcat
- Posts: 54119
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
malchior wrote: ↑Sat Oct 28, 2023 11:20 am Sigh. Going meta here but @Grifman I don't know if you realize you understand that this posting behavior is giving people the grumps. You took offense the last time someone pointed it out yet you persist. As told to you repeatedly by multiple members please take the 5 seconds to change x.com to twitter.com so the forum software can render the message. People don't want to click into blind links. It isn't hard. I don't get it. It seems willful at this point.
I say this because the post is pretty useful but people are going to ignore it in the form it is. That seems like a complete waste of good curation.
Edit: Not trying to be too harsh but instead raise attention that I think this point has been made at least 3 or 4 times at this point. It isn't even something I have much issue with but I know several others do.
Just an aside, I've also been chastised for not including the actual content of tweets in a separate quote box too, so that people who are using something that doesn't allow for inline media such as tweets or whatever can see what's being posted. I don't do it all the time (and neither do you or quite a few other folks, it seems), but I figure if we're trying to establish some protocols here and then point out when someone doesn't follow them, we should add that to the list.
Master of his domain.
- Unagi
- Posts: 28231
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
- Location: Chicago
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
That is a strawman
- GreenGoo
- Posts: 43061
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
- Location: Ottawa, ON
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
+1LordMortis wrote: ↑Sun Oct 29, 2023 4:16 pm Given I have both ad block and a FB fence add on my browser, I assumed it was me and I was OK with that.
- hepcat
- Posts: 54119
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
You posted that right after my post. We're you referring to the video, my reply or something else?
Master of his domain.
- Unagi
- Posts: 28231
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
- Location: Chicago
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
Your reply.
First, let me defend Grifman a little bit here myself, just in that I saw Grifman make attempts to edit the x.com domain into a twitter.com domain in a number of posts, but I think it's just not in his natural way of posting to then edit his posts. All I can ask is that he provides the edit, and if he doesn't do it, I will likely "sigh", and then provide the edit myself. I'm not interested in issuing a 'forum ticket' or anything, I simply want to just read the twitter post in line with reading the forum and not have to click on the link. It's that simple.
That aside, and back to you and malchior's post... and my "Strawman" comment.
What is generally being asked is just that the x.com domain be edited into a twitter.com domain. It's a simple edit of one's own post. Let's call it 'the bare minimum beyond doing nothing'.
You then say that: "Well, if we are going to demand that everyone share Twitter posts in the absolutely best way, we should also add to the list that people go into the Twitter posts and cut-n-paste the contents of that Twitter post and include that also as an alternate"
But your goal is not to have that added to the list (as you say), it's that you want the whole thing struck down, and you offer up the "Everyone should have to also quote the Twitter text." as a strawman.
Unless you are trying to say you really sincerely do want everyone to do that with every Twitter post and you think it's equivalent. I can't imagine that's the case, but hey - maybe you do feel strongly about that.
- Scraper
- Posts: 2968
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 4:59 pm
- Unagi
- Posts: 28231
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
- Location: Chicago
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
Oh, we will survive.
It's Okay.
The 21st-century Republican Party will still be here when we collect ourselves.
It's Okay.
The 21st-century Republican Party will still be here when we collect ourselves.
- hepcat
- Posts: 54119
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
JFC, I actually didn't think it was a big effing deal that Grifman is posting it that way. I was more or less trying to say that there really are multiple complaints about how things should be formatted and I was making a (apparently) less than obvious comment that we all do it wrong in someone' else's opinion.
But I guess I shouldn't be surprised at your subsequent long reply detailing why I'm a dick.
But I guess I shouldn't be surprised at your subsequent long reply detailing why I'm a dick.
Master of his domain.
- Unagi
- Posts: 28231
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
- Location: Chicago
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
wow.
I'm not saying you are a dick. I said you provided a strawman.
I'm sorry you took it that way, and so I'm sorry I even said a thing about it. I should probably have just let malchior reply and stayed out of it, my fault.
Everyone - please post however the fuck you want. Sincerely.
I'm not saying you are a dick. I said you provided a strawman.
I'm sorry you took it that way, and so I'm sorry I even said a thing about it. I should probably have just let malchior reply and stayed out of it, my fault.
Everyone - please post however the fuck you want. Sincerely.
- Isgrimnur
- Posts: 84922
- Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Chookity pok
- Contact:
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
An alternate venue for the video in question.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
- Carpet_pissr
- Posts: 20793
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
- Location: Columbia, SC
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
Not JUST a formatting issue...some of us simply don't want to click on and thus support an X link due to the late unpleasantness, if you will.
I'm not going to chastise anyone that does so, I 'm just not going to read/click it. No harm, no foul.
Is my position ludicrous in the face of the millions+ clicking X links everyday? Of COURSE it is, but I'm pretty hard core anti-social media in general these days, but the X situation is pretty much due to a meaningless, silent protest against Musk and what he's trying to do/done with Twitter.
Thinking further, however, if his end goal is to kill it (I've said as much here, a few times, even right after he bought it), I should be clicking like mad on links I guess.
I'm not going to chastise anyone that does so, I 'm just not going to read/click it. No harm, no foul.
Is my position ludicrous in the face of the millions+ clicking X links everyday? Of COURSE it is, but I'm pretty hard core anti-social media in general these days, but the X situation is pretty much due to a meaningless, silent protest against Musk and what he's trying to do/done with Twitter.
Thinking further, however, if his end goal is to kill it (I've said as much here, a few times, even right after he bought it), I should be clicking like mad on links I guess.
- LordMortis
- Posts: 71754
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
+1. People gonna do what people gonna do. We can state our preferred etiquette and then move on. I will or will not be bothered to click through based on my curiosity overcoming my desire to 1) be lazy and 2) not want give my eyes and clicks to Twitter. Things can be left without comment or context or quote. If there is just a link with nothing else the odds of me clicking through are nada. No biggie. And yeah, I know not getting my one click isn't changing things but, meh. Just consider one alternative to not following the etiquette plead for by someone out there is not making the effort to post at all.Carpet_pissr wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 12:38 pm I'm not going to chastise anyone that does so, I 'm just not going to read/click it. No harm, no foul.
- Blackhawk
- Posts: 46066
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
- Location: Southwest Indiana
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
It's not a big deal, but I think that 90% of people are just going ignore the posts completely, especially if there is no discussion/commentary added.
Hell, it's not like I follow, fully read, or watch every single link. I glance at it, decide if I want to know more, and then choose whether to invest my time.
A drive-by link post needs some context. If there is no accompanying comments, and the embed itself is not visible, then the entire post is just a string of random characters, and we're expected to commit to the topic and content before we even know what it is.
After all, if the poster didn't care enough to put any effort into making the post, why would I put effort into reading it? I'm not doing that, and I suspect that few others do, either.
Like I said, it's not a big deal, but it is a complete waste of the poster's time.
Hell, it's not like I follow, fully read, or watch every single link. I glance at it, decide if I want to know more, and then choose whether to invest my time.
A drive-by link post needs some context. If there is no accompanying comments, and the embed itself is not visible, then the entire post is just a string of random characters, and we're expected to commit to the topic and content before we even know what it is.
After all, if the poster didn't care enough to put any effort into making the post, why would I put effort into reading it? I'm not doing that, and I suspect that few others do, either.
Like I said, it's not a big deal, but it is a complete waste of the poster's time.
What doesn't kill me makes me stranger.
- Kraken
- Posts: 45091
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: The Hub of the Universe
- Contact:
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
Thanks, that was worth seeing and I don't click Xitter links.
- GreenGoo
- Posts: 43061
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
- Location: Ottawa, ON
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
Thanks. I mean, to each their own, but presumably people post things with the expectation or desire for some engagement. Drive-by links that don't even resolve through the forum software is not an ideal way to achieve that.
That said, to each their own. If he knows he's not going to get much or any response, and continues to post x.com links, that's life.
- Blackhawk
- Posts: 46066
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
- Location: Southwest Indiana
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
Absolutely - and that's his option - but it comes with a trade-off.
What doesn't kill me makes me stranger.
- YellowKing
- Posts: 31158
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:02 pm
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
All the links I've seen on here work fine for me. <shrug>
The only difference I've noticed in this forum lately is everyone seems to be more irritable than usual.
The only difference I've noticed in this forum lately is everyone seems to be more irritable than usual.
- Blackhawk
- Posts: 46066
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
- Location: Southwest Indiana
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
The links working isn't the issue. It's that the forum software doesn't recognize X links like it does Twitter links, and displays them as blind links as opposed to actual posts.YellowKing wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 10:38 pm All the links I've seen on here work fine for me. <shrug>
this:
https://x.com/highbrow_nobrow/status/17 ... NcXCfN8s1g
vs this:
That's an everywhere thing.The only difference I've noticed in this forum lately is everyone seems to be more irritable than usual.
What doesn't kill me makes me stranger.
- Carpet_pissr
- Posts: 20793
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
- Location: Columbia, SC
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
Truth. Irritability seems to be at peak levels here recently.
- waitingtoconnect
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 5:56 am
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
Wait till the topic of what part of North America makes the best maple syrup; then it is ON.
- Carpet_pissr
- Posts: 20793
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
- Location: Columbia, SC
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
ON as in Ontario? Let the Battle of Maple Syrup Hill begin…waitingtoconnect wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2023 4:45 am Wait till the topic of what part of North America makes the best maple syrup; then it is ON.
- YellowKing
- Posts: 31158
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:02 pm
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
And for the record, I 100% put myself in that "more irritable" group.
- Carpet_pissr
- Posts: 20793
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
- Location: Columbia, SC
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
Same. Unagi also gets a shout out here:YellowKing wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2023 8:43 am And for the record, I 100% put myself in that "more irritable" group.
Mild mannered Clark Kent has turned into a snarky attack dog.
- hepcat
- Posts: 54119
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
I, however, am a bastion of kindness. My very presence causes music in the air, a slight scent of lilacs and a feeling not unlike that of playing with a puppy on a warm spring day.
Master of his domain.
- Carpet_pissr
- Posts: 20793
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
- Location: Columbia, SC
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
You’re a closet psychopath with murder in your heart and everyone knows it.
- Blackhawk
- Posts: 46066
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
- Location: Southwest Indiana
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
I'm a calm and peaceful butterfly.
What doesn't kill me makes me stranger.
- hepcat
- Posts: 54119
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!
Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?
I forgive you, my child.Carpet_pissr wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2023 10:05 amYou’re a closet psychopath with murder in your heart and everyone knows it.
Master of his domain.