hentzau wrote:I really wasn't planning on buying into X-Wing...but...temptation...rising...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba561/ba5619f41d10f2744145f78e2e4e007158335d71" alt="Enlarge Image"
Moderators: The Preacher, $iljanus, Zaxxon
Let me know how the Solo-play is. I almost ordered it, but then I realized it was done by the guy that did Labyrinth and I decided against it. I really disliked Labyrinth and I can only see myself playing this solo.SpaceLord wrote:I just ordered a copy of Andean Abyss. malchior, did you ever get a chance to play this? I'm excited, I've heard really good things.
I'll be right over.MythicalMino wrote:Bought Cosmic Encounter and the expansions. Been wanting that game for a long time, but always changed my mind at the register. But, finally bit the bullet after boards & bits finally got it back in stock. Looking forward to playing that either this weekend or next...
I've played Labyrinth, and it's unecessarily complicated, and from everything I've read, AA fixes the issues with Labyrinth. I'm considering doing a solo AAR on BGG. If I do, I'll link it here. I'm gonna try to get this going tomorrow.baelthazar wrote:Let me know how the Solo-play is. I almost ordered it, but then I realized it was done by the guy that did Labyrinth and I decided against it. I really disliked Labyrinth and I can only see myself playing this solo.SpaceLord wrote:I just ordered a copy of Andean Abyss. malchior, did you ever get a chance to play this? I'm excited, I've heard really good things.
Wings of War is not in any way more elegant than X-Wing. Instead of sturdy cardboard movement templates, you have tiny and thin cards, the same ones you used to plan your movement. So you'd just end up moving tiny little amounts every turn, and it was really easy to accidentally shift those cards around, same with the card that was your plane.Zarathud wrote:I remember the Wings of War system as being more elegant.
Being the owner of Hornet Leader I'd be curious about your impressions of Thunderbolt Apache Leader when it comes in. I had set out to buy Hornet Leader then Thunderbolt was just released at that time and I did like the more "tactical" setting and love games that have A-10s and attack helicopters. I was put off by the negative impressions of some people (which turned out to be nitpicky after some more review reading) and bought Hornet Leader. But after watching some gameplay videos and reading more reviews I probably would have been very happy with Thunderbolt Apache Leader. Both games are a bit pricey but Hornet Leader has very well made game components and I suspect that Thunderbolt will have the same high quality. And you're getting some cool things like terrain tiles with individual counters to target as opposed to just an abstract target card! The way the game models terrain and its effects on your attack runs is pretty clever and I like the aircraft damage system. I'm sure I'll be buying this game in the future once my wallet recovers from my recent D-Day dice purchase, and Airborne In Your Pocket kickstarter purchase! Both share some rulesets yet I think are different enough where I'd be playing both.baelthazar wrote:Let me know how the Solo-play is. I almost ordered it, but then I realized it was done by the guy that did Labyrinth and I decided against it. I really disliked Labyrinth and I can only see myself playing this solo.SpaceLord wrote:I just ordered a copy of Andean Abyss. malchior, did you ever get a chance to play this? I'm excited, I've heard really good things.
I just ordered Thuderbolt: Apache Leader. I was *this* close to making it a +$100 order (for free shipping) by adding in either Hornet Leader or U-Boat Leader, but I thought that this was a crazy amount to spend without testing the system first. I had a tough time deciding between HL and Thunderbolt, but people were literally gushing over Thunderbolt and the theme appealed to me more.
I also can't wait until the Victory Point Games zombie-seige game Day of the Zeds gets its premium treatment. I'm just not willing to spend good money on a paper map, crappy cards, and chintzy chits. Should only be a few months, so I can wait!
We saw it a few Octocons ago (I think thatsteveguy brought it) and then played it at the one after we had seen it. Then LM bought it. We don't play it enough. Of course, we don't play anything enough these days.Boudreaux wrote:Tobago is fantastic, and like you I had never even heard of it. My sister got it for me for Christmas a couple years ago, and I was shocked at how good it was. Still a family favorite. There's quite a bit of subtle strategy to be discovered with a few games under your belt.
This. The theme & basic mechanics are fine, but they tacked on too many bells & whistles that just weigh down the gameplay.hentzau wrote:I do still think this is a fun game, but it does suffer from rules sprawl. The fact that folks on BGG have created flow charts to help you figure out what to do in different situations of the game is a prime indicator of this (on an adventure do this, UNLESS it's a deep jungle adventure, then you do this too, oh, and if it's a temple adventure, you don't do the adventure in a different way, oh, and if there's a villain there, you now need to do this as well.)
lawbeef?Zarathud wrote:I have the feeling playing X-Wing at Octocon may be entirely different experience than playing at GenCon. But I do expect someone to blow up with a critical failure.
Running__ | __2014: 1300.55 miles__ | __2015: 2036.13 miles__ | __2016: 1012.75 miles__ | __2017: 1105.82 miles__ | __2018: 1318.91 miles | __2019: 2000.00 miles |
It's funny you mention this today. I pulled it (original version - which I think I prefer) out to play with my 6 year old yesterday. First time I have played it in years. He wasn't really able to grasp the strategy, hell I'm not really able to grasp the strategy, it's hard to wrap your mind around it in my opinion. Chess is easy compared to Khet.stessier wrote:Khet was the most interesting - it was kind of like a game of chess with lasers! This website looks mostly broken, but the video works to give you an idea of how it is played. I'm really thinking about buying this one.
We were playing the original and that was the consensus in the 4 games I saw played as well. It's hard to think where your laser is going as well as factoring in where the opponent's is headed.coopasonic wrote:It's funny you mention this today. I pulled it (original version - which I think I prefer) out to play with my 6 year old yesterday. First time I have played it in years. He wasn't really able to grasp the strategy, hell I'm not really able to grasp the strategy, it's hard to wrap your mind around it in my opinion. Chess is easy compared to Khet.stessier wrote:Khet was the most interesting - it was kind of like a game of chess with lasers! This website looks mostly broken, but the video works to give you an idea of how it is played. I'm really thinking about buying this one.
Running__ | __2014: 1300.55 miles__ | __2015: 2036.13 miles__ | __2016: 1012.75 miles__ | __2017: 1105.82 miles__ | __2018: 1318.91 miles | __2019: 2000.00 miles |