Re: The Trump Investigation Thread
Posted: Fri May 18, 2018 10:19 am
David Asman is a Fox News/Business talking head.
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
"For political purposes" is of course completely false.Trump wrote:Reports are there was indeed at least one FBI representative implanted, for political purposes, into my campaign for president. It took place very early on, and long before the phony Russia Hoax became a “hot” Fake News story. If true - all time biggest political scandal!
It's as if the phony Russia Hoax is phony and maybe also a total hoax.Holman wrote: ↑Fri May 18, 2018 10:19 am
"For political purposes" is of course completely false.Trump wrote:Reports are there was indeed at least one FBI representative implanted, for political purposes, into my campaign for president. It took place very early on, and long before the phony Russia Hoax became a “hot” Fake News story. If true - all time biggest political scandal!
But it's nice of Trump to keep reminding us that Carter Page and Paul Manafort were on the FBI/CIA radar long before Trump's campaign even began.
There's a reason why Trump has had such a hard time finding respectable lawyers.
This could very well just be another one of Nunes idiot schemes where they leak BS information to each other to "win" a couple of news cycles.On the FBI informant who reportedly met with Trump campaign officials in the run-up to the 2016 election: “I don’t know for sure, nor does the President, that there really was [an informant],” Giuliani said. “We’re told that.”
Earlier this month, former New York City Mayor turned Donald Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani claimed that the president cannot be subpoenaed — a legal argument that flatly contradicted an argument he himself made in 1998 during the investigation of President Bill Clinton. On Friday, CNN’s Chris Cuomo asked him about the contradiction; he simply started shouting.
First, Cuomo asked him how he could make the claim that contradicted his earlier argument. “I never heard of a subpoena for the president’s person,” Giuliani argued. “Let’s distinguish between a subpoena for documents and a subpoena that takes the President out of the oval office and puts him in front of a grand jury or hearing. Can’t do it. Can’t do the second. You can’t do the first.”
When Cuomo noted that that was exactly what was going on in 1998 when was asked by Charlie Rose whether Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr could bring Clinton before a grand jury, Giuliani responded, “Oh come on. It’s not even relevent.”
Cuomo then played the clip in which Rose specifically asked Giuliani, “If the president is asked to testify, subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury and says no, not gonna do it?” and the former federal prosecutor had responded, “You gotta do it.”
As Cuomo played the clip, an angered Giuliani screamed, “That’s really unfair. What you’re doing right now is extremely unfair. It’s the reason people don’t come on this show.
John Oliver did a piece on him within the last 2 weeks. It was enlightening.Smoove_B wrote: ↑Fri May 18, 2018 3:37 pm I had so much respect for Rudy during and right after the horrific events of 9/11/2001. However, he's really transformed himself into a giant pile of human garbage since then. Or maybe he was human garbage all along and somehow managed to transcend his nature when it was needed. I guess it doesn't matter at this point.
+1. He really did an outstanding job leading after 9/11. So did Bush, in my opinion. Until Iraq.Smoove_B wrote: ↑Fri May 18, 2018 3:37 pm I had so much respect for Rudy during and right after the horrific events of 9/11/2001. However, he's really transformed himself into a giant pile of human garbage since then. Or maybe he was human garbage all along and somehow managed to transcend his nature when it was needed. I guess it doesn't matter at this point.
I give a great degree of that feeling (that a great number of us shared) to us. And the circumstances. While they both needed certain qualities to deliver what we needed - it was us that REALLY needed something and they gave it. I am reluctant to paint with too broad a brush that hue of praise upon them... but yes - their personality seemed to sufice when the shit hit the fan.GreenGoo wrote: ↑Fri May 18, 2018 6:52 pm+1. He really did an outstanding job leading after 9/11. So did Bush, in my opinion. Until Iraq.Smoove_B wrote: ↑Fri May 18, 2018 3:37 pm I had so much respect for Rudy during and right after the horrific events of 9/11/2001. However, he's really transformed himself into a giant pile of human garbage since then. Or maybe he was human garbage all along and somehow managed to transcend his nature when it was needed. I guess it doesn't matter at this point.
An unsupported theory circulating on Capitol Hill and conservative media outlets about an "informant" spying on the Trump campaign reached new heights Friday morning, as President Donald Trump tweeted about the "all time greatest political scandal."
But US officials tell CNN that the confidential intelligence source was not planted inside the campaign to provide information to investigators.
One of the officials said the informant is a US citizen, but provided no other details on the identity.
The officials say that the identity of the informant had been closely held at the highest levels of the FBI and intelligence community, and the individual has been a source for the FBI and CIA for years.
Sepiche wrote: ↑Fri May 18, 2018 8:51 pm https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/18/politics ... index.html
An unsupported theory circulating on Capitol Hill and conservative media outlets about an "informant" spying on the Trump campaign reached new heights Friday morning, as President Donald Trump tweeted about the "all time greatest political scandal."
But US officials tell CNN that the confidential intelligence source was not planted inside the campaign to provide information to investigators.
One of the officials said the informant is a US citizen, but provided no other details on the identity.
The officials say that the identity of the informant had been closely held at the highest levels of the FBI and intelligence community, and the individual has been a source for the FBI and CIA for years.
Why would you bother posting this without links/sources?Rip wrote: ↑Sat May 19, 2018 10:31 am No, not Tiffany. They used a Cambridge professor named Stefan Halper to attempt to entrap Trump people. The real kicker is that it was before the Australian diplomat conversation with Papadopoulos that supposedly started the investigation (oops). On top of that they even had one of Halpers tramps "research assistants"(Azra Turk) overtly flirt with him to try to really put the squeeze on him.
guessing this is the story: https://theintercept.com/2018/05/19/the ... -election/Kurth wrote: ↑Sat May 19, 2018 11:39 amWhy would you bother posting this without links/sources?Rip wrote: ↑Sat May 19, 2018 10:31 am No, not Tiffany. They used a Cambridge professor named Stefan Halper to attempt to entrap Trump people. The real kicker is that it was before the Australian diplomat conversation with Papadopoulos that supposedly started the investigation (oops). On top of that they even had one of Halpers tramps "research assistants"(Azra Turk) overtly flirt with him to try to really put the squeeze on him.
No evidence has surfaced publicly indicating that Halper was acting as a government informant.
https://theintercept.com/2018/05/19/the ... -election/Kurth wrote: ↑Sat May 19, 2018 11:39 amWhy would you bother posting this without links/sources?Rip wrote: ↑Sat May 19, 2018 10:31 am No, not Tiffany. They used a Cambridge professor named Stefan Halper to attempt to entrap Trump people. The real kicker is that it was before the Australian diplomat conversation with Papadopoulos that supposedly started the investigation (oops). On top of that they even had one of Halpers tramps "research assistants"(Azra Turk) overtly flirt with him to try to really put the squeeze on him.
Good attempted spin, but ultimately wrong. The professor (unnamed in WP article) met with Page before the official investigation but he was already suspected of helping the Russians (since 2013). If a suspected foreign agent is engaging with a US politician should the US intelligence agencies ignore that? Nor can they just tell the Trump campaign, since it was suspected, not yet proven.
Three months before the 2016 election, a small group gathered at Trump Tower to meet with Donald Trump Jr., the president’s eldest son. One was an Israeli specialist in social media manipulation. Another was an emissary for two wealthy Arab princes. The third was a Republican donor with a controversial past in the Middle East as a private security contractor.
The meeting was convened primarily to offer help to the Trump team, and it forged relationships between the men and Trump insiders that would develop over the coming months — past the election and well into President Trump’s first year in office, according to several people with knowledge of their encounters.
Erik Prince, the private security contractor and the former head of Blackwater, arranged the meeting, which took place on Aug. 3, 2016. The emissary, George Nader, told Donald Trump Jr. that the crown princes who led Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates were eager to help his father win election as president. The social media specialist, Joel Zamel, extolled his company’s ability to give an edge to a political campaign; by that time, the firm had already drawn up a multimillion-dollar proposal for a social media manipulation effort to help elect Mr. Trump.
tl;dr: There were several meetings, all of them (just like the Trump Tower meeting with Russians) *after* the Trump campaign had been warned that it was illegal to engage with foreign help in the election, and all of them explicitly aimed at arranging election help. The full extent of activities is still under investigation.The meetings, which have not been reported previously, are the first indication that countries other than Russia may have offered assistance to the Trump campaign in the months before the presidential election. The interactions are a focus of the investigation by Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel, who was originally tasked with examining possible Trump campaign coordination with Russia in the election.
Mr. Nader is cooperating with the inquiry, and investigators have questioned numerous witnesses in Washington, New York, Atlanta, Tel Aviv and elsewhere about what foreign help may have been pledged or accepted, and about whether any such assistance was coordinated with Russia, according to witnesses and others with knowledge of the interviews.
Mr. Fed wrote:The wheels turn slowly, friends, but make no mistake, the wheels turn.