Yeah - I just thought it was a weird distinction. Mob guys working through a shady expediter is a whole different can of tuna for me than some Apple schmuck trying to keep his bosses happy and say they are protected by armed security or whatever drama it involved.Little Raven wrote: Sun Mar 07, 2021 9:40 pmI don't think we're actually disagreeing with each other on anything but technicalities here - you seem to agree that may-issue laws invite abuse - it doesn't seem like too much more of a stretch to imagine that people who go about abusing the system do so in ways that limit their liability.
About may-issue abuse I'm also careful about it because I think it largely is a red herring. I don't find edge cases or this type of second order effect to be all that persuasive a case against something. For example, analogously the case against drug laws isn't the massive amount of bribery it incents in law enforcement. There are law design or governance issue fixes for that behavior such as the cases the DA's brought against these parties.