The Dark Knight - Fade to Black

Lagom Lite · Post by **Lagom Lite** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 5:57 am

Unagi wrote:I find it a little disingenuous that you didn't read what transpired between Brendan and I...

Got you talking, didn't it?

Unagi wrote:is he your partner Lagom?)

Anything is possible...

...

Scoop20906 wrote: Is there simply a rulez I'm unaware of (unwritten?) where no one can follow scoop's hunch/guidance and vote with him?

It's just too much fun to watch you squirm!

...

Keeping my tru1cy vote.

EDIT: Screwed up htmls

tru1cy · Post by **tru1cy** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 8:22 am

tru1cy

if this will help get the day moving to an end so be it. Alfred don't waste a scan on me as I am citizen

Mr Bubbles · Post by **Mr Bubbles** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:22 am

I can join an Isgrimnur

vote.

stessier · Post by **stessier** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:27 am

Vote Count - Act 1

Scoop acc tru1cy (1)
Lagom acc Chaos (1)
Remus acc Semaj (1)
theohall acc Mr Bubbles (1)
Semaj acc Remus (1)
Lassr acc Brendan (1)
Lagom wd Chaos (0)
Scoop wd tru1cy (0)
Scoop acc Remus (2)
Bubbles acc Chaos (1)
tru1cy acc Unagi (1)
Semaj wd Remus (1)
Semaj acc Isgrimnur (1)
Brendan acc Unagi (2)
Unagi acc Brendan (2)
Isgrimnur acc Grund (1)
Lagom acc tru1cy (1)
Chaos acc Brendan (3)
Brendan wd Unagi (1)
Brendan acc Grund (2)
Scoop wd Remus (0)
Isgrimnur wd Grund (1)
Isgrimnur acc Scoop (1)
Lassr wd Brendan (2)
Lassr acc Semaj (2)
Remus wd Semaj (1)
Remus acc Unagi (2)
Scoop acc Remus (1)
Grund acc tru1cy (2)
theohall wd Bubbles (0)
theohall acc Chaos (2)
Remus wd Unagi (1)
Remus acc Semaj (2)
tru1cy wd Unagi (0)
tru1cy acc tru1cy (3)
Lassr wd Semaj (1)
Lassr acc tru1cy (4)
Chaos wd Brendan (1)
Chaos acc tru1cy (5)
theohall wd Chaos (1)
theohall acc Isgrimnur (2)
Grund wd tru1cy (4)
Grund acc Isgrimnur (3)
Chaos wd tru1cy (3)
Chaos acc Remus (2)
Remus wd Semaj (0)
Remus acc Isgrimnur (4)
Brendan wd Grund (0)
Brendan acc tru1cy (4)
tru1cy wd tru1cy (3)
tru1cy acc Isgrimnur (5)
Remus wd Isgrimnur (4)
Remus acc Brendan (2)
Grund wd Isgrimnur (3)
Grund acc Unagi (1)
Chaos wd Remus (1)
Chaos acc tru1cy (4)
tru1cy wd Isgrimnur (2)
tru1cy acc tru1cy (5)
Bubbles wd Chaos (0)
Bubbles acc Isgrimnur (3)

Mob rule occurs at 7 votes.

Against tru1cy (5): Lagom, Lassr, Brendan, Chaos, tru1cy
Against Isgrimnur (3): Semaj, theohall, Bubbles
Against Brendan (2): Unagi, Remus
Against Remus (1): Scoop
Against Scoop (1): Isgrimnur
Against Unagi (1): Grund

No votes:

theohall · Post by **theohall** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:37 am

I'd rather kill a bad guy than someone claiming to be a just a citizen. Sticking with the vote on Isgrimnur. If I'm wrong, so what? It happens quite a bit on Day One.

Remus West · Post by **Remus West** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:26 am

Isgrimnur

Grundbegriff · Post by **Grundbegriff** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:34 am

Isgrimnur

The Big Mo!

Isgrimnur · Post by **Isgrimnur** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:36 am

Then I might as well advocate for tru1cy

to see if I can save my own hide.

Remus West · Post by **Remus West** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:41 am

Quick Unagi, vote for Isgrimnur. Then Scoop will have two players on the edge of death that he could put the kill vote on. He won't know what to do. He'll get so excited his head will explode.

Unagi · Post by **Unagi** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:42 am

Sounds like fun!

Isgrimnur

Semaj · Post by **Semaj** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:53 am

This is sadly way more amusing than it should be.

Unagi · Post by **Unagi** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 11:13 am

Semaj wrote:This is sadly way more amusing than it should be.

agreed

stessier · Post by **stessier** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 11:18 am

Vote Count - Act 1

Scoop acc tru1cy (1)
Lagom acc Chaos (1)
Remus acc Semaj (1)
theohall acc Mr Bubbles (1)
Semaj acc Remus (1)
Lassr acc Brendan (1)
Lagom wd Chaos (0)
Scoop wd tru1cy (0)
Scoop acc Remus (2)
Bubbles acc Chaos (1)
tru1cy acc Unagi (1)
Semaj wd Remus (1)
Semaj acc Isgrimnur (1)
Brendan acc Unagi (2)
Unagi acc Brendan (2)
Isgrimnur acc Grund (1)
Lagom acc tru1cy (1)
Chaos acc Brendan (3)
Brendan wd Unagi (1)
Brendan acc Grund (2)
Scoop wd Remus (0)
Isgrimnur wd Grund (1)
Isgrimnur acc Scoop (1)
Lassr wd Brendan (2)
Lassr acc Semaj (2)
Remus wd Semaj (1)
Remus acc Unagi (2)
Scoop acc Remus (1)
Grund acc tru1cy (2)
theohall wd Bubbles (0)
theohall acc Chaos (2)
Remus wd Unagi (1)
Remus acc Semaj (2)
tru1cy wd Unagi (0)
tru1cy acc tru1cy (3)
Lassr wd Semaj (1)
Lassr acc tru1cy (4)
Chaos wd Brendan (1)
Chaos acc tru1cy (5)
theohall wd Chaos (1)
theohall acc Isgrimnur (2)
Grund wd tru1cy (4)
Grund acc Isgrimnur (3)
Chaos wd tru1cy (3)
Chaos acc Remus (2)
Remus wd Semaj (0)
Remus acc Isgrimnur (4)
Brendan wd Grund (0)
Brendan acc tru1cy (4)
tru1cy wd tru1cy (3)
tru1cy acc Isgrimnur (5)
Remus wd Isgrimnur (4)
Remus acc Brendan (2)
Grund wd Isgrimnur (3)
Grund acc Unagi (1)
Chaos wd Remus (1)
Chaos acc tru1cy (4)
tru1cy wd Isgrimnur (2)
tru1cy acc tru1cy (5)
Bubbles wd Chaos (0)
Bubbles acc Isgrimnur (3)
Remus wd Brendan (1)
Remus acc Isgrimnur (4)
Grund wd Unagi (0)
Grund acc Isgrimnur (5)
Isgrimnur wd Scoop (0)
Isgrimnur acc tru1cy (6)
Unagi wd Brendan (0)
Unage acc Isgrimnur (6)

Mob rule occurs at 7 votes.

Against tru1cy (6): Lagom, Lassr, Brendan, Chaos, tru1cy, Isgrimnur
Against Isgrimnur (6): Semaj, theohall, Bubbles, Remus, Grund, Unagi
Against Remus (1): Scoop

No votes:

Grundbegriff · Post by **Grundbegriff** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 11:20 am

stessier wrote: Against tru1cy (6): Lagom, Lassr, Brendan, Chaos, tru1cy, Isgrimnur
Against Isgrimnur (6): Semaj, theohall, Bubbles, Remus, Grund, Unagi
Against Remus (1): Scoop

No votes:

Fascinating

Brendan · Post by **Brendan** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 11:29 am

Oh, Scoop - whatever will you do?!

Mr Bubbles · Post by **Mr Bubbles** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 11:29 am

Indeed. Maybe we should jump on Scoop!

Lagom Lite · Post by **Lagom Lite** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 11:48 am

tru1cy · Post by **tru1cy** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 11:49 am

isgrimnur

Sorry dude I tried...

Brendan · Post by **Brendan** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 11:51 am

tru1cy wrote: isgrimnur

Sorry dude I tried...

Interesting - unwilling to martyr yourself this time, huh?

Semaj · Post by **Semaj** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 11:55 am

Hrm

Whats it say if Isg is good? Whats it say if ISG is evl?

Could we have been splitting 2 evil guys?

Isgrimnur · Post by **Isgrimnur** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 11:55 am

Yeah, that's about what I figured would happen. Good luck in your future endeavors, you oblivious, murderous bastards. Make sure after you kill me, you get your damned mob off my freaking lawn. Maybe tomorrow you could actually, y'know, take out a bad guy.

Isgrimnur · Post by **Isgrimnur** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 11:56 am

Semaj wrote:Could we have been splitting 2 evil guys?

You weren't.

Semaj · Post by **Semaj** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 11:56 am

Give us some thoughts then Isg.... If your good they'll hold some weight... if not, just keep doing what your doing.

Isgrimnur · Post by **Isgrimnur** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 12:00 pm

While discussion is obviously needed, it seems like the strong personalities always dominate and lead. Which is great, until they end up being the evil ones or just plain wrong. Just being erudite does not make one infallible.

Do you want to reward people acting out of character? The consensus seems to be that tru1cy's silence usually keeps him alive. So what actions will you take to his newfound verbosity?

All in all, there's so much baggage and meta stuff in these games that the roles don't really matter unless someone slips up.

Lassr · Post by **Lassr** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 12:02 pm

that went fast after such a slow start.

Brendan · Post by **Brendan** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 12:04 pm

Isgrimnur wrote:Just being erudite does not make one infallible.

Wise words!

Grundbegriff · Post by **Grundbegriff** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 12:08 pm

Brendan wrote:
Isgrimnur wrote:Just being erudite does not make one infallible.
Wise words!

Indeed!

Grundbegriff · Post by **Grundbegriff** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 12:08 pm

And now we have to deal with Two Face.

tru1cy · Post by **tru1cy** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 12:41 pm

Grundbegriff wrote:And now we have to deal with Two Face.

HUH...
Isgrimnur = Rachel

Can i pull back my vote?

Isgrimnur · Post by **Isgrimnur** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 12:41 pm

:sigh: Slowest mob lynching ever.

Brendan · Post by **Brendan** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 12:47 pm

Grundbegriff wrote:And now we have to deal with Two Face.

From what information are you drawing this conclusion?

Grundbegriff · Post by **Grundbegriff** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 12:49 pm

Brendan wrote:
Grundbegriff wrote:And now we have to deal with Two Face.
From what information are you drawing this conclusion?

From this ifno right here.

Brendan · Post by **Brendan** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 12:53 pm

Evidently I'm not the brightest star in the firmament, as I still don't get it.

I mostly read Marvel comics as a kid. Or Disney, truth be told.

Grundbegriff · Post by **Grundbegriff** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 1:02 pm

Who's in touch with whom?

Assume that Newcastle was not Rachel.

Batman <==> Rachel
Rachel <==> Dent
Joker <==> Ramirez
Joker <==> Sniper
Ramirez <==> Sniper

Who would say "I tried" to whom after attempting to prevent a bandwagon by every means except self-sacrifice?

It follows that
(a) if Isgrimnur is evil, then tru1cy is evil
and
(b) if Isgrimnur is good, and is a member of {Batman, Rachel, Dent}, then tru1cy is an adjacent member of {Batman, Rachel, Dent}.

The only alternative to communication, of course, is scanning.

Brendan · Post by **Brendan** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 1:08 pm

If Isgrimnur was a good special, and tru1cy was a good special, it would be disastrously stupid to publicly admit that you were trying to prevent the other's death, right?

Grundbegriff · Post by **Grundbegriff** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 1:12 pm

tru1cy wrote: isgrimnur

Sorry dude I tried...

This calls for interpretation.

Mr Bubbles · Post by **Mr Bubbles** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 1:15 pm

Grundbegriff wrote:
tru1cy wrote: isgrimnur

Sorry dude I tried...
This calls for interpretation.

My thought was he is a normal who just wanted to get himself killed to try to prevent any powered from getting hit. I could be wrong as I often am.

Grundbegriff · Post by **Grundbegriff** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 1:21 pm

Mr Bubbles wrote:
Grundbegriff wrote:
tru1cy wrote: isgrimnur

Sorry dude I tried...
This calls for interpretation.
My thought was he is a normal who just wanted to get himself killed to try to prevent any powered from getting hit. I could be wrong as I often am.

Had that been the case, why would he have withdrawn from consideration at the last second and secured the other's death?

Of course, if Isgrimnur and tru1cy are both good Specials, a forking sequence unfolds tonight. And when you come to a fork in the road, it's a good idea to take it.

tru1cy · Post by **tru1cy** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 1:23 pm

Grundbegriff wrote:
tru1cy wrote: isgrimnur

Sorry dude I tried...
This calls for interpretation.

I was happy to off myself, but with Isgrimnur close...

Anyway, I would have been happy to die as I have no worth other than being fodder

Grundbegriff · Post by **Grundbegriff** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 1:24 pm

tru1cy wrote:Anyway, I would have been happy to die as I have no worth other than being fodder

So it was just a Kelricky Might-As-Well-Stay-Alive-After-All move?