Page 11 of 60

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Fri May 24, 2013 2:04 pm
by El Guapo
redrun wrote: Withdraw Lassr 
 

 Qantaga 
 


I'll start it. Let's see where it goes.
So....what's the Qantaga rationale?

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Fri May 24, 2013 2:48 pm
by theohall
Poking the silents is something usually accepted on Day One. Apparently not by you this round.
Unagi wrote:So, join me on the pr0ner vote and see if I still got it.

With the Cabal in this game, I think it's likely that a few Cabal members 'smell' like wolves. That kinda tosses a wrench into things with early analysis of players. Coordination but not being seen as 'together', making knowingly false accustations and see how people react to that, etc. - these are all things the Cabal is likely doing right now, and it's all things the wolves are likely doing as well.

So, yeah - I'm not sure if I am sensing Wovles or Cabal when I feel I sense something and I'm not really sure what to share.

I was thinking about this whole Day 1 thing (and back to the CR votes from last game, for instance). Reasons not to vote a player off on Day 1 should mostly be because they may actually contribute positively, eventually. I think we all feel that Grund is capable of that, but I personally am rubbed wrong by the whole feeling that he is special and he is allowed to blow off Day 1. He could simply post on Day 1 and avoid that, but he has (recent history) tended to seem to thumb his nose at that mundane expectation. That very fact tends to make him look 'good', in that an evil Grund would rather help his wolf team by not being lynched on Day 1, so he would simply post... but - would that then make him look like that's WHY he is suddenly posting on Day 1. So, bleh - I am not sure what to do about it. Frankly, I think "not playing/posting", even as (especially as?) a Tactic is CANCER to these games. I'm ready to cut. That being said, Grund is a very large part of (historically) what made these games fun, and it really bums me out.

Newcastle. He could easily do the whole 'Look at me, I am posting poems' as a wolf - look back to any game where he was a wolf. He isn't a "hider". He plays it. Period.

So, personally I suggested pr0ner, because he is normally a pretty quiet player and will likely remain that way... and what's this? now he's flying the "you call that participation?" flag. That was pretty ironic. But I'm happy to hear/read it.


Not sure really what to do at this point. I wish our trains were on other players, to be honest.

OK, here's an idea....

Does anyone want to end the game with  Theohall 
 
as either the last wolf or their only human partner left to fend off the wolves?
Join you on the pr0ner vote whom you were no longer voting for?? At this point, you were being as self-contradictory as myself on the Chaos/Grund/silent thing. No big deal as it looks like the regular Day One stuff.
Unagi wrote:
redrun wrote:
Unagi wrote:
Unagi wrote:So, join me on the pr0ner vote and see if I still got it.
(that was in reply to redrun, but clearly my post went in another direction anyhow)
:)

I did follow what you were saying.... right up to the point where you moved your vote to Theohall.

Pr0ner hasn't caught my radar yet, but I'll do a re-read on him. However, pushing for me to join you implies to me that you strongly think Pr0ner is a wolf, where-as your vote for Theohall comes off much less as "kill a wolf" as compared to: "I'm frustrated by Theohall".
redrun,
last game, Scoop and Vorret both stood out to me a great deal and I pushed hard for them from the very start. I don't have a player currently that I feel that strongly about. I've actually felt a number of players (too many) sorta 'flash evil' like that to me this game, but nothing like Scoop and Vorret from the last game.
My comment on you joining me on the pr0ner vote was because you said:
"the wolves should try on night one to pick off a player who is known to be good at spotting wolves....<snip> After last game it would not have surprised me to see Unagi die night one."
So, if you thought I was good at getting wolves, why not join me in my vote instead of saying you think I am likely a wolf, because I failed to be killed by the wolves who must clearly fear me? (I'll also comment that I've never joined a Wolf Team that started off with 'fear' as their motto... they would MUCH rather convince the village to kill me, IMO, and laugh about it, which I have ZERO doubt is going on right now.)

However, it's not my strong opinion that pr0ner is a blatant wolf. He is just a super quiet player that (at the time) had hardly posted and I would rather not end the game with him as one of the last choices to be had. It can be stated as crudely as this: Without an obvious wolf candidate, I'm willing to vote off the person I think would make the least helpful villager, should it indeed be a miss of that caliber. Trumping even that (and this is where LM and I are in 100% agreement), I'm also willing to vote off the person I think will just tank this whole game with their abscence.

THEN I started thinking more along that philosophy... (specifically, pr0ner recently had a really strong game, from what I've been told, I wasn't in it) And it struck me that I'd rather (all things being equal... ie... anyone could be villager or wolf at this point) end the game with pr0ner than I would with Theohall... And here is the thing with that:
a) when I first posted this, I selected Theohall not 'as a wolf' but more as 'a horrible person to be with at the end game' (sorry :oops: , my opinion)
b) but there wasn't anything he posted (he's been pretty damn 'sober and in control' for Theohall, but it's early) that made him seem particularly human.
c) since then, he made that odd comment about needing to poke the silent players, but he doesn't find their silence to be all that damaging to the game.

That's what's behind the theohall vote.
It's 1 part 'end game'
It's 1 part 'why the hell not'
and it's 1 part 'Really, what on earth are you trying to sell me?"

I'm not hellbent on Theohall being a wolf at this point, but I have little reason not to test him over someone else.

I'd reluctantly join the Grund or Newcastle train if I couldn't get a different one started.
So you would rather lynch me than a wolf. This seems to suggest you actually know I am not a wolf. Only the wolves, the Seer (who would never waste their time scanning me with the first scan), and Cabal members (were you and I actually in the Cabal) would know.
Unagi wrote:Vorret was on the Grund train eary, because he felt Grund maybe killed Holman to clear hard-reads, but then when I made my post about theohall, Vorret said it was a good post and removed his vote for Grund - - Vorret, I'd like to hear why my post lead to you removing your vote on Grund (would have made a small degree of sense, had you then put your vote on Theohall, but you didn't)

and... LM, what is it about the dropping of the Grund votes that made you drop your vote on Theohall?
This seems like pushing by questioning those who didn't leave their vote on me. Why the seeming push, unless you know something about me already, if it is supposedly just regular Day One stuff?
Unagi wrote:
LordMortis wrote:to be part of the precipitate rather than part of the solution.
I love that t-shirt.

And, yeah - OK, I had a simular response, but frankly it made me feel even better about the Theohall vote.
While making a joke - the continued push.
Unagi wrote:Here is where you can read right up front about how Theohall's vote was interfacing with Grund. He forecasted that the vote was meaningless and would be removed the second Grund showed that he was willing to post at all. This is a fantastic way for a wolf to spend Day 1... a bunch of meaningless 'poke' votes that come with the Pre-agreed-upon "I will be removing this vote later". Theohall wasn't putting anyone 'to the fire', and a 'poke the silent' has no "poke" if it comes with a pre-approved out-clause. What that is, is hiding on Day 1 - making a bunch of meaningless votes.

Theohall was just trying to get silents to participate. I suppose he feels now that Grund has participated?
theohall wrote:I am just trying to get silents to participate. Check my first vote and when it was withdrawn. Many agreed being silent in a large game is bad and the silent should be lynched, as happened to Chaosraven. I don't subscribe to this theory, but it is interesting seeing those who pushed it last game ignoring it now. Yes, there is info to be gleaned from this. When Grundbegriff actually posts I will withdraw my vote.
Continuing to push. You know I am a villager, don't you, wolf-breath?
Unagi wrote:
Scoop20906 wrote:I'm kind of curious if Unagi still thinks I might be a werewolf this game. Unagi?
I'm on the fence. I basically look for certain 'at ease' signs with your play, and I'm not really seeing them.
You distrust Scoop, have a vibe about Newcastle, yet your vote is still on someone else. :roll:

So, yes, flimsy reasoning with your vibes about other players. Why aren't you acting on your vibes, instead? Seems wolfy to me, since you usually act on your vibes, as you did the last game.

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Fri May 24, 2013 2:56 pm
by redrun
Remus West wrote:
Remus West wrote:
redrun wrote:Strongly leaning wolf: Lassr, Chaosraven, Qantaga
Leaning wolf: El Guapo, Unagi, RMC, Vorret
Leaning good: Nobody.
Why is Chaoraven on there? He listed you with a far fetched reason. What has he done that makes him look suspicious to you?

Also, why is theohall not suspicious to you? I don't think anyone in the game is acting more out of typical character than he is currently. Why is that not suspicious to you?
Since you were around to post would you mind addressing these questions?
I'd not realized that I was required to respond to your questions the next time I posted.

Chaosraven feels off to me. He seems strongly intent on pushing the idea 'local' players are making my threat list only due to locality, and/or I'm trying to pull a "see I said someone local was evil - and it was me. Ha! Ha! I get to laugh in all your faces". That's not my style, and he should know it.

My standard Theohall disclaimer is that he always looks guilty to me. However, while I think I'm getting better at reading him, so far nothing has stood out to me. I could easily be missing something - but given the difficulty I have in reading him, I tend to put him on backburner for the first few turns of the game and see what I see later. Thus, he's rarely on my threat lists until several game days have past.

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Fri May 24, 2013 3:09 pm
by bb2112
Qantaga wrote:
redrun wrote:I'll start it. Let's see where it goes.

:pop:
It will probably go nowhere since lynching Q on day 1 is almost as hard a lynching Remus.

But I will put my vote where my mouth is and watch this train die in a day or two.

 Qantaga 
 

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Fri May 24, 2013 10:34 pm
by Chaosraven
Yo yo Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetroit Posse!

 Qantaga 
 

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Fri May 24, 2013 10:35 pm
by Chaosraven
redrun wrote:bark bark bark.
woof woof
hooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooowl
arf arf.
Indeed.

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Fri May 24, 2013 11:30 pm
by El Guapo
bb2112 wrote: Qantaga 
 


For not believing that I can resist voting for RW or CR day one after RMC pretty much cleared them, and then totally missing the fact that I voted LM. Even while noting later that LM is part of the Detroit gaming group. It is like he is trying to cause confusion where there isn't any. Not usually his style. I like his lists better. :P
Since no one seems to want to answer my question about why we're voting for Qantaga...is this it? Or at least part of it?

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Sat May 25, 2013 12:06 am
by Qantaga
El Guapo, here's the sequence of events.

Early on, I made an observation that I thought that it was strange that bb stated that he would not vote on Remus or Chaos on Day 1.

Remus called me on that because the essence of the post was that bb was acting on the "RMC is always wrong" meme in direct conflict to the "I'll laugh if Remus or Chaos dies before me" meme.

I conceded Remus' point.

Then, after all that transpired, bb came back with the paragraph you quoted above, saying he was suspicious of me for sowing confusion.

Here's the problem with bb's claim of me sowing confusion, based on those events:

- bb assumes that I should have known that the "RMC is always wrong" meme has taken precedence over the "I'd laugh if Remus or Chaos die before me" meme, when in every game that I have ever played with bb, he has expressed desire (either truthful or in jest) for Remus (and to a lesser extent) Chaos to be lynched on Day 1.
- bb then says that I did not notice that he voted on LM as a part of the Detroit crowd. The fallacy with this is that he did not vote on LM for the "I'll laugh if LM dies before me" rationale, but he voted for LM because "LM will beg for death soon and I'm in a generous mood." The truth is that, historically, bb has always expressed a Day 1 desire to off Remus far and away above anyone else. Chaos comes in a distant second. LM and redrun, a distant third . So, for me to observe that I find it strange for him to state that he would not vote for Remus or Chaos today (regardless of "RMC is always wrong") is not sowing confusion.

In this game, any rationale given to paint me as evil will be similar to the rationale used against Gerry Conlan.

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Sat May 25, 2013 8:45 am
by Lassr
After a week of observations here are the few things that I took note of that could be something or could be nothing.

We'll start with my redrun vote:

redrun wrote:
Lassr wrote:
redrun wrote: Just to save some time here, is there anyone out there who isn't the seer?
See here is what was delaying the wolves, they were waiting to see who would not claim seer.

 redrun 
 
I'm a bit confused. Right before you voted for me you stated:
Lassr wrote:Come one guys. What are the odds that Remus is good 2 games in a row?
Later that same day (real day):
Lassr wrote:
LordMortis wrote: And looking over the rules/roles this like a game where things are tilted in the village's favor. Yay village.
Only wolves read all the rules...
You have one other post that isn't fluff:
Lassr wrote:
El Guapo wrote:How hard is it to choose a kill on night zero? Is it who tells the funniest joke in the village? The least funny joke?
So you know for a fact the wolves are holding up the game? :ninja:

Possibly true, my orders are in though...
Combined with your day one "I have my orders in" statement (ie: hinting that you are a special), I'm not sure if you're poking for response, or just spreading guilt with a wide trowel hoping to see what you can make stick.

But no good special would have outed themself with a "my orders are in" line, right? So I can assume you're either wolf or plain 'ol villager?

 Lassr 
 
As I often do, I throw out little jabs on day 1 just to see what happens. Of all the little jabs redrun is the one I chose to cast a vote. There was nothing really behind the vote other than to get a reaction. His reaction was rather defensive so at that point I saw no reason to withdraw the vote.

His accusation that I'm trying to spread guilt seems a bit absurd. Not sure how successful I could be spreading guilt over obviously joke accusations.

Which brings me to one of my joke accusations below.
Lassr wrote:
LordMortis wrote: And looking over the rules/roles this like a game where things are tilted in the village's favor. Yay village.
Only wolves read all the rules...
I didn't quote this because he read the rules I was marking it so I could come back to it later. What really bothered me is he said "The village's favor" not "Our fvor." It felt like a wolf statement. May mean nothing but these little things is all we can go on sometimes.
LordMortis wrote:Unagi lives! He must be a wolf.
<other stuff snipped out>
He also said this. It felt like a small bit of doubt being planted about Unagi simply because last few games Unagi has been dead on on nailing wolves and I commented during BSG that if I was ever a wolf then Unagi would be my night one kill. Unagi could be wolf or LordMortis just used the opportunity to plant some doubt or it is nothing.

The other odd behavior is Scoop. Last game as a "bad Cylon" he was very talkative and active, he was lynched. This game seems to be the opposite so is it because he is just a villager or a wolf trying the opposite tactic hoping to live longer?

Those are the observations after week 1 that stood out to me.

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Sat May 25, 2013 7:33 pm
by Scoop20906
Unagi wrote:
Scoop20906 wrote:I'm kind of curious if Unagi still thinks I might be a werewolf this game. Unagi?
I'm on the fence. I basically look for certain 'at ease' signs with your play, and I'm not really seeing them.
Thank you for the info. I'm working hard to foil your radar. :mrgreen:

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Sat May 25, 2013 7:38 pm
by Scoop20906
RMC wrote:
Scoop20906 wrote:RMC, I would love to be your puppy dog. :o)
Here is my puppy, but you can be his minion. :) Of course you have to ask my daughter first. Our "puppy" is just barely 1 year old in this picture.

Image
Awww, de cute puppy. :) Thanks for sharing, RMC.

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Sat May 25, 2013 9:20 pm
by theohall
FYI for Qantaga. The last time I remember bb2112 not playing the "Detroit" meme, I was convinced one of the crowd had to be a wolf. 3 lynches later, none of them were which I am sure the wolves totally enjoyed, because I kept pushing for the lynches of Chaosraven, Remus West, and bb2112. The wolves obliged by "helping" those lynches along.

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Sat May 25, 2013 11:23 pm
by Remus West
 redrun 
 

seems awfully confrontational which is very out of character for him. Right now I'm torn between him and Mr. Rational himself, theohall.

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 12:43 pm
by bb2112
Qantaga wrote:El Guapo, here's the sequence of events.

Early on, I made an observation that I thought that it was strange that bb stated that he would not vote on Remus or Chaos on Day 1.

Remus called me on that because the essence of the post was that bb was acting on the "RMC is always wrong" meme in direct conflict to the "I'll laugh if Remus or Chaos dies before me" meme.

I conceded Remus' point.

Then, after all that transpired, bb came back with the paragraph you quoted above, saying he was suspicious of me for sowing confusion.

Here's the problem with bb's claim of me sowing confusion, based on those events:

- bb assumes that I should have known that the "RMC is always wrong" meme has taken precedence over the "I'd laugh if Remus or Chaos die before me" meme, when in every game that I have ever played with bb, he has expressed desire (either truthful or in jest) for Remus (and to a lesser extent) Chaos to be lynched on Day 1.
- bb then says that I did not notice that he voted on LM as a part of the Detroit crowd. The fallacy with this is that he did not vote on LM for the "I'll laugh if LM dies before me" rationale, but he voted for LM because "LM will beg for death soon and I'm in a generous mood." The truth is that, historically, bb has always expressed a Day 1 desire to off Remus far and away above anyone else. Chaos comes in a distant second. LM and redrun, a distant third . So, for me to observe that I find it strange for him to state that he would not vote for Remus or Chaos today (regardless of "RMC is always wrong") is not sowing confusion.

In this game, any rationale given to paint me as evil will be similar to the rationale used against Gerry Conlan.
Once again you are missing something very basic. Of course I will laugh my ass off if Remus or CR get lynched today. Why wouldnt I? I just said I wasn't going to push it today. Just because I have noticed RMC's polish wolf detector to be more accurate than my amusement doesn't mean I have given up my skewed sense of humor. Seriously, you just seem off, and I know you are a good player, so this is really confusing the hell out of me.

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 4:48 pm
by Chaosraven
Remus, you coming out to the Lake?

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 1:52 am
by Remus West
Chaosraven wrote:Remus, you coming out to the Lake?
Got too busy here trying to get caught up on work. Need to do the same all day tomorrow. :(

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 4:25 am
by Lagom Lite
 withdraw Scoop 
 


 Qantaga 
 

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 5:14 am
by theohall
 withdraw Unagi

bb2112 

 

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 12:13 pm
by tru1cy
Why the train on Qantaga? I guess he's good as anyone else but i'm jumping on it. I might be able to vote for Theohall or Unagi. Will check again when things slow down f
or me

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 12:15 pm
by tru1cy
That should read i'm not jumping on it. Stupid android keyboard :-(

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 12:27 pm
by purge
tru1cy wrote:That should read i'm not jumping on it. Stupid android keyboard :-(
You were complaining about how your paws always hit the wrong keys in the last game.

Same problem? ;)

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 4:07 pm
by Lagom Lite
I've got a day off on Wednesday, I'll read through the thread and make a proper threat list then. Not that there will ever be so much to analyse on Day 1, but still.

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 8:25 am
by redrun
El Guapo wrote:
redrun wrote: Withdraw Lassr 
 

 Qantaga 
 


I'll start it. Let's see where it goes.
So....what's the Qantaga rationale?
He feels much different to me this game as compared to last game. I have no smoking gun or other knowledge that would lead me to say it is a sure thing that he is evil - but he feels different. A number of folks listed him as a secondary possibilty for a lynch, and I decided that I'd like to see where a lynch vote would go and to see what we'd learn from it.

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 8:28 am
by redrun
First this:
Chaosraven wrote:Yo yo Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetroit Posse!

 Qantaga 
 
Followed by this:
Chaosraven wrote:
redrun wrote:bark bark bark.
woof woof
hooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooowl
arf arf.
Indeed.
Are you trying to mess with my mind?

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 8:34 am
by RMC
After the long weekend, I somehow agree with Remus saying that redrun seems defensive. While not horribly so, he seems a little more aggressive in his defense.

So:

 Withdraw El Guapo 
 


 redrun 
 


Now scoop be a good little follower, and switch your vote as well. :)

10 DAY WARNING

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 9:12 am
by stessier
Day 1 Vote Count
Spoiler:
  • Scoop acc Qantaga (1)
    Bakhtosh acc Newcastle (1)
    bb2112 acc LordMortis (1)
    tru1cy acc Grundbegriff (1)
  • Lassr acc redrun (1)
    theohall acc Chaosraven (1)
    LordMortis acc bb2112 (1)
    Lagom Lite acc Chaosraven (2)
    Remus West acc Newcastle (2)
    Bakhtosh wd Newcastle (1)
  • Bakhtosh acc RMC (1)
    Vorret acc Grundbegriff (2)
    redrun acc Lassr (1)
  • El Guapo acc Newcastle (2)
    RMC acc El Guapo (1)
    Lagom Lite wd Chaosraven (1)
    Lagom LIte acc Scoop (1)
    Unagi acc pr0ner (1)
  • pr0ner acc Newcastle (3)
    bb2112 wd LordMortis (0)
    bb2112 acc Qantaga (2)
    Scoop wd Qantaga (1)
    Scoop acc Newcastle (4)
    theohall wd Chaosraven (0)
    theohall acc Grundbegriff (3)
    bb2112 wd Qantaga (0)
    bb2112 acc Newcastle (5)
  • Newcastle acc Grundbegriff (4)
    Lagom LIte wd Scoop (0)
    Lagom Lite acc Grundbegriff (5)
    LordMortis wd bb2112 (0)
    LordMortis acc Qantaga (1)
    Unagi wd pr0ner (0)
  • Unagi acc theohall (1)
    LordMortis wd Qantaga (0)
    LordMortis acc theohall (2)
    Vorret wd Grund (4)
    bb2112 wd Newcastle (4)
    bb2112 acc Lagom LIte (1)
    Scoop wd Newcastle (3)
  • Scoop acc El Guapo (2)
  • trig acc Scoop (1)
    theohall wd Grund (3)
    tru1cy wd Grund (2)
    Lagom wd Grund (1)
    Lagom acc Scoop (2)
    theohall acc Unagi (1)
    LordMortis wd theohall (1)
  • Qantaga acc Lagom Lite (2)
    bb2112 wd Lagom Lite (1)
    bb2112 acc theohall (2)
    redrun wd Lassr (0)
  • redrun acc Qantaga (1)
    bb2112 wd theohall (1)
  • bb2112 acc Qantaga (2)
  • Chaos acc Qantaga (3)
    Remus wd Newcastle (2)
  • Remus acc redrun (2)
    Lagom wd Scoop (1)
  • Lagom acc Qantaga (4)
    theohall wd Unagi (0)
  • theohall acc bb2112 (1)
    RMC wd El Guapo (0)
  • RMC acc redrun (3)
Votes required for lynch - 11

Against Qantaga (4) - redrun, bb2112, Chaosraven, Lagom Lite
Against redrun (3) - Lassr, Remus, RMC
Against Newcastle (2) - El Guapo, pr0ner
Against theohall (1) - Unagi
Against El Guapo (1) - Scoop
Against Scoop (1) - triggercut
Against Grundbegriff (1) - Newcastle
Against RMC (1) - Bakhtosh
Against Lagom LIte (1) - Qantaga
Against bb2112 (1) - theohall

No votes - Purge, Grundbegriff, tru1cy, Vorret, LordMortis

There are 17 villagers alive. The deadline for the lynch vote is June 6th at 9pm Eastern time.

Re: 10 DAY WARNING

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 9:19 am
by Lassr
stessier wrote:Day 1 Vote Count
Spoiler:
  • Scoop acc Qantaga (1)
    Bakhtosh acc Newcastle (1)
    bb2112 acc LordMortis (1)
    tru1cy acc Grundbegriff (1)
  • Lassr acc redrun (1)
    theohall acc Chaosraven (1)
    LordMortis acc bb2112 (1)
    Lagom Lite acc Chaosraven (2)
    Remus West acc Newcastle (2)
    Bakhtosh wd Newcastle (1)
  • Bakhtosh acc RMC (1)
    Vorret acc Grundbegriff (2)
    redrun acc Lassr (1)
  • El Guapo acc Newcastle (2)
    RMC acc El Guapo (1)
    Lagom Lite wd Chaosraven (1)
    Lagom LIte acc Scoop (1)
    Unagi acc pr0ner (1)
  • pr0ner acc Newcastle (3)
    bb2112 wd LordMortis (0)
    bb2112 acc Qantaga (2)
    Scoop wd Qantaga (1)
    Scoop acc Newcastle (4)
    theohall wd Chaosraven (0)
    theohall acc Grundbegriff (3)
    bb2112 wd Qantaga (0)
    bb2112 acc Newcastle (5)
  • Newcastle acc Grundbegriff (4)
    Lagom LIte wd Scoop (0)
    Lagom Lite acc Grundbegriff (5)
    LordMortis wd bb2112 (0)
    LordMortis acc Qantaga (1)
    Unagi wd pr0ner (0)
  • Unagi acc theohall (1)
    LordMortis wd Qantaga (0)
    LordMortis acc theohall (2)
    Vorret wd Grund (4)
    bb2112 wd Newcastle (4)
    bb2112 acc Lagom LIte (1)
    Scoop wd Newcastle (3)
  • Scoop acc El Guapo (2)
  • trig acc Scoop (1)
    theohall wd Grund (3)
    tru1cy wd Grund (2)
    Lagom wd Grund (1)
    Lagom acc Scoop (2)
    theohall acc Unagi (1)
    LordMortis wd theohall (1)
  • Qantaga acc Lagom Lite (2)
    bb2112 wd Lagom Lite (1)
    bb2112 acc theohall (2)
    redrun wd Lassr (0)
  • redrun acc Qantaga (1)
    bb2112 wd theohall (1)
  • bb2112 acc Qantaga (2)
  • Chaos acc Qantaga (3)
    Remus wd Newcastle (2)
  • Remus acc redrun (2)
    Lagom wd Scoop (1)
  • Lagom acc Qantaga (4)
    theohall wd Unagi (0)
  • theohall acc bb2112 (1)
    RMC wd El Guapo (0)
  • RMC acc redrun (3)
Votes required for lynch - 11

Against Qantaga (4) - redrun, bb2112, Chaosraven, Lagom Lite
Against redrun (3) - Lassr, Redrun, RMC
Against Newcastle (2) - El Guapo, pr0ner
Against theohall (1) - Unagi
Against El Guapo (1) - Scoop
Against Scoop (1) - triggercut
Against Grundbegriff (1) - Newcastle
Against RMC (1) - Bakhtosh
Against Lagom LIte (1) - Qantaga
Against bb2112 (1) - theohall

No votes - Purge, Grundbegriff, tru1cy, Vorret, LordMortis

There are 17 villagers alive. The deadline for the lynch vote is June 6th at 9pm Eastern time.
Replace the redrun vote against redrun with Remus....

Re: 10 DAY WARNING

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 9:20 am
by stessier
Lassr wrote:Replace the redrun vote against redrun with Remus....
So close...

Thanks!

Re: 10 DAY WARNING

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 9:42 am
by LordMortis
Was hoping for some momentum since last I checked in.

I don't know if it's a good or thing that newcastle has stuck to his guns with Grund. I like his decision to hang in there, contrary to Grund's messiah following that waited for his lyric to bail on their votes but the decision to go against "We can't get it done on day one" is so unnewcastlelike. And so I'm torn.

That said, I'm on day one I'm more torn between
No votes - Purge, Grundbegriff, tru1cy, Vorret, LordMortis
And puppy dogging unagi (and more importantly accepting his thought process as well as just puppy dogging him)

And so I go for the one particular vote and bail prospect:

 Theo 
 


to bring at four candidates above one vote.

Re: 10 DAY WARNING

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 11:58 am
by Newcastle
LordMortis wrote:Was hoping for some momentum since last I checked in.

I don't know if it's a good or thing that newcastle has stuck to his guns with Grund. I like his decision to hang in there, contrary to Grund's messiah following that waited for his lyric to bail on their votes but the decision to go against "We can't get it done on day one" is so unnewcastlelike. And so I'm torn.

That said, I'm on day one I'm more torn between
No votes - Purge, Grundbegriff, tru1cy, Vorret, LordMortis
And puppy dogging unagi (and more importantly accepting his thought process as well as just puppy dogging him)

And so I go for the one particular vote and bail prospect:

 Theo 
 


to bring at four candidates above one vote.
what planet
have you been on
starry sky

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 11:59 am
by Newcastle
end will
come for haiku
sunny sky

Re: 10 DAY WARNING

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 12:11 pm
by LordMortis
Newcastle wrote:what planet
have you been on
starry sky
Looking back. I'm wrong. I swore you were one of the people adamantly against voting for absent players last game (and the game before, whatever game that was) and It took me until about 8 pages in to find out you were one of the first.

My bad. Memory updated at least for the moment. Strike the whole being torn thing.

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 2:33 pm
by Bakhtosh
 Withdraw RMC 
 
I still think RMC & Theohall are likely candidates for wolf, but  redrun 
 
is literally howling.

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 2:49 pm
by Remus West
Bakhtosh wrote: Withdraw RMC 
 
I still think RMC & Theohall are likely candidates for wolf, but  redrun 
 
is literally howling.
Interesting.

Re: 10 DAY WARNING

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 5:32 pm
by triggercut
stessier wrote:Day 1 Vote Count
Spoiler:
  • Scoop acc Qantaga (1)
    Bakhtosh acc Newcastle (1)
    bb2112 acc LordMortis (1)
    tru1cy acc Grundbegriff (1)
  • Lassr acc redrun (1)
    theohall acc Chaosraven (1)
    LordMortis acc bb2112 (1)
    Lagom Lite acc Chaosraven (2)
    Remus West acc Newcastle (2)
    Bakhtosh wd Newcastle (1)
  • Bakhtosh acc RMC (1)
    Vorret acc Grundbegriff (2)
    redrun acc Lassr (1)
  • El Guapo acc Newcastle (2)
    RMC acc El Guapo (1)
    Lagom Lite wd Chaosraven (1)
    Lagom LIte acc Scoop (1)
    Unagi acc pr0ner (1)
  • pr0ner acc Newcastle (3)
    bb2112 wd LordMortis (0)
    bb2112 acc Qantaga (2)
    Scoop wd Qantaga (1)
    Scoop acc Newcastle (4)
    theohall wd Chaosraven (0)
    theohall acc Grundbegriff (3)
    bb2112 wd Qantaga (0)
    bb2112 acc Newcastle (5)
  • Newcastle acc Grundbegriff (4)
    Lagom LIte wd Scoop (0)
    Lagom Lite acc Grundbegriff (5)
    LordMortis wd bb2112 (0)
    LordMortis acc Qantaga (1)
    Unagi wd pr0ner (0)
  • Unagi acc theohall (1)
    LordMortis wd Qantaga (0)
    LordMortis acc theohall (2)
    Vorret wd Grund (4)
    bb2112 wd Newcastle (4)
    bb2112 acc Lagom LIte (1)
    Scoop wd Newcastle (3)
  • Scoop acc El Guapo (2)
  • trig acc Scoop (1)
    theohall wd Grund (3)
    tru1cy wd Grund (2)
    Lagom wd Grund (1)
    Lagom acc Scoop (2)
    theohall acc Unagi (1)
    LordMortis wd theohall (1)
  • Qantaga acc Lagom Lite (2)
    bb2112 wd Lagom Lite (1)
    bb2112 acc theohall (2)
    redrun wd Lassr (0)
  • redrun acc Qantaga (1)
    bb2112 wd theohall (1)
  • bb2112 acc Qantaga (2)
  • Chaos acc Qantaga (3)
    Remus wd Newcastle (2)
  • Remus acc redrun (2)
    Lagom wd Scoop (1)
  • Lagom acc Qantaga (4)
    theohall wd Unagi (0)
  • theohall acc bb2112 (1)
    RMC wd El Guapo (0)
  • RMC acc redrun (3)
Votes required for lynch - 11

Against Qantaga (4) - redrun, bb2112, Chaosraven, Lagom Lite
Against redrun (3) - Lassr, Remus, RMC
Against Newcastle (2) - El Guapo, pr0ner
Against theohall (1) - Unagi
Against El Guapo (1) - Scoop
Against Scoop (1) - triggercut
Against Grundbegriff (1) - Newcastle
Against RMC (1) - Bakhtosh
Against Lagom LIte (1) - Qantaga
Against bb2112 (1) - theohall

No votes - Purge, Grundbegriff, tru1cy, Vorret, LordMortis

There are 17 villagers alive. The deadline for the lynch vote is June 6th at 9pm Eastern time.
So...wait. 17 players. 9 needed to swing someone.

Only 12 people have a registered vote on this update, so of the 12 people putting a hat in the ring, they need 9 to agree.

That's going to be tough to do!

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 5:37 pm
by stessier
There are 17 Villagers & 4 wolves for a total of 21 players. Thus, the majority is 11.

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 5:56 pm
by triggercut
stessier wrote:There are 17 Villagers & 4 wolves for a total of 21 players. Thus, the majority is 11.
So then 16 of us have registered a vote. Need 11. So 11 of the 16 votes have to be on one person to get a swinging party going.

We need more people to cast votes.

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 8:33 pm
by pr0ner
Newcastle wrote:end will
come for haiku
sunny sky
I'll strongly consider not voting for you anymore if you stop.

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 9:23 pm
by bb2112
Pr0ner is yelling uncle

Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1

Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 2:14 am
by theohall
Interesting that nobody currently has a vote on redrun, in spite of the "he's a wolf" talk about him.