That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
Me? I've barely interacted with bb. Did you mean to say Remus?triggercut wrote:Honestly, the footsie between bb2112 and el guapo is kinda freakin' me out.
I may never vote Guapo again.El Guapo wrote:Also - in hindsight, how did we ever decide to play this game without deadlines? Everything else aside, regularly pushing up against arbitrary deadlines with catastrophic consequences is virtually the raison d'etre of the Republican Party these days.
Anyone who strongly opposed deadlines moves up +1 on my suspect list.
You do not need to have solid information to try and get someone lynched. If you manage to actually get a bad guy lynched (it has happened a few times) then that would tell us a whole lot about you. Posting nonsense and squirrels tells us nothing in the long run.bb2112 wrote:Remus West wrote:I could vote bb2112 mostly because LM posting habits and squirrel pictures are not going to give us anything to judge by later.
Yes, because day one there was so much solid information out there for everyone to form strong opinions.
Remus West
You interacted. It was quite indirect but interesting.El Guapo wrote:Me? I've barely interacted with bb. Did you mean to say Remus?triggercut wrote:Honestly, the footsie between bb2112 and el guapo is kinda freakin' me out.
bb won't give me the time of day.
If you say so. Either way, I went home alone.triggercut wrote:You interacted. It was quite indirect but interesting.El Guapo wrote:Me? I've barely interacted with bb. Did you mean to say Remus?triggercut wrote:Honestly, the footsie between bb2112 and el guapo is kinda freakin' me out.
bb won't give me the time of day.
As for RMC, I did not like this post. I could go for RMC, though I am not yet sold on it.RMC wrote: Remus West
Why? Because he did not like Lassr.
And I actually have no idea who is a baddie, but Remus is always a good bet in my book.
Ok. By that logic you must have some great information on others in this game since nobody else has been posting nonsense and squirrels. Let's hear it.Remus West wrote:You do not need to have solid information to try and get someone lynched. If you manage to actually get a bad guy lynched (it has happened a few times) then that would tell us a whole lot about you. Posting nonsense and squirrels tells us nothing in the long run.bb2112 wrote:Remus West wrote:I could vote bb2112 mostly because LM posting habits and squirrel pictures are not going to give us anything to judge by later.
Yes, because day one there was so much solid information out there for everyone to form strong opinions.
Remus West
actually saying nothing also tells us nothing in the long run. Kinda like Qantaga.Remus West wrote:You do not need to have solid information to try and get someone lynched. If you manage to actually get a bad guy lynched (it has happened a few times) then that would tell us a whole lot about you. Posting nonsense and squirrels tells us nothing in the long run.bb2112 wrote:Remus West wrote:I could vote bb2112 mostly because LM posting habits and squirrel pictures are not going to give us anything to judge by later.
Yes, because day one there was so much solid information out there for everyone to form strong opinions.
Remus West
theohall (3): Lassr, tru1cy, RMCNewcastle Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:28 pm wrote: newcastle
because i hate being half on and half off, and now i know i am totally and fully out.
I have no real suspects for anyone. Sorry for the self vote, but its for the best.
Later, and may the democratic hunting be good!
Qantaga wrote:Bear of a work/travel schedule last week. I'll catch up tonight.
This word "logic". I do not think it means what you think it means.bb2112 wrote:Ok. By that logic you must have some great information on others in this game since nobody else has been posting nonsense and squirrels. Let's hear it.Remus West wrote:You do not need to have solid information to try and get someone lynched. If you manage to actually get a bad guy lynched (it has happened a few times) then that would tell us a whole lot about you. Posting nonsense and squirrels tells us nothing in the long run.bb2112 wrote:Remus West wrote:I could vote bb2112 mostly because LM posting habits and squirrel pictures are not going to give us anything to judge by later.
Yes, because day one there was so much solid information out there for everyone to form strong opinions.
Remus West
Ok, so your position is not logical. Just checking. Btw, I'm a fine choice for a lynch. I even encourage it. I just wanted to see how you would react to the poke. My top two suspects are Trig and El G at the moment. Although you are climbing the charts quickly. If my voting patterns and this declaration do not give you enough information, then do your worst.Remus West wrote:This word "logic". I do not think it means what you think it means.bb2112 wrote:Ok. By that logic you must have some great information on others in this game since nobody else has been posting nonsense and squirrels. Let's hear it.Remus West wrote:You do not need to have solid information to try and get someone lynched. If you manage to actually get a bad guy lynched (it has happened a few times) then that would tell us a whole lot about you. Posting nonsense and squirrels tells us nothing in the long run.bb2112 wrote:Remus West wrote:I could vote bb2112 mostly because LM posting habits and squirrel pictures are not going to give us anything to judge by later.
Yes, because day one there was so much solid information out there for everyone to form strong opinions.
Remus West
No. Your statement did not follow logic. There is no connection between a comment on your posting pattern from the first day and the information I may or may not have garnered from other players postings. Some contributed as little as you did on day 1 some more. Few were as out of character.bb2112 wrote:Ok, so your position is not logical. Just checking. Btw, I'm a fine choice for a lynch. I even encourage it. I just wanted to see how you would react to the poke. My top two suspects are Trig and El G at the moment. Although you are climbing the charts quickly. If my voting patterns and this declaration do not give you enough information, then do your worst.Remus West wrote:This word "logic". I do not think it means what you think it means.bb2112 wrote:Ok. By that logic you must have some great information on others in this game since nobody else has been posting nonsense and squirrels. Let's hear it.Remus West wrote:You do not need to have solid information to try and get someone lynched. If you manage to actually get a bad guy lynched (it has happened a few times) then that would tell us a whole lot about you. Posting nonsense and squirrels tells us nothing in the long run.bb2112 wrote:Remus West wrote:I could vote bb2112 mostly because LM posting habits and squirrel pictures are not going to give us anything to judge by later.
Yes, because day one there was so much solid information out there for everyone to form strong opinions.
Remus West
It's from a movie, where the dog would stop mid sentence, and say, "Squirrel" (An animated movie, so dogs can talk). I think the movie was UP, by Pixar.El Guapo wrote:And no one's explained the squirrel thing to me yet.
I don't think he can concentrate that long to notice that he is actually distracted.El Guapo wrote:So bb is saying that he's easily distracted, then?
Actually I knew what you meant. I was just pointing out the absurdity of your statement. My banter aside, I have given you votes and a lot more to go on than many. Now if you want to lynch me for being out of character, that is a different story. Go right ahead. Put me out of my misery in a game where I dislike the premise and no deadlines. Hey, you may even get lucky. Punk.Remus West wrote:No. Your statement did not follow logic. There is no connection between a comment on your posting pattern from the first day and the information I may or may not have garnered from other players postings. Some contributed as little as you did on day 1 some more. Few were as out of character.bb2112 wrote:Ok, so your position is not logical. Just checking. Btw, I'm a fine choice for a lynch. I even encourage it. I just wanted to see how you would react to the poke. My top two suspects are Trig and El G at the moment. Although you are climbing the charts quickly. If my voting patterns and this declaration do not give you enough information, then do your worst.Remus West wrote:This word "logic". I do not think it means what you think it means.bb2112 wrote:Ok. By that logic you must have some great information on others in this game since nobody else has been posting nonsense and squirrels. Let's hear it.Remus West wrote:You do not need to have solid information to try and get someone lynched. If you manage to actually get a bad guy lynched (it has happened a few times) then that would tell us a whole lot about you. Posting nonsense and squirrels tells us nothing in the long run.bb2112 wrote:Remus West wrote:I could vote bb2112 mostly because LM posting habits and squirrel pictures are not going to give us anything to judge by later.
Yes, because day one there was so much solid information out there for everyone to form strong opinions.
Remus West
No, bb was saying that it was day one in a game dealing with politics and no deadlines. Kill me now, do not wait until you go home.El Guapo wrote:So bb is saying that he's easily distracted, then?
tru1cy wrote:okay, somehow I missed lassr was hung...
RMC wrote:Err... Looks like I was already voting for BB and not Theohall. Sorry about that.
This village is way too suicidal.RMC wrote: Withdraw Theohall
BB2112
Let's put him out of his misery.
