Octopus Overlords

Scoop20906 wrote:Yes, I no longer believe RMC is a wolf which torpedoes my whole theory on him. I also think Holmann is as clues as he says. (Not meant to be a jab, just an observation)

I'm will to test tru1cy just based on his attempt to look super helpful.

tru1cy

I'm sworn off self voting or I would pile on. I've nothing to add than these are my suspect

Holman
Pr0ner
Vorrett
Scoop


Btw, I told everyone I would post more after it was becoming a distraction couple of games ago & again I'm being lynched for posting more


I just can't win with you guys

Well I was just ready to switch my vote to RMC and you take it off. Well I guess I better go back and read on tru1cy, but I have to say I'm not really convinced and am leaning on not testing him today. I've played many games with him and he just doesn't seem wolfish to me.

Vorrett is the one who has peaked my interest to this point. Remus is still someone I am watching.

Scoop20906 wrote: To clarify, I'm buying that he seems to barely understand the rulez much less the nuances of this game.

Thanks!

Mr Bubbles wrote:Vorrett is the one who has peaked my interest to this point. Remus is still someone I am watching.

What an interesting statement considering I am the one currently voting Vorrett.

Anyone else find it interesting that Vorret has ignored my voting for him? A brand new player getting his first vote and not even mentioning it? Seems a little too calm imo. Now Bubbles comes along and mentions us both as suspects after he has garner a few votes himself? Very interesting.

Remus West wrote:

Mr Bubbles wrote:Vorrett is the one who has peaked my interest to this point. Remus is still someone I am watching.

What an interesting statement considering I am the one currently voting Vorrett.

Anyone else find it interesting that Vorret has ignored my voting for him? A brand new player getting his first vote and not even mentioning it? Seems a little too calm imo. Now Bubbles comes along and mentions us both as suspects after he has garner a few votes himself? Very interesting.

It's one vote from the most famous (from what everyone says) wolf in the game, I didn't need to react

Remus West wrote:

Mr Bubbles wrote:Vorrett is the one who has peaked my interest to this point. Remus is still someone I am watching.

What an interesting statement considering I am the one currently voting Vorrett.

Anyone else find it interesting that Vorret has ignored my voting for him? A brand new player getting his first vote and not even mentioning it? Seems a little too calm imo. Now Bubbles comes along and mentions us both as suspects after he has garner a few votes himself? Very interesting.

I'm being trying to figure out if this is the inattentive villager Bubbles or the inattentive wolf Bubbles...they look the same sometimes.

Lassr wrote:

Remus West wrote:

Mr Bubbles wrote:Vorrett is the one who has peaked my interest to this point. Remus is still someone I am watching.

What an interesting statement considering I am the one currently voting Vorrett.

Anyone else find it interesting that Vorret has ignored my voting for him? A brand new player getting his first vote and not even mentioning it? Seems a little too calm imo. Now Bubbles comes along and mentions us both as suspects after he has garner a few votes himself? Very interesting.

I'm being trying to figure out if this is the inattentive villager Bubbles or the inattentive wolf Bubbles...they look the same sometimes.

It's comments like these that really disadvantage me and Holman, we don't have any history to base our opinion on.

tru1cy wrote:

Btw, I told everyone I would post more after it was becoming a distraction couple of games ago & again I'm being lynched for posting more


I just can't win with you guys

tru1cy, you're not being lynched (accused) for posting more. I'm happy that you're posting more. The games are more interesting when you're active.

What's bugging me is why you are calling the night kill of bb a newbie move (which I don't believe it was) and then voting on Holman, as if he was the sole decider of the night kill.

I've commented on this twice, once asking you directly to explain your reasoning. Your "newbie move" interpretation of bb's death and your choosing to ignore my requests for you to explain your theory in more detail is why my vote is on you.

Lassr wrote:

Remus West wrote:

Mr Bubbles wrote:Vorrett is the one who has peaked my interest to this point. Remus is still someone I am watching.

What an interesting statement considering I am the one currently voting Vorrett.

Anyone else find it interesting that Vorret has ignored my voting for him? A brand new player getting his first vote and not even mentioning it? Seems a little too calm imo. Now Bubbles comes along and mentions us both as suspects after he has garner a few votes himself? Very interesting.

I'm being trying to figure out if this is the inattentive villager Bubbles or the inattentive wolf Bubbles...they look the same sometimes.

So you're saying that one wolf wouldn't vote for another to make it look like they are not in cahoots? I'd have you know that on more than one occasion while we were both wolves Remus has voted for me.

Mr Bubbles wrote:

Lassr wrote:

Remus West wrote:

Mr Bubbles wrote:Vorrett is the one who has peaked my interest to this point. Remus is still someone I am watching.

What an interesting statement considering I am the one currently voting Vorrett.

Anyone else find it interesting that Vorret has ignored my voting for him? A brand new player getting his first vote and not even mentioning it? Seems a little too calm imo. Now Bubbles comes along and mentions us both as suspects after he has garner a few votes himself? Very interesting.

I'm being trying to figure out if this is the inattentive villager Bubbles or the inattentive wolf Bubbles...they look the same sometimes.

So you're saying that one wolf wouldn't vote for another to make it look like they are not in cahoots? I'd have you know that on more than one occasion while we were both wolves Remus has voted for me.

I think where in the game is where you have to look at this. On day one, when there are more than enough people to vote for someone without the other wolves helping out, I would not expect two of the wolves, out of three to be on the killing vote. Not saying it could not happen, but that the wolves would try not to have that happen. Plus it is something to base suppositions on.

<shrug> I am actually glad you came out of the woodwork Mr. Bubbles. It helps to really balance who should be voted on, if the person comes out and defends themselves, it at least helps to start forming an opinion on what you might think is right or wrong about a person.

So who is your main threats right now? You list Vorrent, and apparently I was interesting enough to vote for, but now you are reading up on Tru1cy.

I already showed mine <wink> <wink> Wanna show me yours?

And Scoop, I already showed you mine, and I don't want to see yours again.... really..I don't...

You guys sure are butchering my name

Vorret wrote:You guys sure are butchering my name

Ahh... Sorry about that... I think I see your name and think Torrent...But with a V.

Heck I called Scoop, Skiip for a long time.

Mr Bubbles wrote:

Lassr wrote:

Remus West wrote:

Mr Bubbles wrote:Vorrett is the one who has peaked my interest to this point. Remus is still someone I am watching.

What an interesting statement considering I am the one currently voting Vorrett.

Anyone else find it interesting that Vorret has ignored my voting for him? A brand new player getting his first vote and not even mentioning it? Seems a little too calm imo. Now Bubbles comes along and mentions us both as suspects after he has garner a few votes himself? Very interesting.

I'm being trying to figure out if this is the inattentive villager Bubbles or the inattentive wolf Bubbles...they look the same sometimes.

So you're saying that one wolf wouldn't vote for another to make it look like they are not in cahoots? I'd have you know that on more than one occasion while we were both wolves Remus has voted for me.

I assume that comment was for Remus since I know he loves to vote for his partners in crime and vice-versa.

My comment was just about your usually quiet self.

Votes -
Majority is 7


Holman (1) - Truicy,
Remus West (2)- Lagom Lite, Mr. Bubbles,
RMC (1)- Holman,
Scoop (1)- RMC,
Truicy (4)- Qantaga, Lassr, Proner, Scoop,
Vorret (1)- Remus West,
Mr. Bubbles (2) - El Guapo, Vorret,


No Votes Cast -

DEADLINE is 6 PM PST (9PM EST) Friday 2/15

If there are any errors please let me know.


57.5 hours left!

-also i should state that i am toying with putting in a hard deadline when the next day starts.

time keeps on ticking ticking ticking into the future...

My vote is still on tru1cy. Not because he is talking but his demeanor after getting a few votes. it is different from his demeanor in the past as I recall.

"hard deadline" ?

Lassr wrote:time keeps on ticking ticking ticking into the future...

My vote is still on tru1cy. Not because he is talking but his demeanor after getting a few votes. it is different from his demeanor in the past as I recall.

Looking at it from someone who has no idea what is past behavior is (and, in a way, is how it should be) he doesn't scream wolf to me.
Basing your vote on how someone acted in a previous game vs this one could be change by his mood, settings, people in the game, etc. So, to me, your vote has no strong base.

Vorret wrote:"hard deadline" ?

basically when the next day dawns i am thinking of saying you have an 8-10 day deadline to achieve a lynch. Failing such, means you enter the night cycle without a lynch. Not sure yet if I will do such nor the number. But i think this group needs a deadline to get some movement going.

Lassr wrote:time keeps on ticking ticking ticking into the future...

My vote is still on tru1cy. Not because he is talking but his demeanor after getting a few votes. it is different from his demeanor in the past as I recall.

You know this comment has been irking me, because I’m not doing anything differently.. at least to me

A. I’m a regular pirate hence I am fodder and dying to protect the shaman and the shooter is part of my job. So why is this strange?
B. If I was a wolf I would have just paid no attention to the vote and probably jumped my vote onto someone else to garner in hopes of getting someone else lynched
C. I’ve played long enough and well versed in these games to know when I shouldn’t be rocking the boat

So you’re claiming I am a wolf cause I am helpful? I can understand Scoop’s vote (I haven’t been ignoring you, but I am set on a course with my lynch and didn’t feel like defending it) I’m smelling some real shenanigans with your vote Lassr. Feels like to me you are jumping on me cause you feel like I would be easy to vote off and you can justify it by saying he was acting weird

 lassr 
 

Also, regarding lassr his reaction to Remus West and my feeling above has me thinking he is a wolf

Vorret wrote:

Lassr wrote:time keeps on ticking ticking ticking into the future...

My vote is still on tru1cy. Not because he is talking but his demeanor after getting a few votes. it is different from his demeanor in the past as I recall.

Looking at it from someone who has no idea what is past behavior is (and, in a way, is how it should be) he doesn't scream wolf to me.
Basing your vote on how someone acted in a previous game vs this one could be change by his mood, settings, people in the game, etc. So, to me, your vote has no strong base.

You will find some players play style change when they are a wolf compared to a villager.

Lassr wrote:

tru1cy wrote: Remus was on a fishing expedition and I'm a little surprised lassr took the bait.

you know that for a fact?

I didn't at the time.

What did he catch?

this got me started on tru1cy. Appeared to be a slip of him KNOWING Remus was fishing because he knows Remus is not a wolf.

tru1cy wrote:

Vorret wrote:Gotcha.
Makes sense.

The reasons for going against Tru1cy are weak though

Its a waste of a vote, but I won't fight it. Its all data for the end game anyway

and maybe I'm mis-remembering but I don't recall tru1cy capitulating this quickly before.

that's what I'm going on.

I'm also good with voting Remus.

 Withdraw RMC 
 


Not enough to go on.

Now I'm looking at my likelies again.

Lassr wrote:

tru1cy wrote:

Vorret wrote:Gotcha.
Makes sense.

The reasons for going against Tru1cy are weak though

Its a waste of a vote, but I won't fight it. Its all data for the end game anyway

and maybe I'm mis-remembering but I don't recall tru1cy capitulating this quickly before.

that's what I'm going on.

I'm also good with voting Remus.

This makes absolutely no sense at all. You voting tru1cy based off the idea that he appears to KNOW I'm not a wolf yet you are also willing to vote for me. Feels like you are trying to make sure tru1cy gets lynched when I'm proven human.

Remus West wrote:

Lassr wrote:

tru1cy wrote:

Vorret wrote:Gotcha.
Makes sense.

The reasons for going against Tru1cy are weak though

Its a waste of a vote, but I won't fight it. Its all data for the end game anyway

and maybe I'm mis-remembering but I don't recall tru1cy capitulating this quickly before.

that's what I'm going on.

I'm also good with voting Remus.

This makes absolutely no sense at all. You voting tru1cy based off the idea that he appears to KNOW I'm not a wolf yet you are also willing to vote for me. Feels like you are trying to make sure tru1cy gets lynched when I'm proven human.

Lassr hasn't been making any sense since this thing started to be honest, throwing random accusation left and right hoping something sticks.

Remus West wrote:

Lassr wrote:

tru1cy wrote:

Vorret wrote:Gotcha.
Makes sense.

The reasons for going against Tru1cy are weak though

Its a waste of a vote, but I won't fight it. Its all data for the end game anyway

and maybe I'm mis-remembering but I don't recall tru1cy capitulating this quickly before.

that's what I'm going on.

I'm also good with voting Remus.

This makes absolutely no sense at all. You voting tru1cy based off the idea that he appears to KNOW I'm not a wolf yet you are also willing to vote for me. Feels like you are trying to make sure tru1cy gets lynched when I'm proven human.

I feel one of you is a wolf but which one. So the lynching of either of you could provide info on the other.

Vorret wrote: Lassr hasn't been making any sense since this thing started to be honest, throwing random accusation left and right hoping something sticks.

Really? Nothing at all?

Lassr wrote:

Vorret wrote: Lassr hasn't been making any sense since this thing started to be honest, throwing random accusation left and right hoping something sticks.

Really? Nothing at all?

and they are not random.

Lassr wrote:

Remus West wrote:

Lassr wrote:

tru1cy wrote:

Vorret wrote:Gotcha.
Makes sense.

The reasons for going against Tru1cy are weak though

Its a waste of a vote, but I won't fight it. Its all data for the end game anyway

and maybe I'm mis-remembering but I don't recall tru1cy capitulating this quickly before.

that's what I'm going on.

I'm also good with voting Remus.

This makes absolutely no sense at all. You voting tru1cy based off the idea that he appears to KNOW I'm not a wolf yet you are also willing to vote for me. Feels like you are trying to make sure tru1cy gets lynched when I'm proven human.

I feel one of you is a wolf but which one. So the lynching of either of you could provide info on the other.

You do realize that you have based your accusation of him off of the idea that he knows me to be human.

Remus West wrote:

Lassr wrote:

Remus West wrote:

Lassr wrote:

tru1cy wrote:

Vorret wrote:Gotcha.
Makes sense.

The reasons for going against Tru1cy are weak though

Its a waste of a vote, but I won't fight it. Its all data for the end game anyway

and maybe I'm mis-remembering but I don't recall tru1cy capitulating this quickly before.

that's what I'm going on.

I'm also good with voting Remus.

This makes absolutely no sense at all. You voting tru1cy based off the idea that he appears to KNOW I'm not a wolf yet you are also willing to vote for me. Feels like you are trying to make sure tru1cy gets lynched when I'm proven human.

I feel one of you is a wolf but which one. So the lynching of either of you could provide info on the other.

You do realize that you have based your accusation of him off of the idea that he knows me to be human.

Part of it, Yes. That's why it would be interesting to see what he is. If he is wolf then you look a little better in my eyes.

Lassr wrote:

Remus West wrote:

Lassr wrote:

Remus West wrote:

Lassr wrote:

tru1cy wrote:

Vorret wrote:Gotcha.
Makes sense.

The reasons for going against Tru1cy are weak though

Its a waste of a vote, but I won't fight it. Its all data for the end game anyway

and maybe I'm mis-remembering but I don't recall tru1cy capitulating this quickly before.

that's what I'm going on.

I'm also good with voting Remus.

This makes absolutely no sense at all. You voting tru1cy based off the idea that he appears to KNOW I'm not a wolf yet you are also willing to vote for me. Feels like you are trying to make sure tru1cy gets lynched when I'm proven human.

I feel one of you is a wolf but which one. So the lynching of either of you could provide info on the other.

You do realize that you have based your accusation of him off of the idea that he knows me to be human.

Part of it, Yes. That's why it would be interesting to see what he is. If he is wolf then you look a little better in my eyes.

But if he's human we may have made a big blunder.
I hate to say this but... wouldn't Remus be a better test at this stage, knowing his history?

Lassr wrote:

Vorret wrote: Lassr hasn't been making any sense since this thing started to be honest, throwing random accusation left and right hoping something sticks.

Really? Nothing at all?

Fine that was harsh, I read the whole thread again and you do poke a bit (as I did) so that was uncalled for.

Vorret wrote:

Lassr wrote:

Remus West wrote:

Lassr wrote:

Remus West wrote:

Lassr wrote:

tru1cy wrote:

Vorret wrote:Gotcha.
Makes sense.

The reasons for going against Tru1cy are weak though

Its a waste of a vote, but I won't fight it. Its all data for the end game anyway

and maybe I'm mis-remembering but I don't recall tru1cy capitulating this quickly before.

that's what I'm going on.

I'm also good with voting Remus.

This makes absolutely no sense at all. You voting tru1cy based off the idea that he appears to KNOW I'm not a wolf yet you are also willing to vote for me. Feels like you are trying to make sure tru1cy gets lynched when I'm proven human.

I feel one of you is a wolf but which one. So the lynching of either of you could provide info on the other.

You do realize that you have based your accusation of him off of the idea that he knows me to be human.

Part of it, Yes. That's why it would be interesting to see what he is. If he is wolf then you look a little better in my eyes.

But if he's human we may have made a big blunder.
I hate to say this but... wouldn't Remus be a better test at this stage, knowing his history?

I started with Remus but that vote stalled and went no where.

Vorret wrote:

Lassr wrote:

Vorret wrote: Lassr hasn't been making any sense since this thing started to be honest, throwing random accusation left and right hoping something sticks.

Really? Nothing at all?

Fine that was harsh, I read the whole thread again and you do poke a bit (as I did) so that was uncalled for.

No, if that's how you felt then say it. No need to apologize. It's a game. I take nothing personal on here....asshole. .

Vorret wrote:But if he's human we may have made a big blunder.
I hate to say this but... wouldn't Remus be a better test at this stage, knowing his history?

This from the same guy who just said that using tru1cy's history against him was not a strong basis? Interesting that you are willing to do so against the "soft" target - who also happens to be the only one voting for you.

Remus West wrote:

Vorret wrote:But if he's human we may have made a big blunder.
I hate to say this but... wouldn't Remus be a better test at this stage, knowing his history?

This from the same guy who just said that using tru1cy's history against him was not a strong basis? Interesting that you are willing to do so against the "soft" target - who also happens to be the only one voting for you.

Haha, foot in mouth moment.
But why wouldn't I try a jab at you since you're voting for me ?

46 hours remaining....beep....beep....beeeeep


Queue the 24 hour clock in 22 hours

Nothing I've seen gives me any reason to change my vote at this time.