That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
Reaction shots after every offensive play, as he sits next to Kraft and Co.Ralph-Wiggum wrote:What I want to is whether, during his suspension, Brady will stand or sit when the National Anthem is played on TV...
Oh sure, keeping bringing that up.ImLawBoy wrote:I think it might be a good idea to move the Kaepernick protest discussion
I thought my comment was football oriented and not political. A player says/does something controversial and there's blowback. The controversy could be about anything, in this case it was the national anthem thing. I was just pointing out that his timing causes me to doubt he actually even cares about the cause he is supposedly supporting. The season is about to start and he's fighting for his job, these are two things happening now that weren't happening before. So I'm saying that's why now is when he's brought up this cause. I think it's a cynical move intended to raise his profile in the game at a time where he's afraid he's losing his place in the game, that's not talking politics is it?ImLawBoy wrote:I think it might be a good idea to move the Kaepernick protest discussion to a separate thread in R&P. That way the issue can be fully discussed, while those who just want to discuss the games (and, of course, important rules changes) can do so here.
Just a suggestion at this point.
Only if the next time Brady/Deflatgate bubbles up, we move that idiotic topic tooLordMortis wrote:Oh sure, keeping bringing that up.ImLawBoy wrote:I think it might be a good idea to move the Kaepernick protest discussion
Except that you're wrong if you actually listen to Kaepernick speak. He's obviously very passionate about this issue, though I did have the same concerns previously.gameoverman wrote:I thought my comment was football oriented and not political. A player says/does something controversial and there's blowback. The controversy could be about anything, in this case it was the national anthem thing. I was just pointing out that his timing causes me to doubt he actually even cares about the cause he is supposedly supporting. The season is about to start and he's fighting for his job, these are two things happening now that weren't happening before. So I'm saying that's why now is when he's brought up this cause. I think it's a cynical move intended to raise his profile in the game at a time where he's afraid he's losing his place in the game, that's not talking politics is it?ImLawBoy wrote:I think it might be a good idea to move the Kaepernick protest discussion to a separate thread in R&P. That way the issue can be fully discussed, while those who just want to discuss the games (and, of course, important rules changes) can do so here.
Just a suggestion at this point.
He must be, I mean it must be grueling to sit for the entire national anthem. Such a cross to bare.Pyperkub wrote:Except that you're wrong if you actually listen to Kaepernick speak. He's obviously very passionate about this issue, though I did have the same concerns previously.gameoverman wrote:I thought my comment was football oriented and not political. A player says/does something controversial and there's blowback. The controversy could be about anything, in this case it was the national anthem thing. I was just pointing out that his timing causes me to doubt he actually even cares about the cause he is supposedly supporting. The season is about to start and he's fighting for his job, these are two things happening now that weren't happening before. So I'm saying that's why now is when he's brought up this cause. I think it's a cynical move intended to raise his profile in the game at a time where he's afraid he's losing his place in the game, that's not talking politics is it?ImLawBoy wrote:I think it might be a good idea to move the Kaepernick protest discussion to a separate thread in R&P. That way the issue can be fully discussed, while those who just want to discuss the games (and, of course, important rules changes) can do so here.
Just a suggestion at this point.
You're asking for way too much. Actually listen. Come on now! He sat! How can he sit?!Pyperkub wrote:Except that you're wrong if you actually listen to Kaepernick speak. He's obviously very passionate about this issue, though I did have the same concerns previously.gameoverman wrote:I thought my comment was football oriented and not political. A player says/does something controversial and there's blowback. The controversy could be about anything, in this case it was the national anthem thing. I was just pointing out that his timing causes me to doubt he actually even cares about the cause he is supposedly supporting. The season is about to start and he's fighting for his job, these are two things happening now that weren't happening before. So I'm saying that's why now is when he's brought up this cause. I think it's a cynical move intended to raise his profile in the game at a time where he's afraid he's losing his place in the game, that's not talking politics is it?ImLawBoy wrote:I think it might be a good idea to move the Kaepernick protest discussion to a separate thread in R&P. That way the issue can be fully discussed, while those who just want to discuss the games (and, of course, important rules changes) can do so here.
Just a suggestion at this point.
Like I said, just a suggestion. I suspect most people know whether they really want to discuss the political or sports aspects of the situation, and when they're using one as a cover for the other. I also know that there's obviously some overlap here, which is why I'm not interested in enforcing anything right now.gameoverman wrote:I thought my comment was football oriented and not political. A player says/does something controversial and there's blowback. The controversy could be about anything, in this case it was the national anthem thing. I was just pointing out that his timing causes me to doubt he actually even cares about the cause he is supposedly supporting. The season is about to start and he's fighting for his job, these are two things happening now that weren't happening before. So I'm saying that's why now is when he's brought up this cause. I think it's a cynical move intended to raise his profile in the game at a time where he's afraid he's losing his place in the game, that's not talking politics is it?ImLawBoy wrote:I think it might be a good idea to move the Kaepernick protest discussion to a separate thread in R&P. That way the issue can be fully discussed, while those who just want to discuss the games (and, of course, important rules changes) can do so here.
Just a suggestion at this point.
C'mon, you know you're itching to.ImLawBoy wrote:Like I said, just a suggestion. I suspect most people know whether they really want to discuss the political or sports aspects of the situation, and when they're using one as a cover for the other. I also know that there's obviously some overlap here, which is why I'm not interested in enforcing anything right now.gameoverman wrote:I thought my comment was football oriented and not political. A player says/does something controversial and there's blowback. The controversy could be about anything, in this case it was the national anthem thing. I was just pointing out that his timing causes me to doubt he actually even cares about the cause he is supposedly supporting. The season is about to start and he's fighting for his job, these are two things happening now that weren't happening before. So I'm saying that's why now is when he's brought up this cause. I think it's a cynical move intended to raise his profile in the game at a time where he's afraid he's losing his place in the game, that's not talking politics is it?ImLawBoy wrote:I think it might be a good idea to move the Kaepernick protest discussion to a separate thread in R&P. That way the issue can be fully discussed, while those who just want to discuss the games (and, of course, important rules changes) can do so here.
Just a suggestion at this point.
I'll be interested in seeing what the injury is since they had an ambulance carry him off.stessier wrote:Bridgewater's season may be over before it began - they immoblized his left knee after going down without contact and carted him from the field. Said to have been in agony.
My favorite part of the story is teammates dropped to their knees and started praying and swearing. I'm presuming it wasn't the same ones doing both actions.
I soEl Guapo wrote: C'mon, you know you're itching to.
this... swoonsBut the Broncos’ open quarterback competition has been just that — open — since March, when Manning retired, Brock Osweiler bolted and Mark Sanchez, a seventh-year vet, arrived to fill the void. It stayed open when the Broncos traded up to select their future in Paxton Lynch. And it still is open after the Broncos’ preseason victory at Chicago, where Sanchez and Siemian each played a quarter.
In his first officiating video of the year, NFL V.P. of officiating Dean Blandino explains that the league regards four weeks as a sufficient sample size for developing opinions regarding the impact of a rule change. He also said that, as to whether the touchback adjustment will decrease kickoff returns (which is the desired effect), the rate of returns in the preseason is irrelevant, because coaches want to evaluate their coverage and return units.
...
PFT previously has reported that the NFL most likely won’t change the rule during the season. Still, with plenty of coaches making clear their intent to attempt to prevent the opposing team from getting a free extra five yards of field position by taking a knee and starting at the 25, it won’t be a stretch if the facts after four weeks scream out to the league, “I told you so.”
I would enjoy that on multiple levels but am tempering my hopes at this point. Dak looks like he might be awesome, let's see how he handles being a rookie.Isgrimnur wrote:You know, I might actually watch some Cowboy games this year. The tears will be delicious.
Not going to happen, sorry to be the bearer of bad newsJaymann wrote:I'm hoping for a Broncos meltdown. Won't be enough to help the Chargers, but nonetheless.
With Sanchez on the sidelines, I expect a short leash.Enough wrote:I would enjoy that on multiple levels but am tempering my hopes at this point. Dak looks like he might be awesome, let's see how he handles being a rookie.Isgrimnur wrote:You know, I might actually watch some Cowboy games this year. The tears will be delicious.
Owner and general manager Jerry Jones indicated the Dallas Cowboys will keep Tony Romo on the team's active roster as the quarterback recovers from a compression fracture in his back.
"We don't have anybody valuable enough to take up that lost spot to give us the opportunity to see how [Romo] does," Jones told 105.3 The Fan in Dallas. "There's just not enough value there realistically to bring someone else in. That's the deciding factor. You don't have to spend a lot of time, going over and kind of circumcising a mosquito. ... There's nobody good enough to take that spot to give you a chance for that 'if' -- if [Romo] can come back."
...
The Cowboys will make Romo inactive for games until he is healthy. Until then, Dak Prescott will be the starter and Mark Sanchez is the backup. Romo remains in a back brace and he will undergo X-rays to check the healing process in the next week or so, according to Jones.
What if you need a mosquito circumcised, but time is not an issue? Hypothetically speaking.paulbaxter wrote:So if you need a mosquito circumcised quickly, he's your man.
Then you probably don't need to use a fly-by-night operation.El Guapo wrote:What if you need a mosquito circumcised, but time is not an issue? Hypothetically speaking.paulbaxter wrote:So if you need a mosquito circumcised quickly, he's your man.
Yeah, first thing I thought was, "Why is Tom Brady getting his own emoji among NFL teams?" Then I realized it was Seattle and their stupid 12th man.Ralph-Wiggum wrote:The viking helmet emoji is clearly the best. Seattle's is pretty lame.
So that's what stessier's/Katie Nolan's joke means? The Pats are claiming Seattle's emoji, too? I couldn't quite figure that one out . . . .Trent Steel wrote:Yeah, first thing I thought was, "Why is Tom Brady getting his own emoji among NFL teams?" Then I realized it was Seattle and their stupid 12th man.Ralph-Wiggum wrote:The viking helmet emoji is clearly the best. Seattle's is pretty lame.
