That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
Just the anticipation of it is pushing stocks back up.hepcat wrote:Today Trump is supposed to be giving a real policy speech. One in which he will answer questions about his plans for the economy.
What are the odds he just repeats the same narcissistic crap he's been spewing all along about how he'll fix things and we shouldn't worry about it because he's got the best mind?
eh, it depends. Trump does give a few prepared, pre-written speeches meant to give a presidential vibe, mixed in with all the improv[] bigotry. I'm guessing this will actually be more of a standard GOP nominee policy speech, especially what with the professional campaign guy (Manafort) firmly in charge now.hepcat wrote:Today Trump is supposed to be giving a real policy speech. One in which he will answer questions about his plans for the economy.
What are the odds he just repeats the same narcissistic crap he's been spewing all along about how he'll fix things and we shouldn't worry about it because he's got the best mind?
But he already has the best bigotry!El Guapo wrote:all the improve bigotry...
That depends on whether or not he uses a teleprompter.hepcat wrote:Today Trump is supposed to be giving a real policy speech. One in which he will answer questions about his plans for the economy.
What are the odds he just repeats the same narcissistic crap he's been spewing all along about how he'll fix things and we shouldn't worry about it because he's got the best mind?
What are you suggesting? Actually, I'm not sure I want to know. There is no good answer here.Rip wrote:Make America Wealthy Again.
As stocks shoot even higher.
No, contrast. They were told to make him look good.tgb wrote:Camouflage.
Doubling down on talking trash.
My Dear Mr. David Cameron:
Hello my good friend. Please be allowing me to introduce myself. I am known in my country as the Donald Trump, and you may have heard of me by that name or perhaps just The Donald. Recently it has come to my attention that the Mr. Ted Cruz who recently passed away was a distant relation of yours.
In going through some papers left behind as part of the Mr. Ted Cruz estate, we discovered that he bequeathed to you the large sum of $500,000 (372, 586 of your Pounds). As you I'm aure are aware, tranfer of Funds of such a Large Quantity is a complicated procedure, with many misundersanding rules.
We would like to Transfer these funds into your Bank account. Would you please be so kind as to Repond in like with the Account Number and Address? There is, of course, a slmall Transfer Fee of $50,000, which, due to International Law and Laws of the Unted States, can only be paid by way of a deposit into the Trump for Persident Campaign.
Please be so kind as to send a Money Order for $50000 along with your banking Information so that we may tranfer these funds forthwith.
Thanking you, My good friend
Donald J. Trump, Esq.
P.O. Box 57823
New York, NY 11235
Isn't that a serious deal? Like actually considered treasonous or something?Holman wrote:knowingly soliciting donations from non-U.S. citizens is illegal.
In a world where mis-handling Top Secret info isn't, does it matter?Unagi wrote:Isn't that a serious deal? Like actually considered treasonous or something?Holman wrote:knowingly soliciting donations from non-U.S. citizens is illegal.
Wasn't that a Yuge deal during the Clinton administration? Or was that another witch hunt?Unagi wrote:Isn't that a serious deal? Like actually considered treasonous or something?Holman wrote:knowingly soliciting donations from non-U.S. citizens is illegal.
Depends on whether you think foreigners buying the US government is more or less serious than the Secretary of State's itinerary for her week in Russia falling into "enemy" hands.Rip wrote:In a world where mis-handling Top Secret info isn't, does it matter?Unagi wrote:Isn't that a serious deal? Like actually considered treasonous or something?Holman wrote:knowingly soliciting donations from non-U.S. citizens is illegal.
Sorry but the SecState itinerary isn't TS/SI, discussion of and photos of NK nuclear facilities is in the particular case.GreenGoo wrote:Depends on whether you think foreigners buying the US government is more or less serious than the Secretary of State's itinerary for her week in Russia falling into "enemy" hands.Rip wrote:In a world where mis-handling Top Secret info isn't, does it matter?Unagi wrote:Isn't that a serious deal? Like actually considered treasonous or something?Holman wrote:knowingly soliciting donations from non-U.S. citizens is illegal.
Well, if you're going to break one fundraising rule, you might as well break them all. Might want to add in that they should donate now, while the pound is still worth more than the dollar, to get more bang for the, err, shilling.tgb wrote:
We would like to Transfer these funds into your Bank account. Would you please be so kind as to Repond in like with the Account Number and Address? There is, of course, a small Transfer Fee of $50,000, which, due to International Law and Laws of the Unted States, can only be paid by way of a deposit into the Trump for Persident Campaign.
Unbeknownst to customers at the time, though, even the printed materials handed out to seminar attendees were based on a lie. The Trump Institute copyrighted its publication, each page emblazoned with "Billionaire's Road Map to Success," and it distributed the materials to those who attended the seminars.
Yet much of the handbook's contents were lifted without attribution from an obscure how-to guide published by Success magazine in 1995 called "Real Estate Mastery System."
At least 20 pages of the Trump Institute book were copied entirely or in large part from "Real Estate Mastery System." Even some of its hypothetical scenarios — "Seller A is asking $80,000 for a single-payer residence" — were repeated verbatim.
Finally a poll that matters.The tables have turned in this week’s White House Watch. After trailing Hillary Clinton by five points for the prior two weeks, Donald Trump has now taken a four-point lead.
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey of Likely U.S. Voters finds Trump with 43% of the vote, while Clinton earns 39%. Twelve percent (12%) still like another candidate, and five percent (5%) are undecided.
Last week at this time, it was Clinton 44%, Trump 39%. This is Trump’s highest level of support in Rasmussen Reports’ matchups with Clinton since last October. His support has been hovering around the 40% mark since April, but it remains to be seen whether he’s just having a good week or this actually represents a real move forward among voters.
Trump now earns 75% support among his fellow Republicans and picks up 14% of the Democratic vote. Seventy-six percent (76%) of Democrats like Clinton, as do 10% of GOP voters. Both candidates face a sizable number of potential defections because of unhappiness with them in their own parties.
Max Peck wrote:Judging by their 2012 track record, they just called the election for Clinton.
Rip wrote: It's too early for polls to matter then.
The decision was 5-3. With zombie Scalia it would have been 5-4.Donald Trump wrote:Now if we had — Scalia was living or if Scalia was replaced by me, you wouldn’t have had that. Okay? It would’ve been the opposite.
He's shorter than Gingrich and Trump, so... yes?hepcat wrote:Can Christie even fit on a short list?
Yes, but not a narrow one.hepcat wrote:Can Christie even fit on a short list?