That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
The scourge of bone spurs. FIND THE CURE!!1!Isgrimnur wrote: ↑Fri Oct 19, 2018 5:27 pm Politico
The attorney, Kevin Downing, didn’t specify what the problem was in open court but a source familiar with the situation later explained the longtime GOP operative who has been confined since mid-June is dealing with an issue related to his diet and has inflammation in his foot.
Probably the rich man's disease.Holman wrote: ↑Fri Oct 19, 2018 5:31 pmThe scourge of bone spurs. FIND THE CURE!!1!Isgrimnur wrote: ↑Fri Oct 19, 2018 5:27 pm Politico
The attorney, Kevin Downing, didn’t specify what the problem was in open court but a source familiar with the situation later explained the longtime GOP operative who has been confined since mid-June is dealing with an issue related to his diet and has inflammation in his foot.
We might need to investigate the investigation.President Donald Trump's critics have spent the past 17 months anticipating what some expect will be among the most thrilling events of their lives: special counsel Robert Mueller’s final report on Russian 2016 election interference.
They may be in for a disappointment.
That’s the word POLITICO got from defense lawyers working on the Russia probe and more than 15 former government officials with investigation experience spanning Watergate to the 2016 election case. The public, they say, shouldn’t expect a comprehensive and presidency-wrecking account of Kremlin meddling and alleged obstruction of justice by Trump — not to mention an explanation of the myriad subplots that have bedeviled lawmakers, journalists and amateur Mueller sleuths.
Perhaps most unsatisfying: Mueller’s findings may never even see the light of day.
I think somehow, some way the investigation was corrupted. Maybe someone got to Muller, or there was some sort of back room deal.Kraken wrote: ↑Fri Oct 19, 2018 6:41 pm Reports were circulating a day or two ago that Mueller will release the results of his investigation shortly after the midterms. Speculation about what form they would take was all over the map. Ah, here's one: Mueller report PSA: Prepare for disappointment.
We might need to investigate the investigation.President Donald Trump's critics have spent the past 17 months anticipating what some expect will be among the most thrilling events of their lives: special counsel Robert Mueller’s final report on Russian 2016 election interference.
They may be in for a disappointment.
That’s the word POLITICO got from defense lawyers working on the Russia probe and more than 15 former government officials with investigation experience spanning Watergate to the 2016 election case. The public, they say, shouldn’t expect a comprehensive and presidency-wrecking account of Kremlin meddling and alleged obstruction of justice by Trump — not to mention an explanation of the myriad subplots that have bedeviled lawmakers, journalists and amateur Mueller sleuths.
Perhaps most unsatisfying: Mueller’s findings may never even see the light of day.
You probably don’t know me, but like you I am one of those .01%ers, a proud and unapologetic capitalist...
...let’s speak frankly to each other. I’m not the smartest guy you’ve ever met, or the hardest-working. I was a mediocre student. I’m not technical at all—I can’t write a word of code. What sets me apart, I think, is a tolerance for risk and an intuition about what will happen in the future. Seeing where things are headed is the essence of entrepreneurship. And what do I see in our future now?
I see pitchforks.
At the same time that people like you and me are thriving beyond the dreams of any plutocrats in history, the rest of the country—the 99.99 percent—is lagging far behind. The divide between the haves and have-nots is getting worse really, really fast. In 1980, the top 1 percent controlled about 8 percent of U.S. national income. The bottom 50 percent shared about 18 percent. Today the top 1 percent share about 20 percent; the bottom 50 percent, just 12 percent.
But the problem isn’t that we have inequality. Some inequality is intrinsic to any high-functioning capitalist economy. The problem is that inequality is at historically high levels and getting worse every day. Our country is rapidly becoming less a capitalist society and more a feudal society. Unless our policies change dramatically, the middle class will disappear, and we will be back to late 18th-century France. Before the revolution.
I really hope I am. Because I am now too infirm to effectively use a rifle. For years I had hoped to see the shit hit the fan while I was still young and vital. I'm 36 now, and had two shoulder surgeries on my left shoulder. I'm going to be damn near worthless when the *snicker* proletariat revolution finally arrives.Pyperkub wrote: ↑Mon Oct 22, 2018 6:43 pm Yes you are, but you may not be wrong (I think you are, for now).
However, this read from 2014 (!) still echoes loudly (even more loudly than then):
You probably don’t know me, but like you I am one of those .01%ers, a proud and unapologetic capitalist...
...let’s speak frankly to each other. I’m not the smartest guy you’ve ever met, or the hardest-working. I was a mediocre student. I’m not technical at all—I can’t write a word of code. What sets me apart, I think, is a tolerance for risk and an intuition about what will happen in the future. Seeing where things are headed is the essence of entrepreneurship. And what do I see in our future now?
I see pitchforks.
At the same time that people like you and me are thriving beyond the dreams of any plutocrats in history, the rest of the country—the 99.99 percent—is lagging far behind. The divide between the haves and have-nots is getting worse really, really fast. In 1980, the top 1 percent controlled about 8 percent of U.S. national income. The bottom 50 percent shared about 18 percent. Today the top 1 percent share about 20 percent; the bottom 50 percent, just 12 percent.
But the problem isn’t that we have inequality. Some inequality is intrinsic to any high-functioning capitalist economy. The problem is that inequality is at historically high levels and getting worse every day. Our country is rapidly becoming less a capitalist society and more a feudal society. Unless our policies change dramatically, the middle class will disappear, and we will be back to late 18th-century France. Before the revolution.
+1Kraken wrote: ↑Mon Oct 22, 2018 7:12 pm I've said all along that I will accept Mueller's findings whether I agree with them or not, and I don't see any reason to change my mind about that. But they do have to tell me what they are. I own a pitchfork and I'm not afraid to wave it around in a menacing fashion.
When that article was originally posted someone else posted and an article in close proximity where I learned the expression "Everything is fine until it's not." When I was younger it felt like everything was going to the dogs, but the journey was still happening. Now it feels the dogs have been fed and we're one trigger from "until it's not."Pyperkub wrote: ↑Mon Oct 22, 2018 6:43 pm
However, this read from 2014 (!) still echoes loudly (even more loudly than then):
Wife has never fired a gun in her life, but for the past few weeks she's been talking darkly about the coming revolution. Today I comparison shopped local firearms training courses. The best price would be $350 for the two of us to get certified -- that's four hours of one-on-one (well, one-on-two in this case) classroom and live-fire instruction. After that, we could apply for a license to carry for $100 each. Then, if the local police chief approves, we could buy a couple of handguns. Probably looking at close to $1,000 altogether, but I'm thinking strongly about taking at least the first step.YellowKing wrote: ↑Mon Oct 22, 2018 7:50 pm I overheard two Trump supporters at work the other day cackling about how the LIBRULZ could never defeat them because "we have all the bullets." Howling with laughter. It made me want to shove a knife through their eye socket.
Buying guns for a revolution is stupid. Odds of successfully taking on the U.S. military with various small arms is close to zero, and either way you would wind up devastating the local area (both economically and physically).Kraken wrote: ↑Mon Oct 22, 2018 10:56 pmWife has never fired a gun in her life, but for the past few weeks she's been talking darkly about the coming revolution. Today I comparison shopped local firearms training courses. The best price would be $350 for the two of us to get certified -- that's four hours of one-on-one (well, one-on-two in this case) classroom and live-fire instruction. After that, we could apply for a license to carry for $100 each. Then, if the local police chief approves, we could buy a couple of handguns. Probably looking at close to $1,000 altogether, but I'm thinking strongly about taking at least the first step.YellowKing wrote: ↑Mon Oct 22, 2018 7:50 pm I overheard two Trump supporters at work the other day cackling about how the LIBRULZ could never defeat them because "we have all the bullets." Howling with laughter. It made me want to shove a knife through their eye socket.
When the chief asks us why we want licenses, I must remember to say "for target practice and home defense" and not say against whom.
I have no plans to storm the castle. I'm more worried about the guy down the street with all the Trump signs. If shit breaks loose it's going to be neighbor-against-neighbor.El Guapo wrote: ↑Tue Oct 23, 2018 1:05 amBuying guns for a revolution is stupid. Odds of successfully taking on the U.S. military with various small arms is close to zero, and either way you would wind up devastating the local area (both economically and physically).Kraken wrote: ↑Mon Oct 22, 2018 10:56 pmWife has never fired a gun in her life, but for the past few weeks she's been talking darkly about the coming revolution. Today I comparison shopped local firearms training courses. The best price would be $350 for the two of us to get certified -- that's four hours of one-on-one (well, one-on-two in this case) classroom and live-fire instruction. After that, we could apply for a license to carry for $100 each. Then, if the local police chief approves, we could buy a couple of handguns. Probably looking at close to $1,000 altogether, but I'm thinking strongly about taking at least the first step.YellowKing wrote: ↑Mon Oct 22, 2018 7:50 pm I overheard two Trump supporters at work the other day cackling about how the LIBRULZ could never defeat them because "we have all the bullets." Howling with laughter. It made me want to shove a knife through their eye socket.
When the chief asks us why we want licenses, I must remember to say "for target practice and home defense" and not say against whom.
If you're going to overthrow tyranny, it's going to have to be nonviolently. I'd buy stuff more like gas masks and survival supplies. Invest in a VPN and other data security. Other stuff like that.
True. America is probably too lazy for armed insurrection. We'd be calling truces at 8pm so we could all go home and watch Dancing With the Stars.Zarathud wrote:I am 1/2 mile from the nearest police station. Not worried about armed revolution until young people actually get off their ass to vote, and still lose.
Yeah, but then people watching Dancing with the Stars almost went into armed rebellion when Tinashe went home instead of Grocery Store Joe.YellowKing wrote: ↑Tue Oct 23, 2018 8:06 amTrue. America is probably too lazy for armed insurrection. We'd be calling truces at 8pm so we could all go home and watch Dancing With the Stars.Zarathud wrote:I am 1/2 mile from the nearest police station. Not worried about armed revolution until young people actually get off their ass to vote, and still lose.
While buying guns for a revolution is stupid buying guns to protect yourself against people determined to burn down their backyard might not be the worst idea at this point in history, depending on where your backyard is.El Guapo wrote: ↑Tue Oct 23, 2018 1:05 am Buying guns for a revolution is stupid. Odds of successfully taking on the U.S. military with various small arms is close to zero, and either way you would wind up devastating the local area (both economically and physically).
If you're going to overthrow tyranny, it's going to have to be nonviolently. I'd buy stuff more like gas masks and survival supplies. Invest in a VPN and other data security. Other stuff like that.
I'm not sure that not voting is the line between violent disenfranchisement and pacifism.
That's what I'm seeing. It's not about taking on the US Government. It's about defense against armed individuals that would do you harm.Kraken wrote: ↑Tue Oct 23, 2018 2:37 amI have no plans to storm the castle. I'm more worried about the guy down the street with all the Trump signs. If shit breaks loose it's going to be neighbor-against-neighbor.El Guapo wrote: ↑Tue Oct 23, 2018 1:05 amBuying guns for a revolution is stupid. Odds of successfully taking on the U.S. military with various small arms is close to zero, and either way you would wind up devastating the local area (both economically and physically).Kraken wrote: ↑Mon Oct 22, 2018 10:56 pmWife has never fired a gun in her life, but for the past few weeks she's been talking darkly about the coming revolution. Today I comparison shopped local firearms training courses. The best price would be $350 for the two of us to get certified -- that's four hours of one-on-one (well, one-on-two in this case) classroom and live-fire instruction. After that, we could apply for a license to carry for $100 each. Then, if the local police chief approves, we could buy a couple of handguns. Probably looking at close to $1,000 altogether, but I'm thinking strongly about taking at least the first step.YellowKing wrote: ↑Mon Oct 22, 2018 7:50 pm I overheard two Trump supporters at work the other day cackling about how the LIBRULZ could never defeat them because "we have all the bullets." Howling with laughter. It made me want to shove a knife through their eye socket.
When the chief asks us why we want licenses, I must remember to say "for target practice and home defense" and not say against whom.
If you're going to overthrow tyranny, it's going to have to be nonviolently. I'd buy stuff more like gas masks and survival supplies. Invest in a VPN and other data security. Other stuff like that.
I already own a couple of long guns that I inherited from my dad, but IDK if I can legally have them or buy ammunition for them. I'd like to teach Wife to shoot them. Getting licensed would probably be prudent.
They certainly don't have all the bullets.YellowKing wrote: ↑Mon Oct 22, 2018 7:50 pm I overheard two Trump supporters at work the other day cackling about how the LIBRULZ could never defeat them because "we have all the bullets." Howling with laughter. It made me want to shove a knife through their eye socket.
Oh and I prefer to do all my armed insurrection AFTER I see "lets make a deal" in the morning, so can we maybe wait till daytime TV starts?YellowKing wrote: ↑Tue Oct 23, 2018 8:06 amTrue. America is probably too lazy for armed insurrection. We'd be calling truces at 8pm so we could all go home and watch Dancing With the Stars.Zarathud wrote:I am 1/2 mile from the nearest police station. Not worried about armed revolution until young people actually get off their ass to vote, and still lose.
Sooo... They got to Muller or someone to either scale back the investigation or throw out evidence. The rule of law will be erroded until the average person knows that the only way out is to resist. Grreat... *sighs*Max Peck wrote: ↑Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:40 am What To Expect When You’re Expecting a Mueller Report
tl;dr:
- There will be a Mueller Report.
- The public probably won’t see it.
- There probably will also be a Rosenstein Report.
- The Rosenstein Report probably will be made public, but it’s not a sure thing.
- Rosenstein may be disinclined to disclose much information.
- If there’s an Impeachment Report, it probably will be something different.
Huh. Thats why you say it's a fantasy of mine. Because I keep saying its coming.
Because you constantly see evidence that it's on its way in things that don't contain that evidence. It's like a Rorschach test. You keep looking at the ink blots and seeing Thunderdome.
Burkman is a noted conspiracy theorist (tied to some of the Seth Rich stuff), and Trump sycophant and investment fraud Jacob Wohl is heavily involved in this as well.An alleged scheme to pay off women to fabricate sexual assault allegations against Special Counsel Robert Mueller has been referred to the FBI for further investigation, a spokesman for the special counsel’s office told The Atlantic. “When we learned last week of allegations that women were offered money to make false claims about the Special Counsel, we immediately referred the matter to the FBI for investigation,” the spokesman, Peter Carr, told me in an email on Tuesday.
...
The woman explained that she was contacted by a man “with a British accent” who wanted to ask her “a couple questions about Robert Mueller, whom I worked with when I was a paralegal for Pillsbury, Madison, and Sutro in 1974. I asked him who he was working for, and he told me his boss was some sort of politics guy in Washington named Jack Burkman. I reluctantly told [him] that I had only worked with Mr. Mueller for a short period of time, before leaving that firm to have my first son.”
...
The woman was not willing to speak to the reporters by phone, according to Scott Stedman, one of the reporters who received the letter. So portions of her story have gone uncorroborated. Around the time that the journalists began receiving the email, Burkman released a video on his Facebook page claiming, without evidence, that Mueller “has a whole lifetime history of harassing women.” On Tuesday, the day the special counsel revealed that it had referred the woman’s claims to the FBI, Burkman tweeted a similar allegation.
In an emailed statement, Burkman denied knowing the woman who originally alerted journalists to the alleged scheme and called the FBI referral “a joke, mueller wants to deflect attention from his sex assault troubles by attacking me.” He added in a separate email that “on Thursday 1200 NOON ROSSYLN HOLIDAY INN we will present a very credible witness who will allege that Mr. Mueller committed against her a sexual assault.” Mueller’s spokesman reiterated that the claims are false.
Sounds like a normal citizen with an interest in the truth.Burkman drew significant media attention for organizing a protest against the Dallas Cowboys NFL football team after it signed Michael Sam, an openly gay football player to its practice squad. He is the host of the radio show Behind the Curtain on Radio America.
He's a habitual Trump retweeter, ass kisser, and conspiracy theorist.LordMortis wrote: ↑Tue Oct 30, 2018 3:11 pm Isn't Jacob Wohl a Trump family friend and multinational Trump financier? Or am I conflating other Trump family "friends"
