Re: [Health] The Infectious Diseases Thread
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2021 4:39 pm
I'm not fancy enough for a chiffon mask, dahling.
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
Thanks, I'll look into it.Max Peck wrote: Thu Feb 11, 2021 12:02 pmHave you looked at any of the "ear saver" options? Typically, they are some sort of band that hooks onto the ear loops so that the mask doesn't need to rely on the ears to stay in place.Jeff V wrote: Thu Feb 11, 2021 10:52 am My daughter has problems with a single mask...her ears are too floppy and they just don't do a good job keeping the loops from slipping right off. FWIW, the double-mask advice is for those who have problems getting a single one to fit properly.
That's what happens when there are nearly 500,000 dead Americans.dbt1949 wrote: Thu Feb 11, 2021 5:34 pm So now you have to get two shots and wear two-three masks and keep social distancing.
Some boot bands that I had on hand were my go-to ear loop hack before I found some ear-saver bands that suited me.
i have two pairs that do not fit well, so i'm going to cut the loops in the middle on each and convert them to 'tie' attachmentsDaehawk wrote: Fri Feb 12, 2021 4:10 pm The elastic bands on my mask are stretched. It kept falling down today. Going to have to tie a knot in them.
@NickClairmont1 wrote:Stick with me for a story about how the logic of lockdowns can turn into something really sinister.
It begins with a Golden Retriever named Neesha.
Neesha and her little pup sibling Harley were lost on an hike, taking in the outdoor air in the Wicklow Mountains.
If you've never been to Ireland, you should understand that these are 1) right near the city where most of the country lives and 2) the most beautiful thing you've ever seen.
The dogs had bolted, and the owners had only ben able to find Harley. They thought Neesha was dead. But miraculously, two doctors on a hike in Wicklow found Neesha almost two full weeks later.
She lost a third of her body weight, but now she is at home, snuggled up and warm with her family.
So far, so nothing-sinister. An incredibly sweet story of a pup that got home. But what I feel like a lot of my American friends don't know is that Europeans are living under lockdown restrictions we have never had here, with actual enforcement. So the dog-rescuing hero doctor?
Well you see, in Ireland, you can't go more than 5km from your house. It's not just notional either. 8000 fines have been given out in the little 4.5 million person Republic. You really aren't allowed out. You can't meet people outside, or take a long walk.
This has been the case since October, when a 6 week lockdown was announced to "save Christmas." That was extended and is now set to last until at least May. Most recently, for no scientific reason, the government has proposed lowering the 5km radius to 2km.
So in the Wicklow Mountains, a boutique hotel has been offering some of the only people allowed to be regarded as people instead of just viral vectors--healthcare workers--mental health retreats. You know, because the lockdowns are psychological torture.
Pretty cool that this mountain retreat of sanity was available to the doctors, in this country where everyone is unable to see friends even outside, and police check if you are too far from your house. But wait…
Some concerned citizen, a vigilant lockdown rules-enforcer, read the heartwarming story about doctors returning a stranded dog to its family and thought they should call the police.
Turns out, the hike may have been too long, so the doctors are under investigation and the hotel shut now.
Is the fact that any of this mutual surveillance and punishment is what following the rules looks like a sign of a healthy society?
Do my American friends know that in the UK right now, you can go jog in the park, but you can't meet anyone there, and you can't sit down? Much of Europe is living in what sounds like a paranoid fantasy prediction from what people here in the US said could happen.
Look at this dog. Look at her. Somebody saw this picture and thought, "Those criminals. I'm calling the cops."
For becoming a place where hotels offering retreats to exhausted doctors who save cold, sad, stranded Golden Retrievers get shut down after curtain-twitching lunatics call the police on them, Ireland currently has about the Covid death rate of Virginia.
It's effortless to judge others by their worst examples while judging ourselves by our best intentions, so perhaps they aren't all necessarily quite so malicious? Mike Rowe sensibly and coherently addresses the subject with all the discussions he's had regarding "Safety Third" and the costs of putting safety first, and I defy anyone to listen to what he has to say and come away thinking he (or others like him) seeks to kill off as many people as possible:Paingod wrote: Wed Feb 24, 2021 2:03 pm The places in the US that have simply decided to kill off as many people as possible through arrogance infuriate me. I simply don't understand how people can see HALF A MILLION DEAD and think "Pfft. I'm gonna go get drunk and party!"
The concern for healthcare workers' mental health is real. I don't know how they do it.![]()
People will change when it is no longer just a number. When their close friends or family members are part of the 20 millions, they'll change.Daehawk wrote: Wed Feb 24, 2021 6:59 pm I dont think people will change even if it gets to 20 million dead or more.
I think it was Colbert that observed that nationwide we're at peak Summer 2020 levels right now, in terms of COVID cases.YellowKing wrote: Thu Feb 25, 2021 12:11 pmIt's the first time since this began I've started to see a glimmer of hope.
it only seems low relative to ... last month:Smoove_B wrote: Thu Feb 25, 2021 12:20 pmI think it was Colbert that observed that nationwide we're at peak Summer 2020 levels right now, in terms of COVID cases.YellowKing wrote: Thu Feb 25, 2021 12:11 pmIt's the first time since this began I've started to see a glimmer of hope.
With the new variants circulating, things could get...interesting.
I think it was LordMortis who observed that when you were reporting the the numbers were inexplicable dropping.Smoove_B wrote: Thu Feb 25, 2021 12:20 pmI think it was Colbert that observed that nationwide we're at peak Summer 2020 levels right now, in terms of COVID cases.YellowKing wrote: Thu Feb 25, 2021 12:11 pmIt's the first time since this began I've started to see a glimmer of hope.
With the new variants circulating, things could get...interesting.
hitbyambulance wrote: Thu Feb 25, 2021 2:44 pmit only seems low relative to ... last month:Smoove_B wrote: Thu Feb 25, 2021 12:20 pmI think it was Colbert that observed that nationwide we're at peak Summer 2020 levels right now, in terms of COVID cases.YellowKing wrote: Thu Feb 25, 2021 12:11 pmIt's the first time since this began I've started to see a glimmer of hope.
With the new variants circulating, things could get...interesting.
![]()
Absolutely. The concern is that the floodgates are going to open and people will change their behaviors thinking we're at the finish line. We're definitely in a better spot, but we don't want to backslide; we need to continue to do what has been working.
Yeah, cases in NJ are trending up again. Not sure if it's a data "blip" or a new trend. We're ~2 weeks after Valentine's Day, though I'm not entire sure that was a driver like Xmas or the Superbowl. I guess we'll see soon enough, particularly now that the NYC variant is raising concerns.oopsie doopsie
We're also a few weeks into the drop and people, as you said, are throwing caution to the wind. I wonder if we're seeing Valentine's combined with a nationwide drop in precautions.Smoove_B wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 3:12 pm We're ~2 weeks after Valentine's Day, though I'm not entire sure that was a driver like Xmas or the Superbowl. I guess we'll see soon enough, particularly now that the NYC variant is raising concerns.
Keep in mind, the chief goal of living is not to merely stay alive. We all live and function with differing levels of risk equilibrium and personal risk assessment. Some people feel cautious driving in excess of the speed limit, while others routinely exceed it. Some routinely eat junk food, while others avoid it all costs. Some leap out of aircraft for fun and rely upon a large piece of thin cloth to carry them safely back to earth, while others would be horrified at the prospect. And so on and so forth…Sudy wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 8:05 pm I just don't get it. Even relatively mature, intelligent people I know are employing fewer precautions than recommended. My friend is dating new people. Like in the flesh, going on outings. Another long time friend celebrated when restaurants were allowed to re-open for dine-in. I understand; he's an extrovert and feels isolated. I get that life is fleeting, and putting things on hold indefinitely may be panic inducing, but I'm seriously starting to question my own sanity when I seem to be one of the few people left in my social/professional circle who gives a crap.
Covid didn't make me a hermit, it just revealed it suited me. NASA should just examine my life rather than doing long term Martian habitation studies in the desert.
Not necessarily, because the devil's in the details. To use one of Sudy's examples, one of his friends was eager to celebrate dining-in at a restaurant once the opportunity presented itself. But it's certainly not completely impossible to dine-in at a restaurant relatively safely, and doing so need not equate to necessarily increasing the risks for everyone around. Depending upon the prevalence of the virus in the restaurant's locale, the size of the restaurant, how suitably it's ventilated, the amount of space kept between customers, and countless other safety practices, it's hardly a foregone conclusion that the mere act of choosing to dine-in at said restaurant necessarily equates to automatically increasing the communal risks of everyone around.Blackhawk wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 12:34 amThe difference here is that while risk tolerance may be a personal thing, in this case the impact isn't personal, it's communal.
You're not just taking risks with yourself, you're increasing the risks for everyone around you, and everyone around them. That makes one person's risk another person's business.
OK, but keeping your language specific to the examples Sudy provided -- which is what I was specifically responding and referring to -- what exactly are you implying his friends did that warrants "time for society (or the law) to step in"? If the community in which Sudy resides legitimately chose to permit dine-in restaurant meals, and his friend's assessment of the risks involved prompted them to do so, how does that equate to said friend's risk tolerance creating "the breeding ground for disease" and "time for society to step in"?Zarathud wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 12:59 am If your risk tolerance creates the breeding ground for disease, it’s time for society to step in.
Why? Because your risk tolerance doesn’t take into account the public or facts or the law. It doesn’t matter if it comes from selfishness or stupidity. Your reckless driving is unacceptable from a public point of view.
I don't think they're selfish assholes. I think they have a poor perspective of the scope of this thing. I respect their right to risk their own health, to an extent. But I don't accept that they might make me sick, or my wife sick, or my parents sick, or an immunocompromised person sick, or any random person sick because they can't temporarily control their urge to participate in specific forms of non-essential activities. Am I afraid to die? Sure. Do I want to die? No... though I think I'm more at peace with it than some. But I'm not hiding away out of selfishness. I'm doing it because a dangerous disease is ravaging our entire population and I want to minimize its propagation. I don't think that makes me some kind of saint... as I said, it's easier for me than some due to my circumstances and inclinations. Rather, it's the bare minimum. And the responsible thing to do.Anonymous Bosch wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 10:26 pm The point being, risk is deeply personal and we all have a differing tolerance for risk. And risk equilibrium is defined by how one adjusts their behaviour to adapt to their circumstances. So if living like a hermit suits you but not your friends, that's fine. But it doesn't necessarily equate to them being thoughtlessly selfish and reckless assholes, even if you'd never dream of conducting yourself in a similar way as them. It's simply unreasonable and unrealistic to expect others to conduct themselves identically to whatever particular risk tolerance you happen to have developed over a lifetime of personal experiences.
Perhaps they do. And perhaps they assessed the risks of their behaviour, balanced them against the avoidance costs, and simply reached a different conclusion than you. But the behaviour you described doesn't necessarily strike me as the sort of egregious conduct worthy of entirely annihilating relationships with said friends over. So, assuming you wish to preserve your relationships with them, and they're otherwise coherent and responsible adults, it seems only reasonable to grant them the benefit of the doubt.Sudy wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 5:14 am I don't think they're selfish assholes. I think they have a poor perspective of the scope of this thing.
You seem to be relying upon the depersonalization of abstraction; keeping your language specific to the examples Sudy provided -- which is what I was specifically responding and referring to -- what exactly are you implying his friends did that makes them assholes and warrants "time for society (or the law) to step in"? Sudy himself said he did not think they're selfish assholes, so what exactly makes you so certain they are?Zarathud wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 1:20 pm You can be friends with assholes, but in the back of your mind you need to remember they’re assholes.
In today’s situation, I usually don’t see in person those who take risks. I am going to be less social with those who need to be out.