Re: The Apprentice Season 2 - The Second Presidency of Donald Trump
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 10:55 pm
Can't remember where but saw an article where Musk is disputing this and saying that they don't actually have the money.
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
Tell me you don't understand why FEMA was created without telling me you don't understand why FEMA was created. JFC a literal disaster is looming."FEMA is gonna be a whole big discussion very shortly, because I'd rather see the states takes care of their own problems."
We're already hosted in Canada. How much further afield did you have in mind?Jolor wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:28 pm Q: Should OO move our net presence to another provider/country to retain free communications? If so, how would we be able to continue to enable access to the US citizens?
I generally use the Russia/Ukraine analogue. Trump relates to Putin more than he does to Hitler.IceBear wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 8:42 am Given the similarities to the rise of the 3rd Reich and use being Austria in that example, it probably needs to be further away to be safe
They will be run by the private sector wirh a pure profit motive. Rare disease? Not worth researching. Can't commercialize the cure? Not worth researching. Not my company? No grant.$iljanus wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 5:39 pm The new training sessions and grant review will return…but we may not like it.
It seems clear that they're going to go after the Civil Rights Act and Americans with Disabilities Act. Welcome back to legal segregation.WYBaugh wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 7:32 pm https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-ex ... 5f2b834b9c
On Wednesday, President Donald Trump revoked a six-decade-old executive order designed to combat workplace discrimination by federal contractors, undoing a landmark labor standard that stretches back to the presidency of Lyndon Baines Johnson.
The rule Trump nuked, Executive Order 11246, forbade federal contractors from discriminating on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation or gender identity. It granted the Labor Department the power to enforce its provisions through a contracting standards office.
I think that's the same plan for the VA - ~30% reduction in force and then start outsourcing services to the private sector. I'm guessing in private health care organizations that coincidentally have heavy investments from private donors and a smattering of people in Congress - similar to the private prison situation.LawBeefaroni wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 10:38 am They will be run by the private sector wirh a pure profit motive
We've got 4 more years and the Earth is still undergoing climate change. I'm sure at least one or more Republican states will be affected by a major disaster during his term.Zarathud wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 12:47 am This is only because it is California in need rather than Florida.
WYBaugh wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 7:32 pm https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-ex ... 5f2b834b9c
The rule Trump nuked, Executive Order 11246, forbade federal contractors from discriminating on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation or gender identity. It granted the Labor Department the power to enforce its provisions through a contracting standards office.
Clearly discrimination is only shameful when it means that mediocre white males are excluded from something.raydude wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 11:28 am So yesterday acting administrator Janet Petro sent an email to NASA employees and contractors notifying them that NASA is closing all agency DEIA offices and DEIA-related contracts. But the email contained this nugget:
"These programs divided Americans by race, wasted taxpayer dollars, and resulted in shameful discrimination."
There are many who advocate a “more balanced” review process involving the industry point of view…LawBeefaroni wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 10:38 amThey will be run by the private sector wirh a pure profit motive. Rare disease? Not worth researching. Can't commercialize the cure? Not worth researching. Not my company? No grant.$iljanus wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 5:39 pm The new training sessions and grant review will return…but we may not like it.
Several of my clients have shared some of the internal communications with me. Most of them are following that OPM template pretty closely. The consistent refrain I've heard over the past two days is "to protect our people and our agency, we're doing everything we possibly can to stay of their retaliation radar".raydude wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 11:28 am So yesterday acting administrator Janet Petro sent an email to NASA employees and contractors notifying them that NASA is closing all agency DEIA offices and DEIA-related contracts. But the email contained this nugget:
"These programs divided Americans by race, wasted taxpayer dollars, and resulted in shameful discrimination."
Come to find out this clause is from the "template" provided by OPM: https://chcoc.gov/sites/default/files/O ... Orders.pdf
Ugh, even when I try to ignore the news I can't get away from Trump and his goons.
Does that mean they can also say "No I am not hiring you because you are white"?El Guapo wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 11:17 am I am debating now whether a federal contractor could now say to an interviewee - "No I am not hiring you because you are black / Jewish / etc." without breaking the law. I think federal civil rights statutes still prohibit that, although presumably they would not have to worry (at least for now) about being sued by DOJ. Might still have to worry about the state attorney general depending upon the state.
Of course not. That would be discrimination.Alefroth wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 1:55 pmDoes that mean they can also say "No I am not hiring you because you are white"?El Guapo wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 11:17 am I am debating now whether a federal contractor could now say to an interviewee - "No I am not hiring you because you are black / Jewish / etc." without breaking the law. I think federal civil rights statutes still prohibit that, although presumably they would not have to worry (at least for now) about being sued by DOJ. Might still have to worry about the state attorney general depending upon the state.
They will do whatever is deemed by management and shareholders to be the most profitable. Full stop.Smoove_B wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 10:01 pmThere are some that have suggested that this indeed a test for the media - how will they respond to what's just happened? Will they report on all the things these various agencies are responsible for - how they impact the lives of every American? Will they detail all the medical advancements that have come out of the NIH over the last 40+ years?Holman wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:17 pm A responsible media would investigate why MAGA sees public-health science as a threat.
Will they connect the dots on how this is all tied directly to Project 2025 - that everything that is happening can be connected to bullet-point objectives that were communicated in the giant document?
Or will they downplay and ignore what's been done because it's not "sexy" enough to grab eyeballs?
Technically it would be "reverse discrimination" which is now the only bad discrimination.Blackhawk wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 2:08 pmOf course not. That would be discrimination.Alefroth wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 1:55 pmDoes that mean they can also say "No I am not hiring you because you are white"?El Guapo wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 11:17 am I am debating now whether a federal contractor could now say to an interviewee - "No I am not hiring you because you are black / Jewish / etc." without breaking the law. I think federal civil rights statutes still prohibit that, although presumably they would not have to worry (at least for now) about being sued by DOJ. Might still have to worry about the state attorney general depending upon the state.
So...paper towel shortage?
It seems like we might already be sitting at 1.5 degrees of warming, so the fun/not fun at all stuff has begun. I think we will really start to see it on the next extreme El Nino that earth experiences, like I sort of hope I'm not here kind of bad. All of these cascading localized disasters are going to create an insurance disaster that will far precede the worst horrors of climate change so that by the time that stuff hits our econ will be in shatters and we will have much less elasticity to adjust. Shit got real and now we just put in place probably the single worse human in the single worse position on the planet to fight climate change.raydude wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 11:57 amWe've got 4 more years and the Earth is still undergoing climate change. I'm sure at least one or more Republican states will be affected by a major disaster during his term.Zarathud wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 12:47 am This is only because it is California in need rather than Florida.
NIH funding has a huge influence on universities and so it will be a test.Viktor Orban pacified Hungarian universities by tightening control over their funding. It went pretty smoothly. Trump is going the same way. We will see how many American academics will be ready to risk their careers in defense of #AcademicFreedom
.
In the Trump administration’s arguments defending his order to suspend birthright citizenship, the Justice Department called into question the citizenship of Native Americans born in the United States, citing a 19th-century law that excluded Native Americans from birthright citizenship.
In a case on Trump's birthright citizenship executive order coming out of Washington, Justice Department attorneys quote the 14th Amendment, which reads that “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside,” and hang their one of their arguments on the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”
Well, we've clearly seen that Trump is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States either.Max Peck wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 5:15 pm Did anyone have "Native Americans are not citizens" on their Trumpocalypse bingo card?
"Excluding Indians": Trump admin questions Native Americans' birthright citizenship in courtIn the Trump administration’s arguments defending his order to suspend birthright citizenship, the Justice Department called into question the citizenship of Native Americans born in the United States, citing a 19th-century law that excluded Native Americans from birthright citizenship.
In a case on Trump's birthright citizenship executive order coming out of Washington, Justice Department attorneys quote the 14th Amendment, which reads that “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside,” and hang their one of their arguments on the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”
Do you think he believes the bullshit or is he just a grifter?Enough wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 3:39 pm Looking at uni admins around the country, it does not give me great confidence that leadership will not kowtow to the orange one.
NIH funding has a huge influence on universities and so it will be a test.Viktor Orban pacified Hungarian universities by tightening control over their funding. It went pretty smoothly. Trump is going the same way. We will see how many American academics will be ready to risk their careers in defense of #AcademicFreedom
.
The crazy thing is I studied in Hungary on fellowship right when Orban's party was coming into power and let's just say they really flipped from the people I met when I was there. I even got to meet Fidesz folks like Orban himself in the early 90s. Back then they were raging idealists that would recoil in horror over the very same things they are doing now. It's wild to see how power apparently can corrupt one pretty thoroughly.
Another connection I have is one of my best friends in life turned out to be a maga talking head (Michael Shellenberger). When we were in high school he started an ACLU chapter and in college was a raging progressive. Now he is one of the main scribes of the twitter files for Elon, regularly appears on Fox, Rogan, etc. and even got a gig as Chair of Politics, Censorship, and Free Speech at the safe-space University of Austin that Bari Weiss has been grifting on. Seeing his descent hurts a lot. I was often in disagreement with him but very proud of him for his work when he was younger in working with Earth First in the redwoods and then later becoming a leading advocate for resuming nuclear energy. Now he comes to my state to help headline an anti-trans conference and as of late he's even gotten in on the UFO grift and has become something of a hero to the many ufo communities on reddit and elsewhere. Shit is so weird to see in person in one's life.
Back to their country of origin obviously.
They're "Western Indians" so one presumes they go to somewhere in the West Indies, probably Haiti given that there will already be a pipeline set up to deport Haitian refugees back where they came from.
What I’m saying is it comes down to is it worth putting something like this as a priority in terms of fighting back or is it better to focus on the most unrealistic nut case ideas like annexing Canada.Alefroth wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:57 pmYou think most Americans would support revoking birthright citizenship?waitingtoconnect wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:53 am The left needs to decide if it’s worth fighting trump on one of the few areas of trumps policy that most Americans could well support giving him airspace to do his meme coins and other highly questionable stuff.