Octopus Overlords

Mr Bubbles wrote:

stessier wrote:

Mr Bubbles wrote:

Chaosraven wrote:Oh for petes sake would somebody just lynch me already so these guys can be proven stupid?

And once again there is no gif that could truly articulate how much rolly eyes this comment should get.

And if he is a villager? No gif for the you'll feel?

Not really. If he is innocent the guy hasn't been a good villager. He's antagonized the last part of this vote. I put that squarely on him.

As I put getting yourself outed squarely on you.

stessier wrote:

Mr Bubbles wrote:

stessier wrote:

Mr Bubbles wrote:

Chaosraven wrote:Oh for petes sake would somebody just lynch me already so these guys can be proven stupid?

And once again there is no gif that could truly articulate how much rolly eyes this comment should get.

And if he is a villager? No gif for the you'll feel?

Not really. If he is innocent the guy hasn't been a good villager. He's antagonized the last part of this vote. I put that squarely on him.

As I put getting yourself outed squarely on you.

I didn't antagonize the voting block he did. I fail to see the similarities.

Mr Bubbles wrote:

stessier wrote:As I put getting yourself outed squarely on you.

I didn't antagonize the voting block he did. I fail to see the similarities.

Your poor play up to the point of the vote was a very bad move for a Villager - a horrendous move for the Seer.

stessier wrote:

Mr Bubbles wrote:

stessier wrote:As I put getting yourself outed squarely on you.

I didn't antagonize the voting block he did. I fail to see the similarities.

Your poor play up to the point of the vote was a very bad move for a Villager - a horrendous move for the Seer.

If you say so.. I played the same way I've always played for a deliberate reason. How is that horrendous. What would have been horrendous would have been to switch my playing style. the vote against me was way too fast for me to have any impact on it.

Mr Bubbles wrote:

stessier wrote:

Mr Bubbles wrote:

stessier wrote:As I put getting yourself outed squarely on you.

I didn't antagonize the voting block he did. I fail to see the similarities.

Your poor play up to the point of the vote was a very bad move for a Villager - a horrendous move for the Seer.

If you say so.. I played the same way I've always played for a deliberate reason. How is that horrendous. What would have been horrendous would have been to switch my playing style. the vote against me was way too fast for me to have any impact on it.

I've taken a deep breath and feel better.

I don't believe any of what I wrote. What I hate is people blaming others for their failures. Chaos didn't do anything wrong - it was our failure analysis that got him lynched. He played the same he's always played - especially at the end. I certainly didn't think he was a Wolf, but he seemed ready to move on. You didn't play poorly - we just saw what we wanted to.

So sorry.

stessier wrote:

Mr Bubbles wrote:

stessier wrote:

Mr Bubbles wrote:

stessier wrote:As I put getting yourself outed squarely on you.

I didn't antagonize the voting block he did. I fail to see the similarities.

Your poor play up to the point of the vote was a very bad move for a Villager - a horrendous move for the Seer.

If you say so.. I played the same way I've always played for a deliberate reason. How is that horrendous. What would have been horrendous would have been to switch my playing style. the vote against me was way too fast for me to have any impact on it.

I've taken a deep breath and feel better.

I don't believe any of what I wrote. What I hate is people blaming others for their failures. Chaos didn't do anything wrong - it was our failure analysis that got him lynched. He played the same he's always played - especially at the end. I certainly didn't think he was a Wolf, but he seemed ready to move on. You didn't play poorly - we just saw what we wanted to.

So sorry.

Don't worry about it. there is nothing in this game that is every so serious that I take it personal. That being said I felt he was egging things on. To me that is like self voting. Obviously I was wrong. But then again who isn't once in a while. I would have him go down fighting than say just vote me off so I can be done with it. I don't think it does anyone any good to give in. I've done it before, but it was mostly out of spite.

/rips page titled "evil CR tells"
/crumbles in ball, throws over shoulder

CR lynch - While I will say I sorry that we whiffed on that. I am not sorry for going after him. I am sorry that i am wrong. But he smelled evil. Maybe my radar was off. Sorry CR we whiffed on you...but you have to admit you came across as evil. And you really werent doing much to help the village...what could one think?

Stessier & Bubbles flap - The only thing that i thought of as odd with bubbles was he seemed to be following me around. But when i went back through it, i didnt feel/sense evil intentions with it..it was more....let me hide in plain sight. So not sure what you are talking about Stessier. If anything, i'd think his train was also driven by blowback by him disappearing last game. Again he seemed off, but not that badly off as stessier is suggesting. He was one of a couple of people whom i thought could have been our seer actually.

Bubbles - since i believe you to be the scanner...do us a favor and scan someone whom you think will be going the distance. Or someone who is really not on anyone's radar. Anything that can give us some further information. I wouldn't be surprised if you are tonights kill. And if you arent...then either your a dark mage or we have idiots as dark mages. Having said that, i do think you are our scanner.

At least now we have some info to work with and go off on.

Mr. Bubbles, do us all a favor and scan Remus.

bb2112 wrote:Mr. Bubbles, do us all a favor and scan Remus.

i'd actually be open to testing him tomorrow...dont like that push he's been doing on redrun..very counter-intuitive logic.

And Remus, good job not waiting until El G used his card. (That was sarcasm.)

Newcastle wrote:

bb2112 wrote:Mr. Bubbles, do us all a favor and scan Remus.

i'd actually be open to testing him tomorrow...dont like that push he's been doing on redrun..very counter-intuitive logic.

You had your chance to test him today. You didn't want to. Now let's find out about Remus for sure.

Ok I can see the following you, but I totally agreed with your assessments. They were spot on with the suspicions I had. Maybe I should have toned it back, but I usually play a more reckless style and I didn't want to stop there. I figured if I can establish myself at least day one, I would lower myself on the list of people to scan, but unfortunately I just wasn't able to stop the train, because work had kept me from spending too much time to rebuttal the accusations. I submitted my orders and there are for someone I

bb2112 wrote:

Newcastle wrote:

bb2112 wrote:Mr. Bubbles, do us all a favor and scan Remus.

i'd actually be open to testing him tomorrow...dont like that push he's been doing on redrun..very counter-intuitive logic.

You had your chance to test him today. You didn't want to. Now let's find out about Remus for sure.

Had higher priorities in CR actually. You cant honestly tell me that CR didnt give you even one iota of the creeps? Too many peopel here giving off vibes. Anyway, back to the drawing board.

Mr Bubbles wrote:Ok I can see the following you, but I totally agreed with your assessments. They were spot on with the suspicions I had. Maybe I should have toned it back, but I usually play a more reckless style and I didn't want to stop there. I figured if I can establish myself at least day one, I would lower myself on the list of people to scan, but unfortunately I just wasn't able to stop the train, because work had kept me from spending too much time to rebuttal the accusations. I submitted my orders and there are for someone I

Oh noes, he died midsentance!

Newcastle wrote:
Had higher priorities in CR actually. You cant honestly tell me that CR didnt give you even one iota of the creeps? Too many peopel here giving off vibes. Anyway, back to the drawing board.

Actually, no. CR did not give me the creeps. I avoided both his trains because I actually believed him.

bb2112 wrote:

Mr Bubbles wrote:Ok I can see the following you, but I totally agreed with your assessments. They were spot on with the suspicions I had. Maybe I should have toned it back, but I usually play a more reckless style and I didn't want to stop there. I figured if I can establish myself at least day one, I would lower myself on the list of people to scan, but unfortunately I just wasn't able to stop the train, because work had kept me from spending too much time to rebuttal the accusations. I submitted my orders and there are for someone I

Oh noes, he died midsentance!

Wow.. I don't even remember what I was going to say after that. Must have been a cut and paste mistake.

Mr Bubbles wrote:

bb2112 wrote:

Mr Bubbles wrote:Ok I can see the following you, but I totally agreed with your assessments. They were spot on with the suspicions I had. Maybe I should have toned it back, but I usually play a more reckless style and I didn't want to stop there. I figured if I can establish myself at least day one, I would lower myself on the list of people to scan, but unfortunately I just wasn't able to stop the train, because work had kept me from spending too much time to rebuttal the accusations. I submitted my orders and there are for someone I

Oh noes, he died midsentance!

Wow.. I don't even remember what I was going to say after that. Must have been a cut and paste mistake.

The rest of it wound up on a hockey forum.

theohall wrote: The rest of it wound up on a hockey forum.

That was...sub-optimal.

Any questions I may have had about Remus are answered.

You people are silly. I get yelled at for not voting Chaosraven. I had repeatedly pledged to vote him when he hit n-1. I kept to my word. This bothers you how? Screw you people. Feel free to send me next after CR and be in the hole 2 to nothing. You guys can bullhead your way to a very speedy lose by simply lynching everyone that disagrees with you rather than looking for those that want to push and prod at things.

As for not waiting for El Guapo, yeah, that is on me but in my defense, I really did not feel like listening to people bitch at me for not voting when El Guapo showed up to play the card and then voted the final vote. So again, screw you people, you have already made up your minds regarding me and anything I did today and likely anything I do tomorrow will be twisted to fit whatever scheme you want it to fit while the wolves sit back and laugh at you.

Such a testy game.. I can't help but laugh when I read half of these messages. Definitely a very interesting game.

Remus West wrote:You people are silly. I get yelled at for not voting Chaosraven. I had repeatedly pledged to vote him when he hit n-1. I kept to my word. This bothers you how? Screw you people. Feel free to send me next after CR and be in the hole 2 to nothing. You guys can bullhead your way to a very speedy lose by simply lynching everyone that disagrees with you rather than looking for those that want to push and prod at things.

As for not waiting for El Guapo, yeah, that is on me but in my defense, I really did not feel like listening to people bitch at me for not voting when El Guapo showed up to play the card and then voted the final vote. So again, screw you people, you have already made up your minds regarding me and anything I did today and likely anything I do tomorrow will be twisted to fit whatever scheme you want it to fit while the wolves sit back and laugh at you.

This is why I hope our seer scans you. I am afraid you are most likely to be lynched tomorrow, and I would rather not have another strike if the village is wrong. I personally don't think the village would be, but I guess I would prefer to have it confirmed.

And whatever happened to:

Remus West wrote: 1) I did not fight the lynch because I do not care if I get lynched or not.

What changed?

Remus West wrote:You people are silly. I get yelled at for not voting Chaosraven. I had repeatedly pledged to vote him when he hit n-1. I kept to my word. This bothers you how? Screw you people. Feel free to send me next after CR and be in the hole 2 to nothing. You guys can bullhead your way to a very speedy lose by simply lynching everyone that disagrees with you rather than looking for those that want to push and prod at things.

As for not waiting for El Guapo, yeah, that is on me but in my defense, I really did not feel like listening to people bitch at me for not voting when El Guapo showed up to play the card and then voted the final vote. So again, screw you people, you have already made up your minds regarding me and anything I did today and likely anything I do tomorrow will be twisted to fit whatever scheme you want it to fit while the wolves sit back and laugh at you.

Touchy are we? Dont recall anyone yelling at you.

/passes him a beer laced w/ a Rev Hempus special.

Nothing changed, bb2112. I did not mind being the target of the early run. Still don't. I do mind when folks essentially take everything I write and twist it around to fit their preconceived notions of me. I vote redrun and he essentially taunts everyone by saying he is in basically unlynchable today. If he had spent the day consistently accusing any other player yet never once voting for that player do you think it would have gone unquestioned? Yet I'm the only one willing to note that action on his part and due to my noting it I again get called a wolf.

And Newcastle, I'm a public employee. Thanks for trying to get me fired there.

But didn't CR essentially say the same thing? He said he was convinced you were evil, yet he never voted for you.

For that matter, I said Stess was evil, but never voted for him either. Does that make me evil? Or does it mean I threw out a red herring? Or did I just have other people I would prefer swing day one?

And no, just because I don't see the definitive proof that you see in RR's guilt does not mean he gets a pass for the rest of the game. That is simple minded and quite beneath you.

Remus West wrote: And Newcastle, I'm a public employee. Thanks for trying to get me fired there.

Actually, wouldn't it let you fit in more?

At least at my old job it would have for me. The only place I ever worked that didn't have a drug test. I am pretty convinced half of the employees would fail. Crazy.

bb2112 wrote:But didn't CR essentially say the same thing? He said he was convinced you were evil, yet he never voted for you.

For that matter, I said Stess was evil, but never voted for him either. Does that make me evil? Or does it mean I threw out a red herring? Or did I just have other people I would prefer swing day one?

And no, just because I don't see the definitive proof that you see in RR's guilt does not mean he gets a pass for the rest of the game. That is simple minded and quite beneath you.

Others said "player X is Evil" nobody else said it consistently without voting for the player.

and I wasn't talking about you giving him a pass, I was talking about how folks cite my targeting him as a reason for believing I'm guilty. You even said it was the same as lynching an unclaimed Seer - which is still BS.

Remus West wrote:You even said it was the same as lynching an unclaimed Seer - which is still BS.

Unclaimed or uncontested? Cause we lynch a lot of unclaimed Seers - but it's rarely our fault.

stessier wrote:

Remus West wrote:You even said it was the same as lynching an unclaimed Seer - which is still BS.

Unclaimed or uncontested? Cause we lynch a lot of unclaimed Seers - but it's rarely our fault.

Remus West wrote:You even said it was the same as lynching an unclaimed Seer - which is still BS.

No I didn't. I explained it to you several times. You refuse to get it.

Really, wolves? We take a week, so you're going to take a week?

I'll update the game tonight.

I'm going through a computer refresh at work so I can't update the game until I get home.

Remus West wrote:

bb2112 wrote:But didn't CR essentially say the same thing? He said he was convinced you were evil, yet he never voted for you.

For that matter, I said Stess was evil, but never voted for him either. Does that make me evil? Or does it mean I threw out a red herring? Or did I just have other people I would prefer swing day one?

And no, just because I don't see the definitive proof that you see in RR's guilt does not mean he gets a pass for the rest of the game. That is simple minded and quite beneath you.

Others said "player X is Evil" nobody else said it consistently without voting for the player.

and I wasn't talking about you giving him a pass, I was talking about how folks cite my targeting him as a reason for believing I'm guilty. You even said it was the same as lynching an unclaimed Seer - which is still BS.

RMC barely voted at all. Remus West says "GUILTY."

Oh wait. Remus West voted even less, so Remus West is GUILTY by his own words.

theohall wrote:Oh wait. Remus West voted even less, so Remus West is GUILTY by his own words.

You really need to work on your reading comprehension skills. I was talking about players saying a specific other player is evil and then not voting for them. I was not talking about the frequency of voting.

oh wait i'm not dead....kind of hoped that we'd be in the day phase right now....want to see if i get a useful card today...i swear i want to get to the next day just to see what card i get...like waiting for xmas day as a kid and unwrapping a present....

ah well, guess we'll have to wait....so uhm...wolves...hurry up will ya! or bubbles...or lassr...wherever the hangup is.....daddy needs a new card to smite the wolves!

theohall wrote:

Remus West wrote:

bb2112 wrote:But didn't CR essentially say the same thing? He said he was convinced you were evil, yet he never voted for you.

For that matter, I said Stess was evil, but never voted for him either. Does that make me evil? Or does it mean I threw out a red herring? Or did I just have other people I would prefer swing day one?

And no, just because I don't see the definitive proof that you see in RR's guilt does not mean he gets a pass for the rest of the game. That is simple minded and quite beneath you.

Others said "player X is Evil" nobody else said it consistently without voting for the player.

and I wasn't talking about you giving him a pass, I was talking about how folks cite my targeting him as a reason for believing I'm guilty. You even said it was the same as lynching an unclaimed Seer - which is still BS.

RMC barely voted at all. Remus West says "GUILTY."

Just because I am not a slut with my votes doesn't mean I don't care.

RMC wrote: Just because I am not a slut with my votes doesn't mean I don't care.

Oh, my favorite! A slut that does care.

bb2112 wrote:

RMC wrote: Just because I am not a slut with my votes doesn't mean I don't care.

Oh, my favorite! A slut that does care.

Dude. Total logic flaw.

"Just because I do not do A with my B doesn't mean I don't C."

The prior statement does not say anything about me actually doing C.

BB2112 must be a wolf, only a wolf could make such a logic flaw.
Besides that, he probably kicks small dogs, steal candy from children, hates Star Wars, and abuses W-40.

redrun wrote:

bb2112 wrote:

RMC wrote: Just because I am not a slut with my votes doesn't mean I don't care.

Oh, my favorite! A slut that does care.

Dude. Total logic flaw.

"Just because I do not do A with my B doesn't mean I don't C."

The prior statement does not say anything about me actually doing C.

BB2112 must be a wolf, only a wolf could make such a logic flaw.
Besides that, he probably kicks small dogs, steal candy from children, hates Star Wars, and abuses W-40.

Dear god! He abuses WD-40!!! Off with his head!