Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:23 am
Alright let's do JD.
He's from Ontario after all.
JD
He's from Ontario after all.
JD
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
Your attitude seems quite ... democratic.RMC wrote:Now come on Scoop. If Remus was a Dem, he would not ask for a self vote. He might, but not in this game, it is going too slow. Join me in voting for a silent. I think that is the best place for all votes tonight.Scoop20906 wrote:Seriously, anyone who says they are good with voting for me and then say they are good with voting for themselves??Remus West wrote:I'm good with voting for me, scoop, or bb2112.
I say this to you, sir!
Shoot Remus West
No.theohall wrote:Is anyone dead, yet?
Is this because of the holidays or not having a time limit?triggercut wrote:At this point I feel like I'm in a play by mail game of werewolf.
It feels like all but a few of us have quit on this game. I'd just like to play it out. At this point I don't even care who wins or loses all that much.
Wanna see something, really exciting?Scoop20906 wrote:Can we at least get the 6th vote on JD so we can get him to n-1?
PLEASE!!! Something need to happen Folks!
El Guapo wrote:Wanna see something, really exciting?Scoop20906 wrote:Can we at least get the 6th vote on JD so we can get him to n-1?
PLEASE!!! Something need to happen Folks!
I am against using Lincoln today. The target is immaterial to me. Today is the wrong time.Scoop20906 wrote:And thought Remus was against rez Lassr and now suddenly he is for it?
Did something slip you a campaign contribution or something, Remus?
And I think the holidays didn't help.Remus West wrote: Moliere, I don't think it is the lack of deadline that is making people not play. This has been an ongoing issue the last several games.
This too.El Guapo wrote:And I think the holidays didn't help.Remus West wrote: Moliere, I don't think it is the lack of deadline that is making people not play. This has been an ongoing issue the last several games.
Is it though? I don't disagree exactly, I'm just pondering the question. Obviously hitting a democrat is the best result, there's no disagreement on that. But is what's probably a low percentage shot at hitting a democrat that clears out a non-player better than a higher percentage shot that targets someone who is at least playing a little?Scoop20906 wrote:
It's dead weight and at this point that's just as bad.
I did not suggest voting for me. I said I was alright with it. Subtle but important difference. Voting for me is a certain miss. I'm fine with that on the assumption that we then follow the outline I gave wherein Lincoln rezzes today's lynch (assuming we miss) tomorrow. Thus I'll be alive tomorrow and known good. To me it is the difference between trying to set up the block and trying to get a bad guy. You want to try and set up the block then I'm fine with you voting for me. You want to try and find a bad guy then I suggest Scoop or bb2112. I'd actually suggest bb2112 over Scoop simply because if I'm wrong about him he makes a strong rez even if he is off base regarding me right now. Sorry for any offense there Scoop.Scoop20906 wrote:Remus, don't forget you are suggesting you vote for you too.
Look, what are we waiting for? People to start playing?
I'm 98% sure an absent player probably isn't a dem but an absent player also isn't voting or posting.
It's dead weight and at this point that's just as bad.
Why Rez a lynch instead of a night kill?Remus West wrote:I did not suggest voting for me. I said I was alright with it. Subtle but important difference. Voting for me is a certain miss. I'm fine with that on the assumption that we then follow the outline I gave wherein Lincoln rezzes today's lynch (assuming we miss) tomorrow. Thus I'll be alive tomorrow and known good. To me it is the difference between trying to set up the block and trying to get a bad guy. You want to try and set up the block then I'm fine with you voting for me. You want to try and find a bad guy then I suggest Scoop or bb2112. I'd actually suggest bb2112 over Scoop simply because if I'm wrong about him he makes a strong rez even if he is off base regarding me right now. Sorry for any offense there Scoop.Scoop20906 wrote:Remus, don't forget you are suggesting you vote for you too.
Look, what are we waiting for? People to start playing?
I'm 98% sure an absent player probably isn't a dem but an absent player also isn't voting or posting.
It's dead weight and at this point that's just as bad.
good point. Still saying we lynch Remus.bb2112 wrote:Why Rez a lynch instead of a night kill?Remus West wrote:I did not suggest voting for me. I said I was alright with it. Subtle but important difference. Voting for me is a certain miss. I'm fine with that on the assumption that we then follow the outline I gave wherein Lincoln rezzes today's lynch (assuming we miss) tomorrow. Thus I'll be alive tomorrow and known good. To me it is the difference between trying to set up the block and trying to get a bad guy. You want to try and set up the block then I'm fine with you voting for me. You want to try and find a bad guy then I suggest Scoop or bb2112. I'd actually suggest bb2112 over Scoop simply because if I'm wrong about him he makes a strong rez even if he is off base regarding me right now. Sorry for any offense there Scoop.Scoop20906 wrote:Remus, don't forget you are suggesting you vote for you too.
Look, what are we waiting for? People to start playing?
I'm 98% sure an absent player probably isn't a dem but an absent player also isn't voting or posting.
It's dead weight and at this point that's just as bad.
mostly because I did not look at the numbers and the possibility until after Lassr was killed and then when I did I was getting ready to offer myself as the target of the lynch. On quick reflection though, now that you mention it, I agree with your implication that a night kill would be a better choice as we will not have had the opportunity to hear their last words.bb2112 wrote:Why Rez a lynch instead of a night kill?Remus West wrote:I did not suggest voting for me. I said I was alright with it. Subtle but important difference. Voting for me is a certain miss. I'm fine with that on the assumption that we then follow the outline I gave wherein Lincoln rezzes today's lynch (assuming we miss) tomorrow. Thus I'll be alive tomorrow and known good. To me it is the difference between trying to set up the block and trying to get a bad guy. You want to try and set up the block then I'm fine with you voting for me. You want to try and find a bad guy then I suggest Scoop or bb2112. I'd actually suggest bb2112 over Scoop simply because if I'm wrong about him he makes a strong rez even if he is off base regarding me right now. Sorry for any offense there Scoop.Scoop20906 wrote:Remus, don't forget you are suggesting you vote for you too.
Look, what are we waiting for? People to start playing?
I'm 98% sure an absent player probably isn't a dem but an absent player also isn't voting or posting.
It's dead weight and at this point that's just as bad.
We aren't. Its either we poop the game or poop the silent.El Guapo wrote:All right, fine. Doesn't seem like we're going to vote for anyone else.
Withdraw RMC
JD