Page 17 of 23
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 9:51 am
by Remus West
I doubt this moves us in the right direction but since everyone has stopped posting I suppose the only option is
JD
I guess it comes down to that I'd rather lose to someone playing the game than not playing so we may as well be certain of the silent.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 10:02 am
by Vorret
Remus West wrote:I doubt this moves us in the right direction but since everyone has stopped posting I suppose the only option is
JD
I guess it comes down to that I'd rather lose to someone playing the game than not playing so we may as well be certain of the silent.
Uh?
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 10:26 am
by RMC
Vorret wrote:Remus West wrote:I doubt this moves us in the right direction but since everyone has stopped posting I suppose the only option is
JD
I guess it comes down to that I'd rather lose to someone playing the game than not playing so we may as well be certain of the silent.
Uh?
I think he is implying that the silents are mostly not the bad guys, as they still need to be active, therefore the totally silent ones are most likely just regular guys.
The ones to worry about are the ones that jump in, post something without any substance and then bounce back out. Kind of like me.
So while he hates to vote for a silent, as he doesn't think it provides any benefit, he will. So he is basically laying the ground work for plausible deniability. (How do you spell that???) Anyway that is my take.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 11:04 am
by Vorret
That makes more sense now, I understand the reasoning, we did get lucky a few times with silent wolves but in JD's case he's more than likely a regular republican BUT he's been more than silent so keeping him in the game is hurting us more than anything at the moment.
Now let's hope the wolves eats another silent and we can get the ball rolling again!
Also, I'm back from vacations (
) so more posting from me!
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 11:06 am
by Remus West
I doubt he is anything but mostly I'm annoyed that he has posted elsewhere but not bothered to even put in an appearance here. tru1cy and Qantaga haven't been around that I've noticed.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 11:08 am
by Scoop20906
This has been a rough stretch but now that the holidays are over we can get people posting again.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 11:33 am
by Moliere
RMC -> Remus West, bb2112, Remus West, J.D.
theohall -> triggercut, Remus West
bb2112 -> triggercut, Remus West
triggercut -> bb2112, qantaga, Remus West, J.D.
Scoop20906 -> RMC, Remus West, J.D.
Vorret -> bb2112, J.D.
Chaosraven -> qantaga, RMC, J.D.
El Guapo -> RMC, bb2112, RMC, J.D.
Remus West -> Qantaga, J.D.
Qantaga ->
tru1cy ->
J.D. ->
Remus West (2): bb2112, theohall
J.D. (7): RMC, Vorret, Chaosraven, triggercut, Scoop20906, El Guapo, Remus West
A trial was held in absentia. A verdict reached. A sentence passed. J.D. was found guilty of treason. After a nationwide manhunt J.D. turned up drunk in a D.C. motel surrounded by empty bottles of alcohol and one dead hooker. After being sobered up J.D. was informed of the charges put against the wall and shot. No black blood of Democrat appeared. J.D. was a true red blooded American.
Specials send in your night orders.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 11:34 am
by El Guapo
Not surprising. Well at least the dead weight is gone.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 11:44 am
by Vorret
Damn so we lost JD and Scoop?
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 11:48 am
by Scoop20906
HEY!
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 11:48 am
by Remus West
Vorret wrote:Damn so we lost JD and Scoop?
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 12:58 pm
by bb2112
Vorret wrote:Damn so we lost JD and Scoop?
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 12:58 pm
by Remus West
bb2112
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:08 pm
by RMC
Remus West wrote: bb2112
I do have to say BB stayed off the JD vote... Not that it really sheds any light either way..
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:45 pm
by El Guapo
Remus West wrote: bb2112
No no, now you post that in the other forum.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:51 pm
by Vorret
El Guapo wrote:Remus West wrote: bb2112
No no, now you post that in the other forum.
It's indeed weird that he posted that at night.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 3:41 pm
by Remus West
Heh. You guys are slow. I was simply testing to see if he was going to post everything I posted since he posted the exact same response to vorret's comment.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 3:50 pm
by Vorret
You played us!
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 10:21 pm
by bb2112
Remus West wrote:Heh. You guys are slow. I was simply testing to see if he was going to post everything I posted since he posted the exact same response to vorret's comment.
I'm just glad I wasn't drinking milk when I read it.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 10:31 pm
by Chaosraven
we kill el guapo.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 10:43 pm
by El Guapo
Chaosraven wrote:we kill el guapo.
Pffff. Good luck, as I self-protec...uhhhh I mean, you know, whatever.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 11:19 pm
by bb2112
Chaosraven wrote:we kill el guapo.
Wrong forum.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:02 am
by Chaosraven
Chaosraven wrote:bb2112 wrote:we kill el guapo.
Wrong forum.
Yep
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:36 am
by El Guapo
bb2112 wrote:Chaosraven wrote:we kill el guapo.
Wrong forum.
Uh oh Chaosraven, he totally busted you! That would have slipped by the rest of us, but now we have you.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 6:50 am
by bb2112
El Guapo wrote:bb2112 wrote:Chaosraven wrote:we kill el guapo.
Wrong forum.
Uh oh Chaosraven, he totally busted you! That would have slipped by the rest of us, but now we have you.
Good one. That was almost funny.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 10:39 am
by Remus West
bb2112 wrote:El Guapo wrote:bb2112 wrote:Chaosraven wrote:we kill el guapo.
Wrong forum.
Uh oh Chaosraven, he totally busted you! That would have slipped by the rest of us, but now we have you.
Good one. That was almost funny.
You have time to post here but not begin the epic fight that will lead to one of our deaths in the Titan game? For shame.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 10:53 am
by Vorret
The what ?
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 10:57 am
by Remus West
Vorret wrote:The what ?
Titan game. We are playing a 5 player online game with CR, redrun, LM, bb2112, and myself. I should really throw it open to get people from here that might be interested to play as well next game. I have attacked his Titan stack with my own which means one of us will be eliminated. Hopefully and likely him.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:06 am
by Vorret
Looks complicated!
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:29 am
by Remus West
Vorret wrote:Looks complicated!
It isn't. It would be difficult to explain online I think. The basic idea is that everyone begins in a tower and moves around the game board based on a six sided die and the movement restrictions on the board. You must move at least one of your legions each turn but do not have to move more than one. When you move you have the ability to muster new units to join your legion based upon where you land and what you already have. Each legion can consist of up to 7 units and may split at any time as long as each legion they split into contains at least 2 units. As your legions move and encounter opposing legions you use the units to fight on a battle board. If you lose your Titan unit you are eliminated.
As for what I was referring to, I have attacks bb2112's legion containing his Titan with my own. Thus one of our Titans will be killed and we will be eliminated.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:40 am
by El Guapo
I'm pretty much on board for any online board game.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:23 pm
by RMC
Remus West wrote:Vorret wrote:The what ?
Titan game. We are playing a 5 player online game with CR, redrun, LM, bb2112, and myself. I should really throw it open to get people from here that might be interested to play as well next game. I have attacked his Titan stack with my own which means one of us will be eliminated. Hopefully and likely him.
Egads! That's a 100.00+ board game. Can you get it for a better price? Looks interesting, and something my group might enjoy.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:26 pm
by Remus West
I didn't even look at the price from that site. I have no idea what it runs these days. I bought my first copy for $20 in the mid 80s then when it came back into print bought the "new" version for 70 something iirc. I'd think you could beat 100 bucks but haven't looked in a long time.
Word of warning - it can be a long game. If you are playing a game with more than 2 people (it works very well 2 player imo) and someone gets eliminated early they may find themselves sitting around for several hours while the game finishes. I actually prefer playing it live as a 2 player just for this reason. If you play with more than 3 then the eliminated players can play something else while they wait but it is not an easy game to gauge time requirements for due to the need to track down the opposing Titans. If they are lucky in running around the game board it can take a long time even if you have them overwhelmed in power.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 1:09 pm
by RMC
Remus West wrote:I didn't even look at the price from that site. I have no idea what it runs these days. I bought my first copy for $20 in the mid 80s then when it came back into print bought the "new" version for 70 something iirc. I'd think you could beat 100 bucks but haven't looked in a long time.
Word of warning - it can be a long game. If you are playing a game with more than 2 people (it works very well 2 player imo) and someone gets eliminated early they may find themselves sitting around for several hours while the game finishes. I actually prefer playing it live as a 2 player just for this reason. If you play with more than 3 then the eliminated players can play something else while they wait but it is not an easy game to gauge time requirements for due to the need to track down the opposing Titans. If they are lucky in running around the game board it can take a long time even if you have them overwhelmed in power.
Cool. Thanks, I'll look at the usual suspects and forums.
Thanks for the information.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:00 pm
by Moliere
Following the death of J.D. the committee adjourns for the night. During the after-party a scuffle is heard in the hallway. The investigation shows a cut rope as if the Democrats were interrupted in their attempt to take out a Republican.
It is now Day 3. Six votes are required for the next treason trial.
RMC ->
theohall ->
bb2112 ->
triggercut ->
Scoop20906 ->
Vorret ->
Chaosraven ->
El Guapo ->
Remus West ->
Qantaga ->
tru1cy ->
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:02 pm
by Scoop20906
FINALLY!! Feels like years since we had some luck.
Good job!
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:02 pm
by Scoop20906
Teddy!
Teddy!
Teddy!
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:03 pm
by Remus West
El Guapo wrote:Chaosraven wrote:we kill el guapo.
Pffff. Good luck, as I self-protec...uhhhh I mean, you know, whatever.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:15 pm
by Vorret
Would be quite epic if ElG was actually a Teddy.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:35 pm
by Remus West
Vorret wrote:Would be quite epic if ElG was actually a Teddy.
Be much more fun if he is a normal and was protected anyway.