Octopus Overlords

Zaxxon wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 3:58 pm

Kraken wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 3:56 pm He doesn't suddenly become credible because he's saying what we want to hear. We already know he's an unreliable narrator.

Indeed. But the receipts sure help.

Kraken wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 3:56 pm He doesn't suddenly become credible because he's saying what we want to hear. We already know he's an unreliable narrator.

GreenGoo wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 4:58 pm

Kraken wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 3:56 pm He doesn't suddenly become credible because he's saying what we want to hear. We already know he's an unreliable narrator.

He's reliable because he's saying what we already knew, not what we wanted to know.

Here’s the biggest takeaway from this morning’s hearing: Not a single Republican asked about the many troubling allegations about our president put forward by his former personal attorney. Instead, it was all attack, distract and deflect. Which they learned from the president.

Cohen said the Southern District of New York is looking at “other” illegal acts by President Trump that haven’t been raised yet, but that he was asked him not to get into it publicly

Jaymann wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 5:12 pm Does Vietnam have an extradition treaty with the US?

Isgrimnur wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 5:15 pm

Jaymann wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 5:12 pm Does Vietnam have an extradition treaty with the US?

Nope.

El Guapo wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 1:48 pm

Kraken wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 3:56 pm He doesn't suddenly become credible because he's saying what we want to hear. We already know he's an unreliable narrator.

Pyperkub wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 5:21 pm

Isgrimnur wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 5:15 pm

Jaymann wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 5:12 pm Does Vietnam have an extradition treaty with the US?

Nope.

How about a Trump property? Or is it one of his shithole countries?

The contact with Vietnam was not set up by the State Department. Instead, Trump’s personal lawyer, Marc Kasowitz, helped arrange the call.

Kasowitz had another client with a keen interest in Vietnam: Philip Falcone, an American investor with a major casino outside Ho Chi Minh City. After the Trump call, Kasowitz traveled to Vietnam with Falcone. They met with government officials as part of an effort to persuade Vietnam to lift a ban on gambling for its citizens. Such a shift would deliver vastly more gamblers to Falcone’s casino.
...
Kasowitz has represented Trump for over 15 years, including in the Trump University fraud case, against allegations of sexual harassment, and, most recently, in the Russia investigation.

Falcone, who was barred from the securities industry several years ago after admitting to wrongdoing in managing his hedge fund, has been trying for several years to salvage his several hundred-million-dollar bet on Vietnam’s gaming industry. So far, that investment has not paid off, in large measure because of the rules limiting casinos to foreign bettors.

GreenGoo wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 4:58 pm There'd be some holdouts I'm sure, but the majority would flee the sinking ship, not because they're disloyal, but because the fucking ship is broken wide open and is sinking.

LordMortis wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 5:31 pm

GreenGoo wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 4:58 pm There'd be some holdouts I'm sure, but the majority would flee the sinking ship, not because they're disloyal, but because the fucking ship is broken wide open and is sinking.

All of these open secrets and the ship isn't sinking.

Pyperkub wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 5:21 pm

Isgrimnur wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 5:15 pm

Jaymann wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 5:12 pm Does Vietnam have an extradition treaty with the US?

Nope.

How about a Trump property? Or is it one of his shithole countries?

Pyperkub wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 5:27 pm

Kraken wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 3:56 pm He doesn't suddenly become credible because he's saying what we want to hear. We already know he's an unreliable narrator.

In addition to the other points, it has also been alleged that some of that "unreliable" narration may have been written by Trump's lawyer, Jay Sekulow in Cohen (and others?) testimony/statements to Congress.

El Guapo wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 6:17 pm

Pyperkub wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 5:27 pm

Kraken wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 3:56 pm He doesn't suddenly become credible because he's saying what we want to hear. We already know he's an unreliable narrator.

In addition to the other points, it has also been alleged that some of that "unreliable" narration may have been written by Trump's lawyer, Jay Sekulow in Cohen (and others?) testimony/statements to Congress.

That's suborning perjury, right? Seems like a crime on its face, if true. Though that supposes that they know it's false when making the edits.

Cohen asked for copy of audit behind Trump's claim he couldn't release tax returns. Never got it.

Didn't want tax experts to rip apart his tax returns bc he'd get audited.

Gomez points out that suggests he wasn't being audited. Cohen agrees.
GOmez: THey keep beating you up for tax fraud, but they won't ask Trump for his tax returns.
Gomez asks if Trump hires people who will lie and cheat for them.

Cohen: From facts and circumstances the answer is yes...

...
AOC: Did POTUS present inflated assets to insurance?

Cohen: Yes, names who to get the docs from.
Cohen names two other properties where Trump cheated on taxes.
Cohen doesn't know abt NYT allegations on 1990s tax fraud. Says Weisselberg would.
Trump tasked Cohen to find the straw bidder to ensure his painting went for the highest amount on the day.

YellowKing wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 8:07 pm My only consolation is that somehow, someday, the truth will come out. And every one of these GOP ass-kissing toadies will be exposed as the corrupt, fraudulent bunch of shit-weasels they are.

“The interesting thing is that there hasn’t been one Republican yet who has tried to defend the president on the substance, and I think that’s something that should be concerning to the White House,” Christie noted.

Asking “why are no Republicans standing up and defending the president on the substance” in the hearing, the former Trump transition-team chief added that this is “either a failure of those Republicans on the Hill or a failure of the White House to have a unified strategy with them.”

Christie concluded that they had to know this was coming with Cohen, so it will be a tired line of attack going after Cohen as the hearing continues.

“He’s not a credible witness, but he does have corroboration on certain things,” he asserted, asking once again: “Where is the defense of the president?”

YellowKing wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 8:07 pm My only consolation is that somehow, someday, the truth will come out. And every one of these GOP ass-kissing toadies will be exposed as the corrupt, fraudulent bunch of shit-weasels they are.

Pyperkub wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 8:16 pm

YellowKing wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 8:07 pm My only consolation is that somehow, someday, the truth will come out. And every one of these GOP ass-kissing toadies will be exposed as the corrupt, fraudulent bunch of shit-weasels they are.

It is coming out, slowly. Here's the take of one of those ass-kissing toadies:

“The interesting thing is that there hasn’t been one Republican yet who has tried to defend the president on the substance, and I think that’s something that should be concerning to the White House,” Christie noted.

Asking “why are no Republicans standing up and defending the president on the substance” in the hearing, the former Trump transition-team chief added that this is “either a failure of those Republicans on the Hill or a failure of the White House to have a unified strategy with them.”

Christie concluded that they had to know this was coming with Cohen, so it will be a tired line of attack going after Cohen as the hearing continues.

“He’s not a credible witness, but he does have corroboration on certain things,” he asserted, asking once again: “Where is the defense of the president?”

Where indeed?

The fact of the matter is that this is the only refuge of a party which has sold its soul for power and is morally bankrupt.

Two of President Donald Trump's closest allies on the House Judiciary Committee referred Trump's former personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, to the Justice Department Thursday for possible criminal prosecution, claiming to have evidence that Cohen "committed perjury and knowingly made false statements" to lawmakers during his day-long testimony Wednesday.

The criminal referral -- sent by Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, the top Republican on the Oversight Committee, and North Carolina Republican Rep. Mark Meadows -- outlined several areas of testimony they urged the Justice Department to investigate, including Cohen's claims Wednesday that he did not seek a job in the Trump White House, his denial of committing bank fraud, as well as his assertion that the did not have any reportable contracts with foreign entities.
...
"I was extremely proud to be the personal attorney for the President of the United States of America," Cohen told lawmakers Wednesday. "I did not want to go to the White House."

Yet Republicans have pointed to court filings from prosecutors in the Southern District of New York that stated Cohen "privately told friends and colleagues, including in seized text messages, that he expected to be given a prominent role and title in the new administration" -- an assertion Cohen said Wednesday was "not inaccurate."

"Mr. Cohen's testimony is material to the Committee's assessment of Mr. Cohen's motive to monetize his former association with President Trump," Jordan and Meadows wrote to the Justice Department on Thursday. "It is essential that the Department of Justice investigate these remarkable contradictions between Mr. Cohen, the SDNY prosecutors, and the public accounts of witnesses with firsthand information."
...
Jordan and Meadows also claim that Cohen's testimony that he "never defrauded any bank" was "intentionally false" given that Manhattan prosecutors "specifically referred to Mr. Cohen's crimes of making false statements to financial institutions as 'bank fraud'" in a footnote of his plea agreement.

Cohen pleaded guilty to making false statements to a financial institution, however, not bank fraud, and prosecutors have not alleged that any bank lost money.

The GOP lawmakers additionally accused Cohen of lying about his contacts with foreign entities, a point highlighted by Meadows at Wednesday's hearing. Cohen said he would review the form and amend it if necessary.

El Guapo wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 3:35 pm No doubt Meadows and Jordan are deeply concerned about the truth here.

El Guapo wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 3:35 pm No doubt Meadows and Jordan are deeply concerned about the truth here.

Moliere wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2019 12:52 am
Boom!

GungHo wrote:
Since Cohen was talking about that alleged(I'd hate to say anything bad about this president that wasn't true) tax fraud, does that mean the SDNY has already investigated it? Or is it possible they didn't already know about this (surely not...)?
Be pretty awesome if what took trump down was his getting elected...actually that would still suck but at least we'd get a little schadenfrude.

Blackhawk wrote:Wait, somebody asked some relevant questions? I thought they were just going to take turns making speeches. At least that's what I took away from the portion I was able to watch.

Pyperkub wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2019 10:39 am

Blackhawk wrote:Wait, somebody asked some relevant questions? I thought they were just going to take turns making speeches. At least that's what I took away from the portion I was able to watch.

The dems and Amash actually asked relevant questions.

hepcat wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2019 10:45 am

Pyperkub wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2019 10:39 am

Blackhawk wrote:Wait, somebody asked some relevant questions? I thought they were just going to take turns making speeches. At least that's what I took away from the portion I was able to watch.

The dems and Amash actually asked relevant questions.

I read that initially as "The dems and Amish", which then lead me down a path of envisioning a group of people in a buggy asking Cohen if Trump purposely inflated the value of any barns he helped raise.

hepcat wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2019 10:45 am

Pyperkub wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2019 10:39 am

Blackhawk wrote:Wait, somebody asked some relevant questions? I thought they were just going to take turns making speeches. At least that's what I took away from the portion I was able to watch.

The dems and Amash actually asked relevant questions.

I read that initially as "The dems and Amish", which then lead me down a path of envisioning a group of people in a buggy asking Cohen if Trump purposely inflated the value of any barns he helped raise.

Ben Walters, Amish PAC co-founder, said they knew Donald Trump, the president-elect, was going to win Ohio so the organization shifted its focus to Pennsylvania, where more than 500 volunteers helped register Amish and Mennonite voters and drive them to the polls on Election Day.

...

He said Pennsylvania is the state that put Trump over the 270 electoral college votes needed to win the election.

“Trump won by just a razor thin margin across Pennsylvania,” said Walters, who said the Amish votes helped and that he doesn’t think Trump would have won Pennsylvania “if it hadn’t been for the Amish vote.”

“Trump’s margin of victory in Pennsylvania was identical to the Amish population of Pennsylvania. Again, I’m not claiming every single Amish person voted, but without the votes of those who went to the polls that day…a recount would have been likely,” Walters said.