data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee585/ee5855d36dc82b31dffcfce42cfd3f60d8e372f0" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f89/52f89850506295c89aa8d34526eb25c69f327feb" alt="Clap :clap:"
Moderators: $iljanus, LawBeefaroni
Not that the entire quote isn't on the crazy train, but how on earth is the CDC making money from advocating that you minimize the risk of giving Nana covid?Skinypupy wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 5:52 pm
"What?? Total BS. And that’s the CDC that is making money from all of this $hit!!"
RunningMn9 wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 6:34 pm SP. you need better friends if you have some that think that the CDC is a profit center, making money off of this pandemic. Good lord.
Awesome.El Guapo wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 6:03 pm Look, he tried to reason with us, explain what we should do. But we didn't listen. So Smoove and his friends did what they needed to do.
Christ, these people are assholes.Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin will put $455 billion in unspent Cares Act funding into an account that his presumed successor, former Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen, will need authorization from Congress to use.
Mnuchin plans to place the money into the agency’s General Fund, a Treasury Department spokesperson said Tuesday. Moving the funds, the bulk of which had gone to support Federal Reserve emergency-lending facilities, will make it virtually impossible for Yellen, if confirmed by the Senate as Treasury secretary, to deploy on her own.
President-elect Joe Biden’s transition team last week called Mnuchin’s demand for the return of funds from the Fed “deeply irresponsible,” and congressional Democrats also panned the move. Mnuchin has denied that he was attempting to limit Biden’s options for reviving the economy.
Remember this the next time someone tells you that it's no big deal. We have no idea what the chronic impacts of this virus are.“We’re talking about people who were functioning normally (prior to contracting coronavirus), but now they’re not able to function the way they used to,” she says. “There can be neurocognitive impairment. There can be neurobehavioral impairment, or emotional impairment.”
The trend is being seen not just here in New Jersey, but at memory centers around the country and globally. The journal Neurology Today is reporting hundreds of COVID-19 “long-haulers” being treated for cognitive problems at specialty clinics set up in areas hardest hit by the virus.
Experts say it will take years of study to understand how coronavirus affects cognition and how severe or long-lasting the impact might be. But this much we already know: coronavirus is bad for the brain in ways that become immediately apparent in many people who have it.
While researchers try to determine what the long-term impact of coronavirus may be on the brain, the short-term impacts are already well-documented.
Coronavirus patients who are hospitalized exhibit a range of cognitive problems, including headaches, dizziness and brain fog.
In fact, four out of every five patients who end up in the hospital with COVID-19 experienced neurological problems during their illness, based on research done at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is finalizing guidance to shorten the length of time it recommends that people self-quarantine after potential exposure to the coronavirus to encourage more people to comply, two agency officials said Tuesday.
The new guidelines would probably be seven to 10 days instead of the current 14 days, the officials said.
The hope is that doing so will “help make quarantine less burdensome and will, as a result, hopefully increase compliance,” said one official, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.
As I saw recently, we need to retire the phrase 'avoid X like the plague.' It turns out that people don't do that...Daehawk wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 9:34 pm Shoot anyone who refuses quarantine. After two weeks everyone complies or everyone is dead.Im joking...no one would quarantine even then.
Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee said Tuesday that COVID-19 vaccines will be optional in the state's K-12 public schools, once they become available.
The Republican said at a news conference that vaccines will be very important for Tennessee to “ultimately really be able to handle” the virus. But he said he doesn't foresee COVID-19 mandates for school districts in Tennessee.
“Vaccines are a choice and people have the choice and will have the choice in this state as to whether or not they should take that vaccine,” Lee said. “That will be our strategy and that is what we think will happen all across the state.”
Sounds more like you're the miners in the elevator. If you start choking the canaries are already dead.YellowKing wrote: Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:33 am
I look at our markers as one of the canaries in the coal mine. If our numbers look scary, then I know the rest of the state is in deep trouble.
I know it was mentioned earlier that airlines and concerts might also be putting pressure on vaccination, which will help. I do think this is going to be the biggest hurdle in 2021 once we get the systems in place to mass-vaccinate. I've heard rumblings of paying people to vaccinate, but how can we expect people to compromise their deeply held religious beliefs and accept a cash payout of ~$1500 to get vaccinated?The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration has stated that employers can legally impose a flu vaccine requirement on their workforce, but employees have the right to request medical or religious exemptions under federal anti-discrimination laws. Each claim must be evaluated on its own merits, a time-consuming process for employers.
While it may be legal for employers to compel their workers to get the COVID-19 vaccine, doing so would be a huge, difficult undertaking, says Y. Tony Yang, executive director of the Center for Health Policy and Media Engagement at George Washington University, who has argued against COVID-19 vaccine mandates.
Blackhawk wrote: Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:43 am Indiana actually made a good showing early on, being an early lockdown and putting out good guidance and regulations. Then the governor felt a great disturbance in his reelection, as if 6.7 million redneck voices suddenly cried out in derpitude. Since then we've been a poster child for what not to do. We eased all of the restrictions early, went back to fully open when we were still rising, and now he's refusing to make the vaccination mandatory for schools.
And the rage builds as our leader negligently kills us by the thousands, while the uneducated hordes cheer him on and guarantee that he'll stay in power.
I know I've said it before, but I want out. I'd do anything* to get out.
*Anything that wouldn't negatively impact my family, which includes one kid still in school for another year and a half, and a mother-in-law who is elderly and relies on our support.
I don't know if I'd mandate a vaccine, especially this early in the process. While I wait impatiently for my turn, I also won't be first in line, even if they hold my place as high risk. I honestly don't trust how we got here, even as I lock myself away, try to WFH whenever I can, and long for a day of gaming with a friend or five in the same room, eating together, and rambling on or focusing like we're getting paid. My goodness, I want some of my coworkers and relatives to find the means to take this seriously but a mandate seems strong, even as we pass a quarter million dead.Smoove_B wrote: Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:41 pm Also, as I mentioned earlier - employers are weighing their options:
I know it was mentioned earlier that airlines and concerts might also be putting pressure on vaccination, which will help. I do think this is going to be the biggest hurdle in 2021 once we get the systems in place to mass-vaccinate. I've heard rumblings of paying people to vaccinate, but how can we expect people to compromise their deeply held religious beliefs and accept a cash payout of ~$1500 to get vaccinated?The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration has stated that employers can legally impose a flu vaccine requirement on their workforce, but employees have the right to request medical or religious exemptions under federal anti-discrimination laws. Each claim must be evaluated on its own merits, a time-consuming process for employers.
While it may be legal for employers to compel their workers to get the COVID-19 vaccine, doing so would be a huge, difficult undertaking, says Y. Tony Yang, executive director of the Center for Health Policy and Media Engagement at George Washington University, who has argued against COVID-19 vaccine mandates.![]()
Here's the thing, we've been living under America First bullshit since 2016, and during a pandemic it's not going to work. As a nation, we need to proactively squash the virus as part of a collaborative effort with other nations around the world. Unless the US can demonstrate a commitment to reducing circulating virus and minimizing outbreak risk, I fear it's going to have a continued impact on how we interface with the world - trade and travel in particular.LordMortis wrote: Wed Nov 25, 2020 1:19 pmI don't know if I'd mandate a vaccine, especially this early in the process. While I wait impatiently for my turn, I also won't be first in line, even if they hold my place as high risk. I honestly don't trust how we got here, even as I lock myself away, try to WFH whenever I can, and long for a day of gaming with a friend or five in the same room, eating together, and rambling on or focusing like we're getting paid. My goodness, I want some of my coworkers and relatives to find the means to take this seriously but a mandate seems strong, even as we pass a quarter million dead.
I suspect Americans will continue to be dolts and not follow guidelines and / or get shots to the point where other countries will ban us from traveling there and such again. They can all laugh and point at us.I suspect we're going to start off with the vaccination carrot but if there are too many people skipping out and we're not hitting target levels, out comes the stick. Once again, relying on people to do the right thing is likely going to bite us in the ass. But maybe I'm wrong. Maybe this *one time* Americans will step up and do the right thing.
Canada is level 3 (of 4 where travel would be wholly shut down) Travel Advisory due to COVID concerns. Non essential travel is not allowed. This isn't by Canadian region. It's Canada.Daehawk wrote: Wed Nov 25, 2020 2:02 pm I suspect Americans will continue to be dolts and not follow guidelines and / or get shots to the point where other countries will ban us from traveling there and such again. They can all laugh and point at us.
It's probably unrealistic to expect getting one in the next year anyway.Daehawk wrote: Wed Nov 25, 2020 2:02 pm Then again I have no intention of taking one of these first vaccines. Im not political I just dont trust the rush and Trumps pushing. Ill give it a year perhaps.
Jeff V wrote: Wed Nov 25, 2020 2:39 pmIt's probably unrealistic to expect getting one in the next year anyway.Daehawk wrote: Wed Nov 25, 2020 2:02 pm Then again I have no intention of taking one of these first vaccines. Im not political I just dont trust the rush and Trumps pushing. Ill give it a year perhaps.
It's going to come down to your state's ability to roll out vaccines. If your local public health system is robust, that's good. If it's non-existent, trouble.Jeff V wrote: Wed Nov 25, 2020 2:39 pmIt's probably unrealistic to expect getting one in the next year anyway.
I assume that factors in that we'll likely have an extreme turn around on the levels of competence coordinating the response, right? Instead of the corrosive and destructive 'Let Chaos Reign' approach that Trump took there will be highly qualified people actually doing the planning and interfacing between CDC, suppliers, FEMA, and the States. They'll have a steep climb at the beginning but the State will ultimately be the bottleneck for distribution as I understand it.Smoove_B wrote: Wed Nov 25, 2020 2:45 pmIt's going to come down to your state's ability to roll out vaccines. If your local public health system is robust, that's good. If it's non-existent, trouble.Jeff V wrote: Wed Nov 25, 2020 2:39 pmIt's probably unrealistic to expect getting one in the next year anyway.
For the same reasons we need to be firing on all cylinders because it's a pandemic, the U.S. really needs to make sure all states are being vaccinated in a way that makes sense as well. The article I'd posted earlier this week had specific concerns about rural America and I think they're valid. But based on what my state's plans are, I'd be amazed to learn other states aren't being told to be ready for the same (having 70% of adults vaccinated by 7/1).
Almost all of them and it's been brutal on me.
This is the echo I've been reading and and hearing since the Moderna press release.U.S. public health officials said vaccines will be generally available to most Americans in pharmacies, clinics and doctors offices starting in April so that anyone who wants a shot can have one by the end of June.
All correct yes. But in the end it should be the states struggling because of state-level issues, not because they're being actively starved of aid from the feds. It won't surprise me if somehow FEMA is activated to assist in vaccine delivery efforts for states that are woefully under-prepared for emergency response (Alaska and Arkansas, for example).malchior wrote: Wed Nov 25, 2020 2:53 pmThey'll have a steep climb at the beginning but the State will ultimately be the bottleneck for distribution as I understand it.
Pork roll Taylor Ham
Handshake
Wearing. A. Friggin’. Mask.
CDC/HHS aren't giving dates but they do have distribution plansJeff V wrote: Wed Nov 25, 2020 3:02 pm The time lines I've heard are along the lines of nursing home residents first couple of months, healthcare workers next couple of months, at-risk general population (old or infirm) probably through the end of the year and the rest of us in 2022. And that was a month ago when the timeline was presumed to begin 12/1. I'm certain the lame duck administration will do nothing in the next 2 months that facilitates a mass-vaccination campaign, but is more likely to make it difficult for any progress to be made.
Someone was on TV yesterday talking about extenuating circumstances. First, the virus has to be kept extremely cold, colder than most health care facilities can manage. Second, the recent survey suggests only 66% of the population is inclined to get vaccinated. Third -- nasty side effects that mimic actually having the virus, leaving one feeling shitty for days and the likelihood many aren't going to come back for the second dose because of it. What I didn't hear is what percentage of people experienced these side effects -- it could really slow down rollout to healthcare workers if it incapacitates 10 or 20% of them.