Page 25 of 27
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:17 pm
by theohall
Just to be clear, Scoop. I don't really care. Feel free to waste your time grounding me.
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Someone's missing!
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:19 pm
by Isgrimnur
Chaosraven (0): Lassr, theohall, Unagi, msteelers, Unagi
theohall (2): Scoop20906, msteelers, Unagi
Grundbegriff (1): Remus West, Unagi, theohall
Unagi (0): Grundbegriff
Majority is five
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:25 pm
by Chaosraven
Remus West wrote:Chaosraven wrote:In which case, I believe Unagi or Msteelers is the better choice today.
One of the things I did notice rereading was that msteelers placed his vote on Lagom at a time when I was the largest train and msteelers vote brought it into a tie. He could easily have placed a vote on me or anyone else without creating the difficulties for side Evil that Lagom's growing train presented.
Also, if Lewis has not scanned anyone from that subgroup then why would we not go after one of that subgroup and thus make it smaller?
uh ,dude? Both of them ARE members of that subgroup.
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:30 pm
by Remus West
Oh.
That'll teach me not to keep full track of who you find suspicious versus who I do.
I would rather ground Grund.
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:08 pm
by Unagi
Scoop20906 wrote:theohall wrote:Chaosraven needs to be moved. CR could be spoofing Uncle Art.
I could be spoofing Wilbur also. We both claimed roles have in no way been proven.
Well not really at all.
First (and mostly), you claimed a role while no one was dead. The fact that no one countered your claim is meaningful. The fact that no one countered Chaos' claim is much less so.
Your role also
Did Something (protected Remus) and you announced that. It is something the Remus has, in effect, confirmed...
He was protected. (of course, evil knew he was protected too, but that still leaves us with the last evil person not wanting to fake the role of a living player)
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:36 pm
by Grundbegriff
Scoop20906 wrote:Ok, I guess we are still waiting on Grund to comment on if he is Lewis and made the scans right? Everyone else has checked in.
I'm here. I'm not Lewis.
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:44 pm
by Scoop20906
Ok. Let's vote. I can vote for Theohall, msteelers or Grund in order is suspicion.
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:45 pm
by Scoop20906
Unagi wrote:Scoop20906 wrote:theohall wrote:Chaosraven needs to be moved. CR could be spoofing Uncle Art.
I could be spoofing Wilbur also. We both claimed roles have in no way been proven.
Well not really at all.
First (and mostly), you claimed a role while no one was dead. The fact that no one countered your claim is meaningful. The fact that no one countered Chaos' claim is much less so.
Your role also
Did Something (protected Remus) and you announced that. It is something the Remus has, in effect, confirmed...
He was protected. (of course, evil knew he was protected too, but that still leaves us with the last evil person not wanting to fake the role of a living player)
Just explaining to Theohall how I categoried things.
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 8:53 pm
by theohall
Scoop20906 wrote:Unagi wrote:Scoop20906 wrote:theohall wrote:Chaosraven needs to be moved. CR could be spoofing Uncle Art.
I could be spoofing Wilbur also. We both claimed roles have in no way been proven.
Well not really at all.
First (and mostly), you claimed a role while no one was dead. The fact that no one countered your claim is meaningful. The fact that no one countered Chaos' claim is much less so.
Your role also
Did Something (protected Remus) and you announced that. It is something the Remus has, in effect, confirmed...
He was protected. (of course, evil knew he was protected too, but that still leaves us with the last evil person not wanting to fake the role of a living player)
Just explaining to Theohall how I categoried things.
Which makes absolutely no sense - as Unagi pointed out. But then again, good Scoop never makes sense.
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 10:41 pm
by Unagi
theohall
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:53 am
by Remus West
Just a point, but I never confirmed I was attacked. I have no way of knowing aside from the fact that Scoop says I was and that I remain here without anyone having died to make Scoop's role claim a possible lie.
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 1:08 am
by Scoop20906
Remus West wrote:Just a point, but I never confirmed I was attacked. I have no way of knowing aside from the fact that Scoop says I was and that I remain here without anyone having died to make Scoop's role claim a possible lie.
That was pretty much what I was saying.
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 3:39 am
by Remus West
Unagi wrote:It is something the Remus has, in effect, confirmed... He was protected. (of course, evil knew he was protected too, but that still leaves us with the last evil person not wanting to fake the role of a living player)
This is what I was responding to, Scoop. I haven't confirmed or denied anything. I'm not in position to know what happened. I think that is what Unagi meant with the "in effect" but I wanted it to be clear. I think I muddied it though.

Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:08 am
by Grundbegriff
Remus West wrote:Unagi wrote:It is something the Remus has, in effect, confirmed... He was protected. (of course, evil knew he was protected too, but that still leaves us with the last evil person not wanting to fake the role of a living player)
This is what I was responding to, Scoop. I haven't confirmed or denied anything. I'm not in position to know what happened. I think that is what Unagi meant with the "in effect" but I wanted it to be clear. I think I muddied it though.

Yeah-- Remus hasn't (in effect or otherwise) confirmed anything. The Scoop-Remus Nexus™ hinges on exactly one fact: that Scoop went uncontested in his claim to be Wilbur
while everyone was alive.
I'm ok with testing
theohall
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:20 am
by Unagi
Remus West wrote:Just a point, but I never confirmed I was attacked. I have no way of knowing aside from the fact that Scoop says I was and that I remain here without anyone having died to make Scoop's role claim a possible lie.
What!?
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:25 am
by Grundbegriff
Unagi wrote:Remus West wrote:Just a point, but I never confirmed I was attacked. I have no way of knowing aside from the fact that Scoop says I was and that I remain here without anyone having died to make Scoop's role claim a possible lie.
What!?
(a) Remus has no mechanism for knowing whether Evil attacked him
(b) Scoop claimed Wilbur while everyone was alive
(c) Nobody contested Scoop's claim
(d) Only if someone had died would it be possible for Scoop's role claim to be a lie. As someone alive, Remus is a co-contributor to the impossibility that Scoop is exploiting a death. [My paraphrase of that last bit].
Making sense now?
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:27 am
by Unagi
Like I said before, it's only a 'secondary point', (in that Scoop was uncontested, while everyone was around to contest) - however:
.... and never mind - I went to dig up the isgrimnur quote and I found it to be not what I thought....
Isgrimnur wrote:Grundbegriff wrote:BTW: Isgrimnur: Is Wilbur told if he successfully defended by night?
Yes, he is informed that he successfully defended his protection target.
I don't know why now, but at the time I could have sworn we asked if the target knew he was protected. I've just been running with the idea that Remus was told he was protected.
But, whatever - still: Scoop's claim <> Chaos' claim.
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:28 am
by Unagi
Grundbegriff wrote:Unagi wrote:Remus West wrote:Just a point, but I never confirmed I was attacked. I have no way of knowing aside from the fact that Scoop says I was and that I remain here without anyone having died to make Scoop's role claim a possible lie.
What!?
(a) Remus has no mechanism for knowing whether Evil attacked him
(b) Scoop claimed Wilbur while everyone was alive
(c) Nobody contested Scoop's claim
(d) Only if someone had died would it be possible for Scoop's role claim to be a lie. As someone alive, Remus is a co-contributor to the impossibility that Scoop is exploiting a death. [My paraphrase of that last bit].
Making sense now?
I've never had any issue with b,c,d - in fact those have been my points to scoop. I erred on (a) - but it's meaningless, since b,c,d cover everything
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:31 am
by Unagi
(Grund, you corrected me as I was correcting myself - in case there is some confusion)
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:39 am
by Lassr
Looks like we are ready to go and theohall is the target. I don't know what the vote count is so here's mine just in case it's needed.
theohall
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:41 pm
by Qantaga
Hmmm...
My head is spinning.
-Chaos is either Uncle Art or the remaining baddie (what a great play to try to get Lewis to reveal himself if Newcastle or stessier (unlikely since he had the chance to own up to being Uncle Art when I specifically asked him) were Uncel Art).
-Scoop and Remus are tied together, most likely Wilbur and successful protect.
-Lassr is most likely good.
-Lewis hasn't found the last bad guy yet.
It looks like Lassr's vote grounded theo, so here's hoping that seals the victory for us Robinsons. (Realizing that, strangely enough, just hoping for a Robinson victory apparently casts suspicion on me in this crowd

).
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 1:01 pm
by Scoop20906
Is there a scenario where the baddie chose not to kill someone and the claimed Wilbur and the real Wilbur kept quiet? I'm not saying it's likely but that is possible, right?
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Someone's missing!
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 2:53 pm
by Isgrimnur
Chaosraven (0): Lassr, theohall, Unagi, msteelers, Unagi
theohall (5): Scoop20906, msteelers, Unagi , Unagi, Grundbegriff, Lassr
Grundbegriff (1): Remus West, Unagi, theohall
Unagi (0): Grundbegriff
Voting is closed
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 2:58 pm
by Isgrimnur
After much deliberation and recrimination, it was found that theohall smelled a little too soapy. An empty bottle of soap was found with his belongings. theohall is sent outside with a mop and bucket while the party continues inside.
As the evening ends, everyone returns to their quarters, while theohall is sent off to join stessier in being grounded. Grateful to finally have some company, both of them stay up and talk through the night, commiserating in their boredom
theohall was a Robinson
It is the beginning of the night phase:
Lewis: Who will you scan?
Wilbur: Who will you protect?
Bowler Hat Guy: Who will you kidnap?
DOR-15: Who will you scan?
*any other players identified are for story purposes only and do not represent any game information.
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 3:34 pm
by theohall
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 5:13 pm
by Chaosraven
Qantaga wrote:Hmmm...
My head is spinning.
-Chaos is either Uncle Art or the remaining baddie (what a great play to try to get Lewis to reveal himself if Newcastle or stessier (unlikely since he had the chance to own up to being Uncle Art when I specifically asked him) were Uncel Art).
-Scoop and Remus are tied together, most likely Wilbur and successful protect.
-Lassr is most likely good.
-Lewis hasn't found the last bad guy yet.
It looks like Lassr's vote grounded theo, so here's hoping that seals the victory for us Robinsons. (Realizing that, strangely enough, just hoping for a Robinson victory apparently casts suspicion on me in this crowd

).
only your apparent need to state it in public. "oh guys I hope we WIN! Go Team NotEvil! WOOOOOOO!"

G'damned Cheerleader.
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:08 pm
by Qantaga
Chaosraven wrote:only your apparent need to state it in public. "oh guys I hope we WIN! Go Team NotEvil! WOOOOOOO!"

G'damned Cheerleader.
So, I shouldn't hope for a Robinson victory?
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Night 3: theohall grounde
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:12 pm
by Chaosraven
That wide-eyed innocent look is tainted by the sneer of sarcasm. Did you have a moment of panic when you realized there was no way to get your vote off your partner? Perhaps you hadn't checked in for a while and by then it was too late. A frenzy of PM with Lagom assuring you it would be alright.
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Night 3: theohall grounde
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:33 pm
by Qantaga
If you're really interested in finding the last bad guy (and you're not spoofing Uncle Art), you'll be able to go back early in the thread and see that I checked in plenty and had ample opportunity to pull my vote of Lagom.
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:07 pm
by Remus West
Isgrimnur wrote:theohall is sent off to join stessier
Ha ha, no cable for you.
I'm irritated by that vote.
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Night 3: theohall grounde
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 10:20 am
by Unagi
I wish he hadn't talked up how much he didn't care. That and his total lack of "Ohh noes, Unagi!" this game was what made me feel he was perhaps hiding in plain sight.
I know where I am voting tomorrow, should I survive the night.
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 10:51 am
by Scoop20906
Remus West wrote:Isgrimnur wrote:theohall is sent off to join stessier
Ha ha, no cable for you.
I'm irritated by that vote.
Hey, the final baddie is doing a great job, right now. You have to admit he hasn't given us a real clue to latch onto. Tonight should be interesting.
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 3: Newcastle is missi
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:43 pm
by Remus West
Scoop20906 wrote:You have to admit he hasn't given us a real clue to latch onto.
No. No, I do not.
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 4: Qantaga missing
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:40 pm
by Isgrimnur
As you rise in the morning, a pall has fallen over the family. You've had to ground two of your family for their ill-advised pranks and there's been no sign of Newcastle. As you descend to breakfast, you look around and count heads. It appears that Qantaga has not made an appearance yet. You head to check his room and see that the window is open and his footprints are seen in the lawn. But they appear to be an odd gait. You're filled with dread that something has happened and he did not leave of his own volition.
Heading for the garage, determined to find what's going on, you find that the cars have been left on empty. Someone didn't re-fill the tanks when they brought them back. As things are getting dicey around the Robinson compound and the cards are desperately needed, a grounding is in order.
It is Day 4. Vote for grounding. There are seven players remaining, majority is at four.
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 4: Qantaga missing
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 2:01 pm
by msteelers
Alright everyone, it's time to end this. I am Lewis and
Grund is DOR-15.
Grundbegriff
I scanned him last night, as my
list of players that I had no information on was reduced to two: Grund and Qantaga. Everyone else was either already scanned, had claimed a role, or were grounded. I scanned Remus the first night and Unagi the second night.
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 4: Qantaga missing
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 2:23 pm
by Unagi
Good, I was going to come in here 30 minutes ago with my vote on him - but didn't want to give away (yet again) that I may not be Lewis...
Anyhow - good job!
Grundbegriff
Yes, msteelers could be lying about being Lewis - but really?
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 4: Qantaga missing
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 2:25 pm
by Unagi
and good job, Grund, getting us to actually bark up a few trees before we barked up yours.
Anyhow - like I said. Lagom lit him up!

Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 4: Qantaga missing
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 2:30 pm
by Unagi
msteelers wrote:I scanned Remus the first night and Unagi the second night.
I think it's funny how one (myself) goes about in a game thinking certain people trust them (msteelers), when in fact they don't.

Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 4: Qantaga missing
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 2:32 pm
by Scoop20906
msteelers wrote:Alright everyone, it's time to end this. I am Lewis and
Grund is DOR-15.
Grundbegriff
I scanned him last night, as my
list of players that I had no information on was reduced to two: Grund and Qantaga. Everyone else was either already scanned, had claimed a role, or were grounded. I scanned Remus the first night and Unagi the second night.
NICE JOB!
Ok, before we rush to vote Grund lets give someone a chance to counter.
Re: "Meet the Robinsons" WW game - Day 2 : Party Hearty!
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 2:34 pm
by Scoop20906
Grundbegriff wrote:Grundbegriff wrote:Scoop20906 wrote:Yeah, thats why it was surprising Lagom didn't claim to be Stewart when he had the chance to try to force Stewart to reveal himself. Because killing stewart could trigger the end game round (Dusk I think), we would have to wait for the real Stewart to come forward before grounding Lagom. Luckily, that didn't happen.
Something to think about when considering grounding candidates today. Who amongst us would miss this and not advise his partner accordingly?
Astute
This again strikes me as interesting.
Very cute, Grund. I should always beware when you give me compliments.