Re: Syria - civil war incoming?
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2024 2:49 pm
Is the location of the ships actually unknown?
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
Satellite imagery show that Russian naval ships have left Moscow's base at Tartous on Syria's coast and some have dropped anchor offshore following the overthrow of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad by rebel forces.
An image taken on Dec. 9 by Planet Labs showed at least three vessels in Russia’s Mediterranean fleet, including two guided missile frigates and an oiler, moored around 13 km (eight miles) northwest of Tartous. The rest of the fleet could not be immediately located in satellite imagery.
I understand that they have a port there already, although it sounds like it's not nearly as advanced / built up as the existing facilities in Syria.Max Peck wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 4:42 pm I've seen some speculation that they might make for port in Tobruk if all else fails. Apparently the warlord that controls that part of Libya is on good terms with Russia.
They could presumably head out of the Med and up to St Peterburg, although the optics of regional retreat would be terrible for Putin.Max Peck wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 4:42 pm I've seen some speculation that they might make for port in Tobruk if all else fails. Apparently the warlord that controls that part of Libya is on good terms with Russia.
The chatter I've seen claims that they can't make it that far without any friendly ports to call on along the way.Holman wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 6:30 pmThey could presumably head out of the Med and up to St Peterburg, although the optics of regional retreat would be terrible for Putin.Max Peck wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 4:42 pm I've seen some speculation that they might make for port in Tobruk if all else fails. Apparently the warlord that controls that part of Libya is on good terms with Russia.
What the hell kind of major power ocean navy can't sail 5,000 nautical miles?Max Peck wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 6:34 pmThe chatter I've seen claims that they can't make it that far without any friendly ports to call on along the way.Holman wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 6:30 pmThey could presumably head out of the Med and up to St Peterburg, although the optics of regional retreat would be terrible for Putin.Max Peck wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 4:42 pm I've seen some speculation that they might make for port in Tobruk if all else fails. Apparently the warlord that controls that part of Libya is on good terms with Russia.
Ships have to refuel, the U.S. Arleigh Burke class destroyer has a range of 4,400 miles, and I think most of the Russian ships are smaller and have a much lower range. And there are not a lot of friendly ports between Syria and the Baltic. If they don’t have a tanker, they don’t have the fuel to get back to Russia.Holman wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 10:41 pmWhat the hell kind of major power ocean navy can't sail 5,000 nautical miles?Max Peck wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 6:34 pmThe chatter I've seen claims that they can't make it that far without any friendly ports to call on along the way.Holman wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 6:30 pmThey could presumably head out of the Med and up to St Peterburg, although the optics of regional retreat would be terrible for Putin.Max Peck wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 4:42 pm I've seen some speculation that they might make for port in Tobruk if all else fails. Apparently the warlord that controls that part of Libya is on good terms with Russia.
That's generally the point that was being made -- Russia's ability to project naval power has always been aspirational rather than real (aside from their nuclear submarine fleet, perhaps). Under normal circumstances, the bolt hole for the Med fleet would likely be Sevastopol, but Turkey won't grant them passage and even if they did, there's a non-zero chance that Ukraine would just start sinking the ships when they showed up in the Black Sea.Holman wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 10:41 pmWhat the hell kind of major power ocean navy can't sail 5,000 nautical miles?Max Peck wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 6:34 pmThe chatter I've seen claims that they can't make it that far without any friendly ports to call on along the way.Holman wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 6:30 pmThey could presumably head out of the Med and up to St Peterburg, although the optics of regional retreat would be terrible for Putin.Max Peck wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 4:42 pm I've seen some speculation that they might make for port in Tobruk if all else fails. Apparently the warlord that controls that part of Libya is on good terms with Russia.
I thought I'd read that they do have an oiler with them. In Western navies, every fleet does.Grifman wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 11:38 pmShips have to refuel, the U.S. Arleigh Burke class destroyer has a range of 4,400 miles, and I think most of the Russian ships are smaller and have a much lower range. And there are not a lot of friendly ports between Syria and the Baltic. If they don’t have a tanker, they don’t have the fuel to get back to Russia.Holman wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 10:41 pmWhat the hell kind of major power ocean navy can't sail 5,000 nautical miles?Max Peck wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 6:34 pmThe chatter I've seen claims that they can't make it that far without any friendly ports to call on along the way.Holman wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 6:30 pmThey could presumably head out of the Med and up to St Peterburg, although the optics of regional retreat would be terrible for Putin.Max Peck wrote: Tue Dec 10, 2024 4:42 pm I've seen some speculation that they might make for port in Tobruk if all else fails. Apparently the warlord that controls that part of Libya is on good terms with Russia.
Maybe they opened the door to let everyone out, and didn't stay to see that there was a guy who wasn't able to move left behind. Who knows.Victoria Raverna wrote: Wed Dec 11, 2024 11:08 pm The cell is big for a single person. So they released everyone that was in that room and left him alone in that cell?
This is part of and a result of the colonial government playbook, incidentally. Typically colonial powers would pick a minority group like this and give them a dominant role in the colonial government. That gives the colonial power one group in the country with a genuine commitment to continued colonial rule, as they would have to worry about ethnic retribution should the colonial government fall. Sometimes (as in Syria) the colonial elite would hold on to power after the colonial power left, but ultimately there's a clock on minority rule.hepcat wrote: Mon Dec 16, 2024 2:38 pm Sky News ran a piece on the fear of retribution against Assad's sect, the Alawites after his fall. Hopefully sectarian violence isn't going to be the end result of everything.
New update on that. apparently the guy was not a long time prisoner of Assad regime but a former Syrian intelligence officer who worked for Assad regime.hepcat wrote: Thu Dec 12, 2024 9:34 am He also may have been hiding, The people usually entering that cell without armed guards pushing them were probably not there for good reasons.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Tuesday that Israeli forces will stay in a buffer zone on the Syrian border, seized after the ouster of Syria’s President Bashar Assad, until another arrangement is in place “that ensures Israel’s security.”
Netanyahu made the comments from the summit of Mount Hermon — the highest peak in the area — inside Syria, about 10 kilometers (6 miles) from the border with the Israel-held Golan Heights.
It appeared to be the first time a sitting Israeli leader had set foot that far into Syria. Netanyahu said he had been on the same mountaintop 53 years ago as a soldier, but the summit’s importance to Israel’s security has only increased given recent events.
Israel seized a swath of southern Syria along the border with the Israeli-annexed Golan Heights days after Assad was ousted by rebels last week.
Israel’s capture of the buffer zone, a roughly 400-square-kilometer (155-square-mile) demilitarized area in Syrian territory, has sparked condemnation, with critics accusing Israel of violating a 1974 ceasefire and possibly exploiting the chaos in Syria in the wake of Assad’s ouster to make a land grab.
The US has scrapped a $10m (£7.9m) reward for the arrest of Syria's de facto leader Ahmed al-Sharaa, following meetings between senior diplomats and representatives from Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS).
Assistant Secretary of State Barbara Leaf said the discussion with Sharaa was "very productive", and he came across as "pragmatic".
The US delegation arrived in the capital, Damascus, after HTS overthrew the Bashar al-Assad regime less than a fortnight ago. Washington still designates it as a terrorist group.
A State Department spokesperson confirmed that the diplomats discussed "transition principles" supported by the US, regional events and the need to fight against IS.
Syria's new rebel-led authorities say supporters of ousted President Bashar al-Assad have killed 14 interior ministry troops in an "ambush" in the west of the country.
They say 10 other troops were wounded in the fighting on Tuesday near the Mediterranean port of Tartous, a stronghold of Assad's minority Alawite Muslim sect.
The clashes with pro-Assad loyalists are the first direct challenge to the authority of Syria's de facto leader Ahmad al-Sharaa.
Security forces launched an operation in Tartous province on Thursday, according to state news agency Sana, in a bid to "restore security, stability and civil peace".
Sana reported that the forces had "neutralised... a number of remnants of Assad's militias" in the Tartous countryside, and that it was pursuing others.
Reports say the security forces had earlier been ambushed as they tried to arrest a former officer in connection to his role at the notorious Saydnaya prison, close to the capital, Damascus.