Trump's war on disaster response

For discussion of religion and politics

Moderators: $iljanus, LawBeefaroni

Post Reply
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 57165
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Trump's war on disaster response

Post by Smoove_B »

I feel like this needs a dedicated thread:
President Trump has signed an executive order directing state and local governments to "play a more active and significant role" in preparing for disasters. For months, Trump has said he's considering getting rid of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the country's disaster response arm.

"I say you don't need FEMA, you need a good state government," Trump said while visiting the Los Angeles fires in January. "FEMA is a very expensive, in my opinion, mostly failed situation."

But emergency management experts say Trump's order technically wouldn't do much to shift responsibility. Currently, local and state governments are already in charge of disasters. The question is whether the Trump administration will begin withdrawing the federal resources and funding that states rely on.
As noted, most response is state and local. What those state and local responders rely on, however, is (1) funding (to a large degree) to backstop what they're asked to do and then sometimes (2) extra support (specialists) depending on the nature of the disaster that's being addressed.
Without FEMA, states would need to find thousands of additional personnel to inspect damage, distribute disaster aid and plan the rebuilding of public infrastructure. Without federal funding, states would face billions of dollars in recovery costs. After Hurricane Irma in 2017, Florida relied on more than $5.5 billion dollars from the federal government.

FEMA also helps states prepare for disasters, which can reduce the damage they cause and the number of lives that are lost. One study from the National Institute of Building Sciences, a non-profit research group, found that federal investment of $27 billion since 1995 to prepare infrastructure for flooding will ultimately save $160 billion. Many state emergency management offices also rely on federal grants to pay their employees.
So what's the plan?
Trump has ordered the creation of a new council to do a "full-scale review" of FEMA, including recommendations for how to reform the agency. Their report is due within six months of their first meeting, which has yet to take place.

Trump's latest executive order mandates that a new "National Resilience Strategy" be drafted, with the goal of "reducing taxpayer burdens through efficiency." Project 2025, the conservative policy agenda organized by the Heritage Foundation, says the majority of disaster costs should be shouldered by the states.

"For far too long, state and local governments have neglected investing in resilience, infrastructure, and disaster preparedness because they can count on an unlimited backstop from the federal government — an unsustainable and irresponsible strategy that has resulted in needless destruction and deaths of everyday Americans," White House spokesman Kush Desai said in an emailed statement.
Good luck, Red states. Though something tells me if you say "thank you" the aid will flow...
Maybe next year, maybe no go
User avatar
Skinypupy
Posts: 21537
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:12 am
Location: Utah

Re: Trump's war on disaster response

Post by Skinypupy »

I strongly suspect the decision tree for federal aid from this point forward will boil down to:

1. Are you a red state?
2. Do your elected leaders regularly and proudly kiss Trump's ass?

If the answer is yes to both, the federal aid dollars and support will flow freely. If it's no, you're on your own.
When darkness veils the world, four Warriors of Light shall come.
User avatar
$iljanus
Forum Moderator
Posts: 14096
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:46 pm
Location: New England...or under your bed

Re: Trump's war on disaster response

Post by $iljanus »

Glad you're using the "Trump's war on..." in the title! :D

The sad thing is that states and America in general doesn't spend enough on climate resilience. Under a sane administration you'd think you could get bipartisan support for solutions where the Federal government partners with states since blue and red states face the same issues. Unfortunately other than mentioning resilience this administration will use funding as a weapon so it truly is Trump's war on disaster response.
"Who's going to tell him that the job he's currently seeking might just be one of those Black jobs?"
-Michelle Obama 2024 Democratic Convention

Wise words of warning from Smoove B: Oh, how you all laughed when I warned you about the semen. Well, who's laughing now?
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 57165
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: Trump's war on disaster response

Post by Smoove_B »

It will certainly be something if that's what actually happens. Logically, it makes sense that it will, but it also seems like a really bold move to make - in either direction. If the plan is to nakedly support Red states that experience a disaster if they're willing to kiss his ass -or- if he truly is going to cut off the tap for everyone and expect all states to deal with disaster response on their own.

Either way, I'm convinced this is really a backdoor way to try and downplay climate change and the impacts we'll all be experiencing as conditions continue to get worse in the coming decade. Of course Red states are going to be disproportionately impacted overall, but they certainly won't be the only ones affected.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
User avatar
Skinypupy
Posts: 21537
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:12 am
Location: Utah

Re: Trump's war on disaster response

Post by Skinypupy »

I mean, we kinda already saw this with the LA wildfires when Trump essentially said, "Unless California implements [insert political issue completely unrelated to the disaster itself] then I'm not going to help them".

Would anyone be surprised if that gets writ large as the national go-to plan from here on out?
When darkness veils the world, four Warriors of Light shall come.
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 57165
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: Trump's war on disaster response

Post by Smoove_B »

It wouldn't, but it's just so overtly partisan I'd be amazed if it's able to slide. Then again, given the general response to everything else, maybe it will. I'm sure there will be strongly worded letters and maybe a committee meeting.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
User avatar
RunningMn9
Posts: 24777
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:55 pm
Location: The Sword Coast
Contact:

Re: Trump's war on disaster response

Post by RunningMn9 »

I like that we keep having to “reform” agencies, just because this dullard has no idea what they do or how well they are doing it.
And in banks across the world
Christians, Moslems, Hindus, Jews
And every other race, creed, colour, tint or hue
Get down on their knees and pray
The raccoon and the groundhog neatly
Make up bags of change
But the monkey in the corner
Well he's slowly drifting out of range
User avatar
Rumpy
Posts: 13632
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Re: Trump's war on disaster response

Post by Rumpy »

Skinypupy wrote: Fri Mar 21, 2025 4:49 pm I mean, we kinda already saw this with the LA wildfires when Trump essentially said, "Unless California implements [insert political issue completely unrelated to the disaster itself] then I'm not going to help them".

Would anyone be surprised if that gets writ large as the national go-to plan from here on out?
Yep, I believe we also saw it happen when NC had their disaster. It's disgraceful to politicize disaster relief.
PC:
Ryzen 5 3600
32GB RAM
2x1TB NVMe Drives
GTX 1660 Ti
User avatar
Holman
Posts: 30642
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: Trump's war on disaster response

Post by Holman »

Rumpy wrote: Fri Mar 21, 2025 7:07 pm Yep, I believe we also saw it happen when NC had their disaster. It's disgraceful to politicize disaster relief.
Absolutely.

What I expect to happen is not a complete Federal abdication of relief but a privatization of it geared to Trump cronies. Even better if the payments come from states rather than from Washington.

I wonder if Eric Prince or some other Trump acolyte might be invested in this.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
Post Reply