Political posturing: Who dares to be anti-children?

All discussions regarding Board, Card, and RPG Gaming, including industry discussion, that don't belong in one of the other gaming forums.

Moderators: The Preacher, $iljanus, Zaxxon

Post Reply
User avatar
Kraken
Posts: 45811
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: The Hub of the Universe
Contact:

Political posturing: Who dares to be anti-children?

Post by Kraken »

Illinois Senate OKs Video Game Restrictions
May 20, 2005 8:43 AM EDT

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. - The Illinois Senate approved a version of Gov. Rod Blagojevich's proposed restrictions on the sales of violent and sexually explicit video games to children, even though some senators said the idea is unconstitutional.

The measure approved Thursday would require store owners to determine which games are too violent or sexually explicit for anyone under 18. Anyone selling them to a minor could be fined.

Both chambers have now approved the video game restrictions, but the Senate version removed the possibility of jail time for offenders. That means the revised bill now goes back to the House.

The sponsor, Sen. Deanna Demuzio, denied the measure would interfere with free speech rights.

"Video games are not art or media," she said. "They are simulations, not all that different from the simulations used by the U.S. military in preparation for war."

But other senators said the courts have already struck down similar laws elsewhere. They predicted the Senate-approved measure would never take effect and the state would end up paying hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees.

Still, even some critics said they would not vote against the measure for fear it would be used against them politically.

"I'm going to vote for this bill, but I'm voting for it for one reason - because this is a political bill," said Sen. Mike Jacobs. "If I vote against it, it will show up in a campaign mail piece."
What can you say but "Grow a spine, guys"? Sheesh.
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 56531
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, bonded and licensed.

Post by LawBeefaroni »

Last I heard the bill, if passed, was expected to waste lots of taxpayer money en route to being struck down in court.

Law enforcement agencies have already said they won't bother policing this either. It's just Governor Leisure playing politics on a relative non-issue.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"“I like taking the guns early...to go to court would have taken a long time. So you could do exactly what you’re saying, but take the guns first, go through due process second.” -President Donald Trump.
"...To guard, protect, and maintain his liberty, the freedman should have the ballot; that the liberties of the American people were dependent upon the Ballot-box, the Jury-box, and the Cartridge-box, that without these no class of people could live and flourish in this country." - Frederick Douglass

MYT
User avatar
Sepiche
Posts: 8112
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 12:00 pm
Location: Olathe, KS

Post by Sepiche »

That's the first time I've heard the "simulation vs media" arguement though.

It's dumb. I would have stuck with the "It's training our kids to be killers" arguement. :P

s
User avatar
ChrisGwinn
Posts: 10396
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:23 pm
Location: Rake Trinket
Contact:

Post by ChrisGwinn »

Sepiche wrote:That's the first time I've heard the "simulation vs media" arguement though.

It's dumb. I would have stuck with the "It's training our kids to be killers" arguement. :P
I'm just waiting for some kid to run amuck with a big sticky ball, rolling up everything in the neighborhood. Good people don't let their kids play Katamari Damacy - it's an anarchistic star building simulator.
User avatar
Grundbegriff
Posts: 22277
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:46 am
Location: http://baroquepotion.com
Contact:

Re: Political posturing: Who dares to be anti-children?

Post by Grundbegriff »

Ironrod wrote:The sponsor, Sen. Deanna Demuzio, denied the measure would interfere with free speech rights.

"Video games are not art or media," she said. "They are simulations...."
A claim so manifestly absurd is unworthy of a detailed analysis and rebuttal.
User avatar
Mr. Fed
Posts: 15111
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:05 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Political posturing: Who dares to be anti-children?

Post by Mr. Fed »

Grundbegriff wrote:
Ironrod wrote:The sponsor, Sen. Deanna Demuzio, denied the measure would interfere with free speech rights.

"Video games are not art or media," she said. "They are simulations...."
A claim so manifestly absurd is unworthy of a detailed analysis and rebuttal.
I'm not sure whether she's really that ignorant or simply indifferent to truth and accuracy, or some mixture of both.
Popehat, a blog.
User avatar
ChrisGwinn
Posts: 10396
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:23 pm
Location: Rake Trinket
Contact:

Re: Political posturing: Who dares to be anti-children?

Post by ChrisGwinn »

Mr. Fed wrote:
Grundbegriff wrote:
Ironrod wrote:The sponsor, Sen. Deanna Demuzio, denied the measure would interfere with free speech rights.

"Video games are not art or media," she said. "They are simulations...."
A claim so manifestly absurd is unworthy of a detailed analysis and rebuttal.
I'm not sure whether she's really that ignorant or simply indifferent to truth and accuracy, or some mixture of both.
I've been asking that about a lot of politicians recently.
User avatar
CeeKay
Posts: 9174
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 9:13 am

Post by CeeKay »

Just because some politicians got molested by their fathers when they were children doesn't mean they have to ruin our gaming goodness.
CeeKay has left the building. See him exclusively at Gaming Trend!
User avatar
Creepy_Smell
Posts: 1844
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 5:30 pm
Location: Norman, OK
Contact:

Post by Creepy_Smell »

"The measure approved Thursday would require store owners to determine which games are too violent or sexually explicit for anyone under 18. Anyone selling them to a minor could be fined."

This part doesnt make sense. Unless its just a law passed to feel good/run next term on and not about enforcement.

If the store owner decides what is too violent/explicit why wouldn't they just decide none of them are? Issue solved.

Maybe its just flaky reporting.
User avatar
ImLawBoy
Forum Admin
Posts: 15579
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:49 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Post by ImLawBoy »

I'm so proud of my Governor!

Yes, a similar law was already struck down in the same Federal district, and this one will be too, but at least he's infusing some activity into our underused judicial system! And at least he has the guts to grandstand on a non-issue because it's an easy political gain!
That's my purse! I don't know you!
User avatar
Kraken
Posts: 45811
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: The Hub of the Universe
Contact:

Post by Kraken »

The sad part: It is politically more advantagous to "protect the children" than to defend free speech. I hope this never would've gotten traction if the courts weren't certain to strike it down.
Jeff V
Posts: 37039
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Nowhere you want to be.

Re: Political posturing: Who dares to be anti-children?

Post by Jeff V »

Grundbegriff wrote:
Ironrod wrote:The sponsor, Sen. Deanna Demuzio, denied the measure would interfere with free speech rights.

"Video games are not art or media," she said. "They are simulations...."
A claim so manifestly absurd is unworthy of a detailed analysis and rebuttal.
I'll strike you dead with my lethal mouse skills before you can say "poppycock."

As far as them growing a spine, this crap just goes to show what a death grip the insane right has on the nation's throat. Even in a solidly-democratic state like Illinois, the political weasels are petrified that tables will be turned against them. :x
Black Lives Matter
User avatar
Grundbegriff
Posts: 22277
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:46 am
Location: http://baroquepotion.com
Contact:

Re: Political posturing: Who dares to be anti-children?

Post by Grundbegriff »

Jeff V wrote:this crap just goes to show what a death grip the insane right has on the nation's throat.
Stupidity and incompetence cut across all ideological boundaries. The culturally paranoid right has its counterpart in the micromanagerial politically correct left.
Effidian
Posts: 1563
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 3:50 am

Post by Effidian »

Aren't movie theatres not supposed to let anyone under 17 in to see rated R movies without a parent? Wouldn't this just be the same thing for games? No one under 17 could buy a M rated game? Or is the movie thing just a practice by the industry and not law. (Not that I was ever carded when I was a kid, but I hear other people have been.)

Not defending the statements quoted above, they are ridiculous.
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 47140
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Post by Blackhawk »

Josh wrote: Or is the movie thing just a practice by the industry and not law.
Pretty much, yes, it is voluntary. I think porn would be a better comparison, personally, as it is a form of media legally restrained by age.
What doesn't kill me makes me stranger.
User avatar
tgb
Posts: 30690
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:33 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ

Post by tgb »

Well, I've been to one worlds fair, a picnic, and a rodeo, and that's the stupidest thing I ever heard come over a set of earphones.
I spent 90% of the money I made on women, booze, and drugs. The other 10% I just pissed away.
Harry F. Ishnuts
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 11:15 am

Post by Harry F. Ishnuts »

"And what's with all this talk about children? Save the children, help the children, what about the children...well, you know what I say? Fuck the children! Fuck 'em, they're getting entirely too much attention already!"

--George Carlin, "You Are All Diseased,"
User avatar
Peacedog
Posts: 13148
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 7:11 pm
Location: Despair, level 5
Contact:

Post by Peacedog »

I'm not sure whether she's really that ignorant or simply indifferent to truth and accuracy, or some mixture of both.
Yes.
User avatar
The Meal
Posts: 28192
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:33 pm
Location: 2005 Stanley Cup Champion

Post by The Meal »

Last night when purchasing tickets to Revenge of the Sith, I was asked if I wanted to donate $1 to the Children Fund. I said "No, let the children rot." The 14-year old taking my money seemed a bit abashed at my comment.

Last night when I was purchasing popcorn and drinks before the feature presentation at the theater I was asked if I wanted to donate $1 to the Children Fund. I declined. But my wife piped up and mentioned that it's my philosophy that "Children should rot." The sixteen year old manager taking my money seemed a bit disconcerted at the commentary.

The George Carlin routine sits well with me and my recent mood. :twisted:

(Yeah, I've got a child. That just means I've got front-line experience to validate my current feelings on the topic.)

~Neal
"Better to talk to people than communicate via tweet." — Elontra
User avatar
dbt1949
Posts: 26002
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:34 am
Location: Spiro Oklahoma

Post by dbt1949 »

They should have Michael Jackson go and testify before their hearings. :shock:
Ye Olde Farte
Double Ought Forty
aka dbt1949
User avatar
raydude
Posts: 4155
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:22 am

Post by raydude »

ChrisGwinn wrote:
Sepiche wrote:That's the first time I've heard the "simulation vs media" arguement though.

It's dumb. I would have stuck with the "It's training our kids to be killers" arguement. :P
I'm just waiting for some kid to run amuck with a big sticky ball, rolling up everything in the neighborhood. Good people don't let their kids play Katamari Damacy - it's an anarchistic star building simulator.
This looks like the beginnings of a great "Truth" commercial. Have someone roll a big ball made of chairs, newspapers, and other things up into the Senator's chambers and tell her that it is the real version of the video game simulator.
User avatar
edosan
Posts: 1039
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 5:34 pm
Location: Colorado

Post by edosan »

Creepy_Smell wrote:...This part doesnt make sense. Unless its just a law passed to feel good/run next term on and not about enforcement...
And what doesn't make sense about that? Politicians getting some good press on a "this one will look good in my campaign brochure" law.
Post Reply