When did PC games start to die?
Moderators: The Preacher, $iljanus, Zaxxon
-
- Posts: 2034
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 2:33 am
- Location: q-space
When did PC games start to die?
For all those who think PC games are dying, when exactly was the beginning of the end?
- Veloxi
- Posts: 1030
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 1:24 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Contact:
- knob
- Posts: 3446
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:19 am
- Location: St. Louis
- Contact:
- Victoria Raverna
- Posts: 5938
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:23 am
- Location: Jakarta
-
- Posts: 37041
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 7:17 pm
- Location: Nowhere you want to be.
Fortunately, this will never happen.Victoria Raverna wrote:The end of PC gaming to me is when all games use Starforce copy protection.
There is too much of an installed base for it to "die." What could very well happen is that the development cost of AAA titles using the hottest technology becomes too high to support a PC-only release. However, I find these games largely worthless in the first place; the games I buy are only available on PC and will never be made for consoles. This is a persistent market that just won't die.
Black Lives Matter
- razgon
- Posts: 2753
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 5:15 am
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
- Blackhawk
- Posts: 47144
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
- Location: Southwest Indiana
- razgon
- Posts: 2753
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 5:15 am
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
It's kinda like when canned food arrived. People predicted, that now ordinary people would stop making food themselves, and just buy it canned.
Or, when internet shopping became possible, EVERYONE would stay at home, NEVER leaving the house again, because we didnt need to.
Doomsayers are always the most loudspoken
Or, when internet shopping became possible, EVERYONE would stay at home, NEVER leaving the house again, because we didnt need to.
Doomsayers are always the most loudspoken

Gone...
- qp
- Posts: 4103
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:48 am
- Location: Port Hope, ON
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 2781
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:38 am
- Kraken
- Posts: 45818
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: The Hub of the Universe
- Contact:
I'm pretty sure 1998 was the year that Sierra sent word down to the troops: No More B Titles. They deliberately killed off their small niche brands to focus exclusively on the big budget, big hype, mass market games that gradually ruined the hobby. Even though the industry trend was already established by the time Sierra caught on, that's the symbollic year that I chose.
- The Meal
- Posts: 28192
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:33 pm
- Location: 2005 Stanley Cup Champion
Similarly I made a symbolic choice for 2003, likely for the same reasons Blackhawk mentioned. For my style of gaming, however, I don't think the PC will every die as an exciting platform.Ironrod wrote:...that's the symbollic year that I chose.
~Neal
"Better to talk to people than communicate via tweet." — Elontra
- JonathanStrange
- Posts: 5044
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 9:21 am
- Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
- Contact:
Yeah, I see the possibility that as the bigger companies seek higher returns elsewhere, there will be a seemingly fallow period in which smaller companies will be more likely to make the innovative games, which will inspire other games, attracting more gamer dollars, and getting the attention of the bigger companies who will briefly return to play catchup and then begin the cycle again.Valael wrote:I don't think it'll ever die. Maybe the big publishers/devs will go almost exclusively console, but then we'd still have plenty of other people making games (Fate, M&B, Geneforge, etc).

The opinions expressed by JonathanStrange are solely those of JonathanStrange and do not reflect the opinions of OctopusOverlords.com, the forum members of OctopusOverlords, the elusive Mr. Norrell, or JonathanStrange.
Books Read 2013
Books Read 2013
- The Preacher
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 13037
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 11:57 am
Ditto, except sub 2002 for 2003.The Meal wrote:Similarly I made a symbolic choice for 2003, likely for the same reasons Blackhawk mentioned. For my style of gaming, however, I don't think the PC will every die as an exciting platform.Ironrod wrote:...that's the symbollic year that I chose.
I'm not afraid of the death of pc gaming but I am saddened by its general decline. Of course, there are still more games available than I have time to play.
You do not take from this universe. It grants you what it will.
-
- Posts: 2781
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:38 am
- Blackhawk
- Posts: 47144
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
- Location: Southwest Indiana
Just to clarify my reasons for saying '03, that was the year, in my recollection, that cross platform became the rule rather than the exception. That both changed the style of big name PC games, and lessened the chances of certain types of titles seeing the mainstream. As a result, the big publishers became less PC focused, and the best PC titles started coming from independents and international developers. The process is just reaching a climax now, and certainly started prior to '03, but that, in my opinion, was the signature year that defined the trend of the change.The Meal wrote:Similarly I made a symbolic choice for 2003, likely for the same reasons Blackhawk mentioned. For my style of gaming, however, I don't think the PC will every die as an exciting platform.Ironrod wrote:...that's the symbollic year that I chose.
~Neal
What doesn't kill me makes me stranger.
- farley2k
- Posts: 5752
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 7:29 pm
I love it when people say "PC gaming will never die!", etc.
The death of PC gaming isn't a state of no games being made. It is when you can't buy PC games at easily accessible retail outlets. When you go to Best Buy, Target, etc. and there are no PC games.
Sure PC games will still exist, but they won't be where the cutting edge stuff is being done. Actually that is already going on I would say.
The death of PC gaming isn't a state of no games being made. It is when you can't buy PC games at easily accessible retail outlets. When you go to Best Buy, Target, etc. and there are no PC games.
Sure PC games will still exist, but they won't be where the cutting edge stuff is being done. Actually that is already going on I would say.
Never, under any circumstances, take a sleeping pill and a laxative the same night
- Dave Barry
- Dave Barry
- The Preacher
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 13037
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 11:57 am
There's this new fad called "buying online". Catch the wave and you're sitting on top of the world.farley2k wrote:The death of PC gaming isn't a state of no games being made. It is when you can't buy PC games at easily accessible retail outlets. When you go to Best Buy, Target, etc. and there are no PC games.

You do not take from this universe. It grants you what it will.
- baron calamity
- Posts: 2803
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 11:47 am
- Location: 127.0.0.1 @ Maryland
- Contact:
- Dave Allen
- Posts: 957
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:12 am
- Location: New London, CT
- Grundbegriff
- Posts: 22277
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:46 am
- Location: http://baroquepotion.com
- Contact:
Why should that be construed, metaphorically, as death rather than as transcedence and liberation? "If you strike me down, Vader, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!"farley2k wrote:The death of PC gaming isn't a state of no games being made. It is when you can't buy PC games at easily accessible retail outlets.
As private distribution becomes more important, the cutting edge stuff will bypass grand scale retail outlets entirely.Sure PC games will still exist, but they won't be where the cutting edge stuff is being done. Actually that is already going on I would say.
- yossar
- Posts: 6344
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 2:20 am
- Location: West Side
As soon as that happens I might start noticing the general decline and become sad. But for me I still have more fun games than I have time and the quality seems to be getting better every year. If anything, certain genres of PC games are dying (or at least on a decline). But that happens even in industries that are healthy. How many Western movies get made nowadays?The Preacher wrote:I'm not afraid of the death of pc gaming but I am saddened by its general decline. Of course, there are still more games available than I have time to play.
Edit: And why have I never heard of this Gish game?
- Suitably Ironic Moniker
- Posts: 3628
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 9:09 pm
- Location: Asheville, NC
Well, movie revenues have been significantly down this year and there have been no westerns released. Coincidence? I think so! Still, I'd pay for a good western.yossar wrote:If anything, certain genres of PC games are dying (or at least on a decline). But that happens even in industries that are healthy. How many Western movies get made nowadays?
When I was a boy, I laid in my twin-sized bed and wondered where my brother was. - Mitch Hedberg
-
- Posts: 37041
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 7:17 pm
- Location: Nowhere you want to be.
Courtesy of Moby Games
Game Releases by Platform by Year
2004 - Windows 572, PS2 255, Xbox 164
2003 - Windows 685, PS2 306, Xbox 205
2002 - Windows 619, PS2 264, Xbox 167
2001 - Windows 583, PS2 165 PS 129
The current year is panning out thusly:
2005 - Windows 199, PS2 75, Xbox 65
Okay you whining Chicken Littles, where above is the evidence that PC gaming is dying?
Game Releases by Platform by Year
2004 - Windows 572, PS2 255, Xbox 164
2003 - Windows 685, PS2 306, Xbox 205
2002 - Windows 619, PS2 264, Xbox 167
2001 - Windows 583, PS2 165 PS 129
The current year is panning out thusly:
2005 - Windows 199, PS2 75, Xbox 65
Okay you whining Chicken Littles, where above is the evidence that PC gaming is dying?
Black Lives Matter
- farley2k
- Posts: 5752
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 7:29 pm
Jeff V wrote:Courtesy of Moby Games
Game Releases by Platform by Year
2004 - Windows 572, PS2 255, Xbox 164
2003 - Windows 685, PS2 306, Xbox 205
2002 - Windows 619, PS2 264, Xbox 167
2001 - Windows 583, PS2 165 PS 129
The current year is panning out thusly:
2005 - Windows 199, PS2 75, Xbox 65
Okay you whining Chicken Littles, where above is the evidence that PC gaming is dying?
Wow! Your right! When I walk into Gamestop and EB they just have hidden the huge PC games section! Same at Best Buy, Target and Wal-mart. Thye are just teasing!
Never, under any circumstances, take a sleeping pill and a laxative the same night
- Dave Barry
- Dave Barry
- Blackhawk
- Posts: 47144
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
- Location: Southwest Indiana
There are a few things about the shrinking PC selection at mainstream stores that people tend to ignore, compared to, say, five years ago. The first is smaller boxes. That by itself probably shrunk the section by 20%. The second is that they now only display one or two copies of 90% of their games, as opposed to entire stacks of them five years ago. One title now gets probably 1.5"x7"x5". Five years ago it would have had 10"x11"x7" - just the different method of display of games is responsible for about a 50% reduction in shelf space without removing a single title.
Finally, in my experience, most of what has been cut has been out of date titles. You used to see walls of games stretching back over the last three or four years, most of it marked down to really low prices. Now you see mostly games released in the last 18 months, which again cuts down on the number of titles on the shelves without accurately reflecting the number of releases.
The point is people look at the B&Ms and the fact that they only have 20% of the space they did five years ago devoted to PC games, and use that as evidence that PC gaming is gasping for breath, when simple repackaging, display methods, and outdated inventory reduction are responsible for probably 60 of that 80% reduction in space.
Now, I'm not denying that they have cut a bunch of retail space and services - they certainly have. Some B&Ms have even cut PC games altogether. There is a funny thing about PC gamers - virtually all of them own computers! The majority are also connected to the internet. There have been plenty of articles in recent years about how a huge percentage of customers have turned to online shopping over traditional retail, causing all sorts of reorganizations across in all sorts of traditionally retail industries. If a huge percentage of your customers stop buying your off-the-shelf merchandise and start buying it online, it only makes sense to move the products they prefer to purchase online off of your shelves to make room for products bought by offline customers, and, as mentioned, PC gamers = PC users. Yeah, there may have been a marked decline in how B&Ms cater to PC gamers over the last five years, but what about making the same comparison with online shopping? How do EBGames.com, Gamestop.com, Amazon, and GoGamer compare to five years ago?
Once again, PC gaming is changing. The top, high-end developers and publishers are releasing a different type of high-advertising, high-hype, high-potential game than a few years ago, while smaller developers and international developers fill in the niche titles that the larger developers have dropped. Independent developers are becoming a reality, rather than a novelty. More developers are beginning to break the traditional dev/publisher model and self-publishing or opting for online distribution. Sales are moving off of the shelves and onto the internet.
Like I said before, so long as there is an established, millions-strong customer base ready to spend money, there will be companies developing products for them. We just happen to be in a phase in which the high-end dev/pub model is breaking, mainstream publishers are taking the Wal-Mart business model, smaller companies are filling in the holes, game design is approaching a graphical and auditory limbo which forces a different approach to development, and so on.
The gaming industry has sort of stagnated over the last three years, and when an industry stagnates, you can expect to see a bit of a collapse (lots of buy-outs, major companies closing, lots of small companies starting up with a new approach), followed by a bit of chaos, followed by a reestablishment of a more efficient, more effective form of the industry. Collapse, chaos, reestablishment. It happens all the time, in all sorts of industries. We're in the chaos phase right now. Again, things are changing, not dying.
Finally, in my experience, most of what has been cut has been out of date titles. You used to see walls of games stretching back over the last three or four years, most of it marked down to really low prices. Now you see mostly games released in the last 18 months, which again cuts down on the number of titles on the shelves without accurately reflecting the number of releases.
The point is people look at the B&Ms and the fact that they only have 20% of the space they did five years ago devoted to PC games, and use that as evidence that PC gaming is gasping for breath, when simple repackaging, display methods, and outdated inventory reduction are responsible for probably 60 of that 80% reduction in space.
Now, I'm not denying that they have cut a bunch of retail space and services - they certainly have. Some B&Ms have even cut PC games altogether. There is a funny thing about PC gamers - virtually all of them own computers! The majority are also connected to the internet. There have been plenty of articles in recent years about how a huge percentage of customers have turned to online shopping over traditional retail, causing all sorts of reorganizations across in all sorts of traditionally retail industries. If a huge percentage of your customers stop buying your off-the-shelf merchandise and start buying it online, it only makes sense to move the products they prefer to purchase online off of your shelves to make room for products bought by offline customers, and, as mentioned, PC gamers = PC users. Yeah, there may have been a marked decline in how B&Ms cater to PC gamers over the last five years, but what about making the same comparison with online shopping? How do EBGames.com, Gamestop.com, Amazon, and GoGamer compare to five years ago?
Once again, PC gaming is changing. The top, high-end developers and publishers are releasing a different type of high-advertising, high-hype, high-potential game than a few years ago, while smaller developers and international developers fill in the niche titles that the larger developers have dropped. Independent developers are becoming a reality, rather than a novelty. More developers are beginning to break the traditional dev/publisher model and self-publishing or opting for online distribution. Sales are moving off of the shelves and onto the internet.
Like I said before, so long as there is an established, millions-strong customer base ready to spend money, there will be companies developing products for them. We just happen to be in a phase in which the high-end dev/pub model is breaking, mainstream publishers are taking the Wal-Mart business model, smaller companies are filling in the holes, game design is approaching a graphical and auditory limbo which forces a different approach to development, and so on.
The gaming industry has sort of stagnated over the last three years, and when an industry stagnates, you can expect to see a bit of a collapse (lots of buy-outs, major companies closing, lots of small companies starting up with a new approach), followed by a bit of chaos, followed by a reestablishment of a more efficient, more effective form of the industry. Collapse, chaos, reestablishment. It happens all the time, in all sorts of industries. We're in the chaos phase right now. Again, things are changing, not dying.
What doesn't kill me makes me stranger.
- The Preacher
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 13037
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 11:57 am
- razgon
- Posts: 2753
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 5:15 am
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
Of course not. But some of the highest ranked computer games are recent, at least according to Gamerankings.comThe Preacher wrote:# of Releases =? QualityJeff V wrote:Okay you whining Chicken Littles, where above is the evidence that PC gaming is dying?
1. Half-Life 2 PC VU Games 95.8% 95.4%
2. Grand Theft Auto: Vice City PC Rockstar Games 8.7 93.7% 94.9%
3. Half-Life PC Sierra Entertainment 94.1% 94.5%
4. Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn PC Interplay 93.6% 94.4%
5. Unreal Tournament PC GT Interactive 93.6% 94.1%
6. Grand Theft Auto III PC Rockstar Games 90.8% 93.5%
7. Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic PC LucasArts 92.9% 93.4%
8. Unreal Tournament 2004 PC Atari 92.8% 93.4%
9. System Shock 2 PC Looking Glass Studios 91.7% 93.0%
10. Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos PC Blizzard Entertainment 92.6% 92.8%
first percentage score is overall score, second is main score over at www.gamerankings.com
hope it helped.
Gone...
- Kraken
- Posts: 45818
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: The Hub of the Universe
- Contact:
PC gaming is dying as mainstream entertainment. As PC games are slowly squeezed out of the retail channels, they return to their origins as a niche hobby. Since mass marketing and big budgets are what's killing the industry in the first place, that is a Good Thing. Quality and innovation will return when big corporate attention focuses elsewhere and PC game studios can again afford to ignore the demands of the Konsole Kiddies.farley2k wrote:I love it when people say "PC gaming will never die!", etc.
The death of PC gaming isn't a state of no games being made. It is when you can't buy PC games at easily accessible retail outlets. When you go to Best Buy, Target, etc. and there are no PC games.
Sure PC games will still exist, but they won't be where the cutting edge stuff is being done. Actually that is already going on I would say.
- DOS=HIGH
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 8:06 am
That could be the most prehistoric comment I've ever read on these boards. I'd also be interested in what cutting edge gaming I'm missing on the PC that I can only get on an X-box or PS2.farley2k wrote:The death of PC gaming isn't a state of no games being made. It is when you can't buy PC games at easily accessible retail outlets. When you go to Best Buy, Target, etc. and there are no PC games.
Sure PC games will still exist, but they won't be where the cutting edge stuff is being done. Actually that is already going on I would say.
Next gen consoles are certainly going to be interesting and have a performance advantage over the PC. But the PC will catch up and pass them again before the PS4 or X-Box 720? hit the sales floor at Best Buy. I think some of you have been brainwashed by mass media and marketing. Sure there is a lot of crap in PC gaming but HL2, WoW, IL2 series, Rise of Nations, Combat Mission series, and many other games considered the best in thier genre are currently only available on the PC.
- The Preacher
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 13037
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 11:57 am
Well, there's a couple things here. First is that gamerankings, as good as it may be, doesn't have scores for old games. I can't tell what year exactly their records start, but it's not much before 1997. For instance, try to find out how Ultima IV, a near-universally praised game, ranks.razgon wrote:But some of the highest ranked computer games are recent, at least according to Gamerankings.com
Second, there is no question in my mind that the best games are some of the best ever made. HL2, for instance, is a just a great game. The question is a more generalized quality*quantity index. Now this is damn hard to judge and is largely going to be personal. For instance, grognards go ga-ga for WiTP but it has a very niche market (it also only had a single review score on gamerankings).
My last observation is that 30% of those games are ports from consoles to the PC. That doesn't exactly harken to glory days of PC gaming.
You do not take from this universe. It grants you what it will.
- Ridah
- Posts: 1036
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 2:02 am
People keep saying the new consoles are so cutting edge that they blow PC graphics away but I'm telling you, Oblivion is going to look just as good on the PC as it will the Xbox, if not better. PC games, I believe, are almost already at the level of what the PS3 and Xbox2 have to offer.Next gen consoles are certainly going to be interesting and have a performance advantage over the PC. But the PC will catch up and pass them again before the PS4 or X-Box 720? hit the sales floor at Best Buy.