Page 1 of 1

Critique this LCD monitor before I buy...

Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:11 pm
by triggercut
As usual, gift certificate/card to MicroCenter from the ones who love me most for Christmas...:D

Anyway, I'm thinking of stepping into the LCD realm for the first time on a monitor. Here's the specs:


19" monitor
16 ms response time
.294 dot pitch
16.7 million color support
250 cd/m2 image brightness
450:1 image contrast ratio
1280x1024 native resolution

I'm not sure what some of those things are. I assume the larger the ratio on contrast, the better?

Not sure on the image brightness, either.

I know the 16ms response time is very good.

Now, for the reason it's in my price range: analog connection only, no dvi. I have never had problems with image distortion with my 19" CRT, and my vid card is a 6800GT. From every resource I can find on the internet, apparently unless you've got super-sharp photographer's eyes (I most assuredly don't), you'll never notice the difference between dvi and analog on a modern vidcard. Anyone with experience on this?

Anyone see any other red flags?

Thanks in advance!

Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:15 pm
by Smoove_B
I think there is a HUGE difference between the DVI and analog connections. I have both options available on my LCD and have two computers hooked up to it. Flipping back and forth there is a noticable difference in sharpness, especially the fonts in WinXP.


I don't have the best eyes and couldn't offer a scientific analysis, I just think it "looks more gooder".

Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 7:00 pm
by triggercut
Interesting, thanks Smoov.

Well, for about $125 more I can get Sony's SDMHS94P. 12ms response, and dvi/analog support. The only problem with it (in otherwise glowing reviews) is that it has backlighting problems that show black as a dullish dark grey instead.

I think I might be able to live with that, since that would be mostly a problem with dvd's that letterbox (I rarely watch dvd's on my desktop computer) and with photoshopping (which I'm too stupid to do). Maybe I'll go that direction instead...

Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:08 pm
by gorham09
Don't forget the $100 reabte on the Sony. If I may ask, where did you find the reviews on the Sony? I was considering buying an LCD and had it narrowed down to the Sony or the more expensive Viewsonic VP912b, but I had a hard time tracking down reviews on them.

Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:30 pm
by Zekester
and yet......although the DVI connection on mine is indeed sharper, I actually prefer the softer look that the analog connection gives.

To each their own.

Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 3:49 am
by Pyperkub
One potential drawback - native res of 1280x1024 means no 1600x1200 gaming for you.

Potential, because for non-gaming use 16x12 is tough to read...