More Sinclaire Group Wackiness
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2004 7:35 am
Sinclaire fires Bureau Chief who spoke out
I'm personally not too concerned about the firing. He knew the consequences of speaking out. He even mentioned it. He knew he was working for an unethical company and that's the bottom line. I love how they even came out and said they wouldn't waive his non-compete.
What really boggles the mind is that in addition to the farscical "documentary", they are producing an hour long news special about their "documentary". And then they have a gall to state "we are disappointed that Jon's political views caused him to violate company policy and speak to the press about company business." What bunch of creeps. I'm glad that this bunch of hypocrits owns 62 stations and come Bush's re-election will consolidate more power.
[/url]
I'm personally not too concerned about the firing. He knew the consequences of speaking out. He even mentioned it. He knew he was working for an unethical company and that's the bottom line. I love how they even came out and said they wouldn't waive his non-compete.
What really boggles the mind is that in addition to the farscical "documentary", they are producing an hour long news special about their "documentary". And then they have a gall to state "we are disappointed that Jon's political views caused him to violate company policy and speak to the press about company business." What bunch of creeps. I'm glad that this bunch of hypocrits owns 62 stations and come Bush's re-election will consolidate more power.
[/url]