Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:32 pm
He didn't expect bb to talk - he expected him to die!
Well.
That sucks.
Octopus Overlords
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
Lynching Liaisons - The End
Page 35 of 60
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:34 pm
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 2
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:34 pm
While that would suck it would be less damaging than the Berserker killing me.LordMortis wrote:Or the hunter, I guess.Remus West wrote:Lets pray he is not the Berserker.
bb2112
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:36 pm
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:39 pm
Well, having now read the rest of the way through to find he was a villager, I have to say it sucks but other than claiming Hunter there wasn't anything he could have said to stay my vote.Unagi wrote:What the hell????
Remus, why on earth didn't you wait for him to talk??
Anyway, I agree with LordMortis regarding who to protect tonight. If I die tonight triggercut can use his seance to get my scan result and since he claimed a role that can be openly verified if he fails to be able to seance me (or the Cabal announce that Newcastle was the Medium) then it is as good as having gotten a wolf with the scan anyway.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 2
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:42 pm
I don't concur. The berzerker killing you would mean one less wolf. Are you as the seer going to bring us more than that tomorrow with a scan tonight? A living hunter buys the end game an extra kill. No matter. We'll know about you come morning, one way or another.Remus West wrote:While that would suck it would be less damaging than the Berserker killing me.LordMortis wrote:Or the hunter, I guess.Remus West wrote:Lets pray he is not the Berserker.
bb2112
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:47 pm
My Gut reaction.. a bunch of wolves just saved Scoops hide.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:49 pm
Oh and I am advocating to scan bb2112 
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 2:13 pm
lynch em' all!tru1cy wrote:My Gut reaction.. a bunch of wolves just saved Scoops hide.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 2:14 pm
I was about to accuse someone then realized it's night 
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 2:14 pm
You mean have the cabal scan bb2112 instead of Newcastle?tru1cy wrote:Oh and I am advocating to scan bb2112
By contrast, I would advocate that the Cabal not suddenly go crazy.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 2:24 pm
Newcastle needs to be scanned. Wolves don't know what BB was either. They know what Newcastle was though and we do not.tru1cy wrote:Oh and I am advocating to scan bb2112
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 2
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 2:28 pm
well if he was the berserker he could have killed you nonetheless. I'm not following this?Remus West wrote:While that would suck it would be less damaging than the Berserker killing me.LordMortis wrote:Or the hunter, I guess.Remus West wrote:Lets pray he is not the Berserker.
bb2112
Stessiers write up would not have happened until the zerker turned in his kill order.Beserker - responsible for turning in Night Kill before deadline if Alpha & Beta are dead. If lynched, can choose one player to kill before being lynched.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 2:34 pm
Not sure what you are having trouble following, Lassr. LordMortis commented on my vote post where I said I was hoping he was not the Berserker - since I did not want to die without one more scan.
tru1cy, I hope you guys choose one of the dead and go from there. Use the information you gain to the village's advantage. Do not tell who you are intending to scan nor who you did scan until you are ready.
tru1cy, I hope you guys choose one of the dead and go from there. Use the information you gain to the village's advantage. Do not tell who you are intending to scan nor who you did scan until you are ready.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 2:38 pm
In response to complaints that you should've held off on the kill vote until bb spoke, in case he was the hunter, you said that killing the hunter would be less damaging than the Berserker killing you. Lassr read that (reasonably) as arguing that it was better to kill bb now in order to avoid the Berserker killing you. Lassr was thus pointing out that the Berserker could still kill you even though you cast the early kill vote (i.e. before bb could respond or do something).Remus West wrote:Not sure what you are having trouble following, Lassr. LordMortis commented on my vote post where I said I was hoping he was not the Berserker - since I did not want to die without one more scan.
tru1cy, I hope you guys choose one of the dead and go from there. Use the information you gain to the village's advantage. Do not tell who you are intending to scan nor who you did scan until you are ready.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 2:40 pm
I also hope that the Cabal choose one of the dead, as if they choose one of the living their power would fail. And yeah, don't tell everyone that you are intending to scan Newcastle even though of course you're going to scan Newcastle because scanning bb would be first rate lunacy. But just don't tell anyone.Remus West wrote:
tru1cy, I hope you guys choose one of the dead and go from there. Use the information you gain to the village's advantage. Do not tell who you are intending to scan nor who you did scan until you are ready.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 2:59 pm
You make no sense. Or I am insane since there is nothing that leads me to think that a reasonable reading. I said it would suck if bb2112 were the Hunter but that it would suck more if he were the Berserker. Where do you go from there to killing him now? Timing of his death had absolutely nothing to do with it.El Guapo wrote:In response to complaints that you should've held off on the kill vote until bb spoke, in case he was the hunter, you said that killing the hunter would be less damaging than the Berserker killing you. Lassr read that (reasonably) as arguing that it was better to kill bb now in order to avoid the Berserker killing you. Lassr was thus pointing out that the Berserker could still kill you even though you cast the early kill vote (i.e. before bb could respond or do something).Remus West wrote:Not sure what you are having trouble following, Lassr. LordMortis commented on my vote post where I said I was hoping he was not the Berserker - since I did not want to die without one more scan.
tru1cy, I hope you guys choose one of the dead and go from there. Use the information you gain to the village's advantage. Do not tell who you are intending to scan nor who you did scan until you are ready.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 3:01 pm
Ah, I read it as if you were saying you voted to kill him before he could talk in case he was the zerker....Remus West wrote:Not sure what you are having trouble following, Lassr. LordMortis commented on my vote post where I said I was hoping he was not the Berserker - since I did not want to die without one more scan.
.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 3:03 pm
Remus West wrote:I am insane
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 3:03 pm
I get that. But the exchanges roughly go like this:Remus West wrote:You make no sense. Or I am insane since there is nothing that leads me to think that a reasonable reading. I said it would suck if bb2112 were the Hunter but that it would suck more if he were the Berserker. Where do you go from there to killing him now? Timing of his death had absolutely nothing to do with it.El Guapo wrote:In response to complaints that you should've held off on the kill vote until bb spoke, in case he was the hunter, you said that killing the hunter would be less damaging than the Berserker killing you. Lassr read that (reasonably) as arguing that it was better to kill bb now in order to avoid the Berserker killing you. Lassr was thus pointing out that the Berserker could still kill you even though you cast the early kill vote (i.e. before bb could respond or do something).Remus West wrote:Not sure what you are having trouble following, Lassr. LordMortis commented on my vote post where I said I was hoping he was not the Berserker - since I did not want to die without one more scan.
tru1cy, I hope you guys choose one of the dead and go from there. Use the information you gain to the village's advantage. Do not tell who you are intending to scan nor who you did scan until you are ready.
(1) People complain that you cast the kill vote although bb could've been the hunter
(2) You post "yeah it would suck if he were the hunter but killing the hunter is less damaging than the Berserker killing me"
Makes it sound a bit like you made the kill accepting the risk of killing the hunter because that risk is less damaging than the risk of the Berserker killing you. I get that's not what you were saying, but that's what pr0ner thought you were saying.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 3:05 pm
I agree with this but everyone was asking why you didn't let him talk and I saw your response and wonder what the hell it meant compared to that situation.Remus West wrote: I said it would suck if bb2112 were the Hunter but that it would suck more if he were the Berserker.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 3:06 pm
What..you ..gah! &^5$#@(!&El Guapo wrote:...... but that's what pr0ner thought you were saying.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 3:26 pm
If the Wolves would please eat Chaosraven, as I will leave for a 4day trip tuesday morning, that would avoid any potential Hunter Protect/Wolf Kill conflicting orders resulting in a miss.
That way, if neither bb2112 and Newcastle were the Hunter, we still have a shot and lots of Potential Blockage among our Medium Mentalist, Seer and Cabal for later.
Also, if the Hunter is alive and among our Questionable Alignment lists, he can stay hidden and unkilled.
Right here, Wolvies, niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice juicy Chaosraven, that's right, no eating important people...
That way, if neither bb2112 and Newcastle were the Hunter, we still have a shot and lots of Potential Blockage among our Medium Mentalist, Seer and Cabal for later.
Also, if the Hunter is alive and among our Questionable Alignment lists, he can stay hidden and unkilled.
Right here, Wolvies, niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice juicy Chaosraven, that's right, no eating important people...
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 3:30 pm
Ah. It meant I had not considered that he might be the Hunter so when LM brought it up it occurred to me that "that would suck" but that it would be worse if he were the Berserker because then I'd be dead right now.Lassr wrote:I agree with this but everyone was asking why you didn't let him talk and I saw your response and wonder what the hell it meant compared to that situation.Remus West wrote: I said it would suck if bb2112 were the Hunter but that it would suck more if he were the Berserker.
Although, to be completely candid, LM's later comment makes a tone of sense to me that hitting the berserker would have meant one less wolf I think it a sketchy comment because we don't really need to find the wolves right now. We need to eliminate where they can hide then take a scorched earth policy to the rest of the area. My scan can expand our knowns while whittling down the shadows. The hunter can only whittle down the shadows. I stand by it being better that he was villager than berserker for that reason.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 3:41 pm
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 4:03 pm
Post 4 ghosts for hunter, 5 ghosts for villager.bb2112 wrote:
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 4:15 pm
I still don't concur. But again none of it will matter tomorrow. You will be exposed as villager/wolf one way or another. Not allowing bb2112 to speak will be what it will be.Remus West wrote:Although, to be completely candid, LM's later comment makes a tone of sense to me that hitting the berserker would have meant one less wolf I think it a sketchy comment because we don't really need to find the wolves right now. We need to eliminate where they can hide then take a scorched earth policy to the rest of the area. My scan can expand our knowns while whittling down the shadows. The hunter can only whittle down the shadows. I stand by it being better that he was villager than berserker for that reason.
And El Guapo is spoofing the medium. I would say vote for Guapo but he's made me laugh too much to want to lynch him. Damn you, Guapo!
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 7:26 pm
Newcastle did it too, and it's just wrong. We wait so that we learn what they say. It's simple. You may have removed the hunter, who was a provable role (never mind the shot itself). I don't think it was a good play at all, even though I was actually pretty sure he was going to come up wolf. You wait.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 7:26 pm
Lassr wrote:What..you ..gah! &^5$#@(!&El Guapo wrote:...... but that's what pr0ner thought you were saying.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 7:30 pm
Absolutely this.Lassr wrote:Newcastle needs to be scanned. Wolves don't know what BB was either. They know what Newcastle was though and we do not.tru1cy wrote:Oh and I am advocating to scan bb2112
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 7:35 pm
Unagi wrote:Absolutely this.Lassr wrote:Newcastle needs to be scanned. Wolves don't know what BB was either. They know what Newcastle was though and we do not.tru1cy wrote:Oh and I am advocating to scan bb2112
And this:
El Guapo wrote:You mean have the cabal scan bb2112 instead of Newcastle?tru1cy wrote:Oh and I am advocating to scan bb2112
By contrast, I would advocate that the Cabal not suddenly go crazy.
And this:
El Guapo wrote:I also hope that the Cabal choose one of the dead, as if they choose one of the living their power would fail. And yeah, don't tell everyone that you are intending to scan Newcastle even though of course you're going to scan Newcastle because scanning bb would be first rate lunacy. But just don't tell anyone.Remus West wrote:
tru1cy, I hope you guys choose one of the dead and go from there. Use the information you gain to the village's advantage. Do not tell who you are intending to scan nor who you did scan until you are ready.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 7:38 pm
Unagi wrote:Newcastle did it too, and it's just wrong. We wait so that we learn what they say. It's simple. You may have removed the hunter, who was a provable role (never mind the shot itself). I don't think it was a good play at all, even though I was actually pretty sure he was going to come up wolf. You wait.
Yes. This latest trend of ChaosraveN-1-ing is as baffling as it is unwise.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 9:28 pm
That was a flop.
We should've killed El Guap'.
We'll end up paying ransom.
We should've swatted handsome.
We should've killed El Guap'.
We'll end up paying ransom.
We should've swatted handsome.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 10:02 pm
We. I do not think that word means what you think it means.Grundbegriff wrote:That was a flop.
We should've killed El Guap'.
We'll end up paying ransom.
We should've swatted handsome.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 10:10 pm
I've consistently said
Which ones I want dead.
(The exception is triggercut;
I like how his jib is cut.)
Which ones I want dead.
(The exception is triggercut;
I like how his jib is cut.)
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 10:18 pm
I leave for the Smokie Mountains Sunday night and will be back Friday. I'm not sure if the cabin has wifi or not, it is not listed though, and that would suck.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 12:05 am
Grundbegriff wrote:I've consistently said
Which ones I want dead.
(The exception is triggercut;
I like how his jib is cut.)
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 3:53 am
Still think we should have lynched El Guapo. Odds are two wolves are in on the bb2112 lynch.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 3:56 am
When his vote was on El Guapo, "we" is appropriate.redrun wrote:We. I do not think that word means what you think it means.Grundbegriff wrote:That was a flop.
We should've killed El Guap'.
We'll end up paying ransom.
We should've swatted handsome.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Night 3
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 7:49 am
You and he are correct - I had forgotten that he'd voted for El Guapo.theohall wrote:When his vote was on El Guapo, "we" is appropriate.redrun wrote:We. I do not think that word means what you think it means.Grundbegriff wrote:That was a flop.
We should've killed El Guap'.
We'll end up paying ransom.
We should've swatted handsome.