Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 2:14 am
Never mind. I can't read.theohall wrote:Interesting that nobody currently has a vote on redrun, in spite of the "he's a wolf" talk about him.
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
Never mind. I can't read.theohall wrote:Interesting that nobody currently has a vote on redrun, in spite of the "he's a wolf" talk about him.
Uhhh...if stessier's post is correct bb2112 is not on the redrun train. He is voting Qantaga. As is redrun.Unagi wrote:(I'm in a training class this entire week)
Frankly, the redrun train would look better to me if bb2112 hadn't hopped on it after how he described hopping on the Theohall train.
Theohall's 'poking the silents', "C'mon, that's what we do!!", approach is exactly the mundane move he would use to hide as a wolf.
The theohall train is better. All Aboard !!
If? IF???????Remus West wrote:Uhhh...if stessier's post is correct bb2112 is not on the redrun train. He is voting Qantaga. As is redrun.Unagi wrote:(I'm in a training class this entire week)
Frankly, the redrun train would look better to me if bb2112 hadn't hopped on it after how he described hopping on the Theohall train.
Theohall's 'poking the silents', "C'mon, that's what we do!!", approach is exactly the mundane move he would use to hide as a wolf.
The theohall train is better. All Aboard !!
stessier wrote:If? IF???????Remus West wrote:Uhhh...if stessier's post is correct bb2112 is not on the redrun train. He is voting Qantaga. As is redrun.Unagi wrote:(I'm in a training class this entire week)
Frankly, the redrun train would look better to me if bb2112 hadn't hopped on it after how he described hopping on the Theohall train.
Theohall's 'poking the silents', "C'mon, that's what we do!!", approach is exactly the mundane move he would use to hide as a wolf.
The theohall train is better. All Aboard !!
How dare you question the infallibility of Stessier, the Generally Right!?!?!
Bam!
Not that you've never been wrong before.stessier wrote:So close...Lassr wrote:Replace the redrun vote against redrun with Remus....
Thanks!
triggercut wrote:So...wait. 17 players. 9 needed to swing someone.stessier wrote:Day 1 Vote Count
Votes required for lynch - 11Spoiler:
Against Qantaga (4) - redrun, bb2112, Chaosraven, Lagom Lite
Against redrun (3) - Lassr, Remus, RMC
Against Newcastle (2) - El Guapo, pr0ner
Against theohall (1) - Unagi
Against El Guapo (1) - Scoop
Against Scoop (1) - triggercut
Against Grundbegriff (1) - Newcastle
Against RMC (1) - Bakhtosh
Against Lagom LIte (1) - Qantaga
Against bb2112 (1) - theohall
No votes - Purge, Grundbegriff, tru1cy, Vorret, LordMortis
There are 17 villagers alive. The deadline for the lynch vote is June 6th at 9pm Eastern time.
Only 12 people have a registered vote on this update, so of the 12 people putting a hat in the ring, they need 9 to agree.
That's going to be tough to do!
Ok, does this hit anyone funny?stessier wrote:There are 17 Villagers & 4 wolves for a total of 21 players. Thus, the majority is 11.
Hence my title as Stessier the Generally Right.Remus West wrote:Not that you've never been wrong before.stessier wrote:So close...Lassr wrote:Replace the redrun vote against redrun with Remus....
Thanks!
I am S00per Sekrit Sneaky Agent Man. But as my name hits MANY lists, I don't think "flying under the radar" is applicable.redrun wrote:Chaos is trending towards fluff... so, it's normal for Chaos to spend a lot of time in the fluff zone, but normally he comes out of it at some point. Hey Chaos - who is being too quiet this game day? Who is flying under the radar? I'd just like to see something solid from you to look at.
total nonwolfraven wrote:It's not me, dude.
It's appreciated as it means I don't have to go looking for whom you had the vote on previously, but not required.El Guapo wrote:Oh, and withdraw Newcastle
.
Are we still requiring the withdrawal of accusations? Seems like a lot of people just accuse another person without withdrawing previous accusations.
If I keep you happy do I get an extra vote?stessier wrote:It's appreciated as it means I don't have to go looking for whom you had the vote on previously, but not required.El Guapo wrote:Oh, and withdraw Newcastle
.
Are we still requiring the withdrawal of accusations? Seems like a lot of people just accuse another person without withdrawing previous accusations.
Unagi wrote:(I'm in a training class this entire week)
Chaosraven wrote:I am S00per Sekrit Sneaky Agent Man. But as my name hits MANY lists, I don't think "flying under the radar" is applicable.redrun wrote:Chaos is trending towards fluff... so, it's normal for Chaos to spend a lot of time in the fluff zone, but normally he comes out of it at some point. Hey Chaos - who is being too quiet this game day? Who is flying under the radar? I'd just like to see something solid from you to look at.
So here you go.
total nonwolfraven wrote:It's not me, dude.
Weird.redrun wrote:Chaosraven wrote:I am S00per Sekrit Sneaky Agent Man. But as my name hits MANY lists, I don't think "flying under the radar" is applicable.redrun wrote:Chaos is trending towards fluff... so, it's normal for Chaos to spend a lot of time in the fluff zone, but normally he comes out of it at some point. Hey Chaos - who is being too quiet this game day? Who is flying under the radar? I'd just like to see something solid from you to look at.
So here you go.
total nonwolfraven wrote:It's not me, dude.![]()
I wasn't accusing you of flying under radar, I was asking you to analyize the other players.
Let's try again. I think there are a number of players using Suuper CEEcrit C0D3s in this game, some based on frequency and fluffyness of posting. Do you think you can find these codes?
But why Remus?El Guapo wrote:!edoc ym kcarc lliw eno oN
Because everyone likes to point at me. I'm the default member of all evil lists right now. Guapo just didn't want to be left out.Vorret wrote:But why Remus?El Guapo wrote:!edoc ym kcarc lliw eno oN
No, you might be on to something.Chaosraven wrote:Oh wait.
That big old glaring 17 Villagers left.
Nevermind.
A slip? Did someone find a slip? <shrug> I always hate making something out of these things. But how many wolves have we netted because of mistakes like this?pr0ner wrote:No, you might be on to something.Chaosraven wrote:Oh wait.
That big old glaring 17 Villagers left.
Nevermind.
Stessier mentions 17 VILLAGERS left alive when setting his deadline.
Triggercut mentions 17 PLAYERS.
There is a difference.
It's not really better logic.RMC wrote:A slip? Did someone find a slip? <shrug> I always hate making something out of these things. But how many wolves have we netted because of mistakes like this?pr0ner wrote:No, you might be on to something.Chaosraven wrote:Oh wait.
That big old glaring 17 Villagers left.
Nevermind.
Stessier mentions 17 VILLAGERS left alive when setting his deadline.
Triggercut mentions 17 PLAYERS.
There is a difference.
I am willing to switch to Triggercut, it is certainly better logic than my current logic on why I am voting for redrun.
Well no it's not, if you want to get all technical. But it is a different guess with different reasoning.El Guapo wrote:It's not really better logic.RMC wrote:A slip? Did someone find a slip? <shrug> I always hate making something out of these things. But how many wolves have we netted because of mistakes like this?pr0ner wrote:No, you might be on to something.Chaosraven wrote:Oh wait.
That big old glaring 17 Villagers left.
Nevermind.
Stessier mentions 17 VILLAGERS left alive when setting his deadline.
Triggercut mentions 17 PLAYERS.
There is a difference.
I am willing to switch to Triggercut, it is certainly better logic than my current logic on why I am voting for redrun.
No, but it's something I'd act on.El Guapo wrote:It's not really better logic.RMC wrote:A slip? Did someone find a slip? <shrug> I always hate making something out of these things. But how many wolves have we netted because of mistakes like this?pr0ner wrote:No, you might be on to something.Chaosraven wrote:Oh wait.
That big old glaring 17 Villagers left.
Nevermind.
Stessier mentions 17 VILLAGERS left alive when setting his deadline.
Triggercut mentions 17 PLAYERS.
There is a difference.
I am willing to switch to Triggercut, it is certainly better logic than my current logic on why I am voting for redrun.
[Best game show announcer voice]Ooohhh, thank you for playing. It was "he's Empire, obviously" that we were looking for. Tell Chaosraven what he could have won, Remus.[/Best game show announcer voice]Chaosraven wrote:He's Cylon, obviously.
Some has taken Newcastle's banter as something wolfy. I think it's neither. It might even be wolf-bait.Newcastle wrote:night has fallen
arguments persist
game is afoot
You know what? This sentiment seems genuine. If it's a wolfy move, it's a very good one - if Unagi posted this as a wolf, he is pre-empting suspicion that may come up towards him later in the game, which is enormously far-fetched. A wolf would never be seanced by the medium.Unagi wrote:I think that's why I don't like it. I don't want to have to keep up after I die but if the Medium contacts you, you are going to want to have something... but most likely - they won't, so keeping up will be sorta a waste.Remus West wrote:I like it because then you can follow along and speculate regarding current events even if you have been killed. Then if you get contacted by the Medium you can share your thoughts. It allows everyone to play until the end (or the use of the Medium).Unagi wrote:I just realized that we will not be told crap on death, because of the medium.
While that's fun - it's also not.
I'd rather just be spoiled. That being said - I love having a medium in the game, cause it's cool to be able to hear from someone that would have normally been 'silenced' by their death.
So, I like the game piece - I just don't like waiting.
This on the other hand, seems fake, contrived & opportune. Many people submits night orders, not just wolves.El Guapo wrote:How hard is it to choose a kill on night zero? Is it who tells the funniest joke in the village? The least funny joke?
Vorret strikes me as weird too. Too jolly on page 2, which betrays concern about his possibly impending doom. I'm sorting him as "defensive".Vorret wrote:I saw they should take the first name in the list, AKA not me.El Guapo wrote:How hard is it to choose a kill on night zero? Is it who tells the funniest joke in the village? The least funny joke?
This is the second time in the thread that Lassr claims (night-time) to be "submitting orders". That means he's either an unpowered villager, clumsily trying to get night-killed, or a good special trying to double-bluff, or a wolf trying to joke. I'll be watching Lassr's behavior to see if there is any consistency.Lassr wrote:So you know for a fact the wolves are holding up the game?El Guapo wrote:How hard is it to choose a kill on night zero? Is it who tells the funniest joke in the village? The least funny joke?![]()
Possibly true, my orders are in though...
Vorret wrote: Newcastle
Vorret wrote:Am I too soon?
At least one of those smilies is insincere.Vorret wrote:triggercut wrote:Night has fallen...
...and it can't get up!
An odd thing to say, but it's aggressive.bb2112 wrote:RMC, who do you think are the wolves?
Ah, right, So that's the follow-up to his previous question. Removing him from aggressive bracket.bb2112 wrote:Ok, I will not be voting for Remus, Chaosraven or myself today. Thanks!RMC wrote:Remus, BB2112, ChaosRaven are my top three guesses. Followed by everyone else not named RMC.bb2112 wrote:RMC, who do you think are the wolves?
Oh, I think that Holman is not a wolf.
That's about all I got. Who do you think is a wolf?![]()
Lord Mortis
He is going to beg for death sooner or later and I feel in a generous mood.
Re-reading this post, it goddamn stinks. He throws out a lengthy hypothesis that says nothing. It begins with "Hmm" and ends with "Yeah, I got nothing." This, folks, is non-committal & manipulative. He's trying to look like he's contributing but is in reality saying nothing, not digging.triggercut wrote:Hmm. Possible that Holman was a Grundbegriff "I can't read this guy, so let's get rid of him" first night kill. See: Lite, Lagom.
Equally possible that the wolves want us to think that, so they chose Holman for that reason.
Also possible that Grundbegriff would be smart enough to know that we'd think of this and thus chose Holman, thinking we'd think he'd been framed.
Just as possible that the badguys knew that we'd think Grundbegriff would be smart enough to think he'd been framed....
Yeah, I got nothing.
Now, a proper response to my question would be to question my motives. triggercut instead elects to defend himself. It's also flattery, which is manipulative.triggercut wrote:Nope. Just remembering from another game where Grund or Unagi or Lassr or someone said that you were their wildcard, the hardest player for them to read.Lagom Lite wrote:? I don't think Grundbegriff has any trouble reading me. And if he does, why not kill me.triggercut wrote:Hmm. Possible that Holman was a Grundbegriff "I can't read this guy, so let's get rid of him" first night kill. See: Lite, Lagom.
You're trying something, aren't you.
I kind of like this line by pr0ner...pr0ner wrote:It was Holman because Scoop didn't want to kill me on back to back Night Zeros.Unagi wrote:Why Holman ? Weren't you supposed to hammer us with that, Newcastle? in verse.
I kind of like this line by Qantaga... it's extroverted, aggressive.Qantaga wrote:Lassr wrote: Only wolves read all the rules...
We've caught more that one wolf red-handed who displayed that they absolutely did not read the rules.
This is very constructive by Remus.Remus West wrote:The only thing I take from it is to see how folks react to him. Information which is useless to me currently. I think maybe I'll try and fix that issue.Lagom Lite wrote:I kind of enjoy it!
Newcastle
I'm not fond of the long posts of what ifs that have no chance of being tested but this gives us the same level of nothing regarding his thoughts on others and less regarding him. May as well start there.
Aggression by Remus, which is good. Says little about Qantaga really, but the sentiment seems pure.Remus West wrote:This is twisting that situation. Before that post bb2112 had asked RMC to list his suspects. bb2112 was merely poking fun at RMC as "always wrong". Why twist that into a conflict on his usual behavior rather than taking it as the joke it was pretty obvious he was attempting to make?Qantaga wrote:bb2112 wrote: Ok, I will not be voting for Remus, Chaosraven (or myself) today.
This is in direct conflict with your usual Day 1 philosophy.
Qantaga's reply is equally aggressive, and regards others much more than himself.Qantaga wrote:Remus West wrote:This is twisting that situation. Before that post bb2112 had asked RMC to list his suspects. bb2112 was merely poking fun at RMC as "always wrong". Why twist that into a conflict on his usual behavior rather than taking it as the joke it was pretty obvious he was attempting to make?Qantaga wrote:bb2112 wrote: Ok, I will not be voting for Remus, Chaosraven (or myself) today.
This is in direct conflict with your usual Day 1 philosophy.
It's not twisting at all, especially given that RMC proved definitively last game that he is not always wrong.
In the past, bb has always expressed "pleasure" in voting for you or Chaos, yet now he (jokingly or otherwise) states that he will not vote for either of you.
I also find it interesting that you are answering for him.
The normal Chaos/bb/Remus (and on the periphery LM/redrun) "It will be funny to see one of them go before me" game condition has seemingly been checked at the door this game.
Strikes me as a little bit defensive, if in a Scoopish way.Scoop20906 wrote:LOL, you are completely wrong about that. LOLpr0ner wrote:It was Holman because Scoop didn't want to kill me on back to back Night Zeros.Unagi wrote:Why Holman ? Weren't you supposed to hammer us with that, Newcastle? in verse.