Page 14 of 60
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 1:42 pm
by LordMortis
If you're saying what I think you're saying then you/we would be better off with having had the brother with votes on him coming out than having you come out.
At the same time, I think it's an interesting play and one I'm williing to go with, if only because you are saying there are two bothers in your good group.
withdraw theo
if I have to go with you list then I like Vorret
best, I think.
Now the question is, is best for the whole cabal to come out after waiting for a dispute (which I don't see coming).
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 1:43 pm
by theohall
Lagom Lite wrote:
wrote stuff
Lagom Lite wrote:Maybe, baby:
triggercut?
purge?
Newcastle?
LordMortis?
Vorret?
Bad guys:
El Guapo
Scoop20906
Chaosraven
Bakhtosh
Looks like a very interesting play. I still don't trust bb2112 or Unagi, though. Will leave my vote on triggercut for the various reasons others have posted in addition to his reactions.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 1:46 pm
by triggercut
Guess I better do this:
withdraw Lagom Lite
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 1:47 pm
by triggercut
The theohall quandary: is he theo, just being theo and being totally unmoveable from any ridiculous position he takes in a game...
...or is he play acting as himself?
Screw it.
theohall
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 1:48 pm
by Lagom Lite
LordMortis wrote:If you're saying what I think you're saying then you/we would be better off with having had the brother with votes on him coming out than having you come out.
They may have votes on them, they may not. I came out because people would otherwise question my motives, and I just made myself a point of discussion by going back through the thread as much as I did, claiming these guys are good and those aren't. I want to avoid that.
LordMortis wrote:At the same time, I think it's an interesting play and one I'm williing to go with, if only because you are saying there are two bothers in your good group.
They're not that bothersome.
LordMortis wrote:Now the question is, is best for the whole cabal to come out after waiting for a dispute (which I don't see coming).
Nope, they're better off hidden and there's no need for them to come forward. Even if the wolves kill me tonight one of my brothers could step forward and you could trust him implicitly (since you know there are currently two alive + me, if I'm dead tomorrow there are still two Cabalists who could dispute a wolf Cabalist claim).
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 1:48 pm
by Vorret
Interesting.
Can't risk voting redrun in that case.
withdraw redrun
slippery slip
Triggercut
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 1:54 pm
by Qantaga
Withdraw Lagom Lite
Re-reading...
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 1:56 pm
by triggercut
Based on Lagom's list, I guess I had better withdraw theohall
Instead,
Vorret
He's train-jumping.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 1:57 pm
by tru1cy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f088b/f088b1ce865ef3c355859c67bfa93f7521cfa2c2" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
really...
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 1:59 pm
by Vorret
triggercut wrote:Based on Lagom's list, I guess I had better withdraw theohall
Instead,
Vorret
He's train-jumping.
Train jumping?
Redrun is in LL good list who may contain another member of the Cabal, why would I risk lynching him?
Actually, now that you say that, I'm also voting for you for train jumping , as of now.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:00 pm
by triggercut
Vorret wrote:triggercut wrote:Based on Lagom's list, I guess I had better withdraw theohall
Instead,
Vorret
He's train-jumping.
Train jumping?
Redrun is in LL good list who may contain another member of the Cabal, why would I risk lynching him?
Actually, now that you say that, I'm also voting for you for train jumping , as of now.
Would you care to introduce some logic to this?
Redrun what?
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:01 pm
by tru1cy
sheesh, withdraw redrun
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:03 pm
by Vorret
triggercut wrote:Vorret wrote:triggercut wrote:Based on Lagom's list, I guess I had better withdraw theohall
Instead,
Vorret
He's train-jumping.
Train jumping?
Redrun is in LL good list who may contain another member of the Cabal, why would I risk lynching him?
Actually, now that you say that, I'm also voting for you for train jumping , as of now.
Would you care to introduce some logic to this?
Redrun what?
Lagom says his good list contains other Cabal.
Redrun is in his good list.
Part 2 :
You remove your vote for LL
Vote for Theo
Vote for me
I change my vote
You call me for train jumping
But who was logic?
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:05 pm
by triggercut
Vorret wrote:triggercut wrote:Vorret wrote:triggercut wrote:Based on Lagom's list, I guess I had better withdraw theohall
Instead,
Vorret
He's train-jumping.
Train jumping?
Redrun is in LL good list who may contain another member of the Cabal, why would I risk lynching him?
Actually, now that you say that, I'm also voting for you for train jumping , as of now.
Would you care to introduce some logic to this?
Redrun what?
Lagom says his good list contains other Cabal.
Redrun is in his good list.
Part 2 :
You remove your vote for LL
Vote for Theo
Vote for me
I change my vote
You call me for train jumping
But who was logic?
You seem to have me confused with tru1cy. Until I responded to your post, I'm not sure I've even typed redrun's name in this thread, and if so I certainly have never accused him of anything.
Your dismay is showing, Vorret.
It's ok. You can tell us. You're a wolf.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:07 pm
by Vorret
triggercut wrote:Vorret wrote:triggercut wrote:Vorret wrote:triggercut wrote:Based on Lagom's list, I guess I had better withdraw theohall
Instead,
Vorret
He's train-jumping.
Train jumping?
Redrun is in LL good list who may contain another member of the Cabal, why would I risk lynching him?
Actually, now that you say that, I'm also voting for you for train jumping , as of now.
Would you care to introduce some logic to this?
Redrun what?
Lagom says his good list contains other Cabal.
Redrun is in his good list.
Part 2 :
You remove your vote for LL
Vote for Theo
Vote for me
I change my vote
You call me for train jumping
But who was logic?
You seem to have me confused with tru1cy. Until I responded to your post, I'm not sure I've even typed redrun's name in this thread, and if so I certainly have never accused him of anything.
Your dismay is showing, Vorret.
It's ok. You can tell us. You're a wolf.
I'm not confused.
You vote for me because I'm train jumping when you're jumping even more than I am!
I changed my vote from Redrun to You (for the reason stated above) and strangely you decide to vote for me right after I do that.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:09 pm
by Remus West
I don't like your play LL. Well, I guess I more do not like your timing of it.
withdraw redrun
I do not doubt your claim as they are not going to try faking a group and a single Cabal member outed to counter you would be a poor trade for them if you were lying but I do not like this. You just cut off too many avenues of discussion.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe313/fe313fd80d67ede6e23f483863402310d735654b" alt="Confused :?"
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:09 pm
by tru1cy
Conspiracy theory – Lagom Lite could be the Bezerker and if another player pops up claiming Cabal and discredit LL and we decide to vote him down he could zerk on the Seer if they scanned him on night 0. Highly unlikely, but I don’t like this play of early exposure on a special that was hardly garnering much attention, imo
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:13 pm
by triggercut
tru1cy wrote:Conspiracy theory – Lagom Lite could be the Bezerker and if another player pops up claiming Cabal and discredit LL and we decide to vote him down he could zerk on the Seer if they scanned him on night 0. Highly unlikely, but I don’t like this play of early exposure on a special that was hardly garnering much attention, imo
The wolves cannot afford to do 1:1 trades with villagers this early in the game.
I put the likelihood of LL being the Zerker at a number approaching zero.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:13 pm
by LordMortis
tru1cy wrote:Conspiracy theory – Lagom Lite could be the Bezerker and if another player pops up claiming Cabal and discredit LL and we decide to vote him down he could zerk on the Seer if they scanned him on night 0. Highly unlikely, but I don’t like this play of early exposure on a special that was hardly garnering much attention, imo
Let someone come out and contradict LL. I'll be happy to risk exchanging a Cabal for a wolf today. We could even cut them to quick and trade 3 for 3.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:14 pm
by triggercut
Vorret wrote:
I'm not confused.
You vote for me because I'm train jumping when you're jumping even more than I am!
I changed my vote from Redrun to You (for the reason stated above) and strangely you decide to vote for me right after I do that.
There we go! I knew if we fished this pond long enough, I'd get an explanation I understood.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:15 pm
by tru1cy
triggercut wrote:tru1cy wrote:Conspiracy theory – Lagom Lite could be the Bezerker and if another player pops up claiming Cabal and discredit LL and we decide to vote him down he could zerk on the Seer if they scanned him on night 0. Highly unlikely, but I don’t like this play of early exposure on a special that was hardly garnering much attention, imo
The wolves cannot afford to do 1:1 trades with villagers this early in the game.
I put the likelihood of LL being the Zerker at a number approaching zero.
I said highly unlikely.. probably more annoyed at the early reveal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aca67/aca67bfb9e72d474c76f98c444f72ee63c50d518" alt="Cat Fight! :tjg:"
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:18 pm
by Lassr
withdraw redrun
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:24 pm
by Unagi
I think that was a good play , LL. Earlier, I had also thought how it may be good for a single cabal to step forward.
I assume Holman was not one of the cabal.
And... Since one of my biggest aversion to this vote was that you (pre-claim) were also interested in it; I'm suddenly pretty OK with it.
Scoop
Re: 8 DAY WARNING
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:26 pm
by triggercut
stessier wrote:Day 1 Vote Count
Votes required for lynch - 11
Against redrun (6) - Lassr, Remus, RMC, Bakhtosh, tru1cy, Vorret
Against Qantaga (3) - redrun, bb2112, Chaosraven
Against theohall (3) - Unagi, LordMortis, El Guapo
Against triggercut (2) - pr0ner, Scoop20906
Against El Guapo (1) - Lagom Lite
Against Scoop (1) - triggercut
Against Grundbegriff (1) - Newcastle
Against Lagom LIte (1) - Qantaga
Against bb2112 (1) - theohall
No votes - Purge, Grundbegriff
There are 17 villagers alive. The deadline for the lynch vote is June 6th at 9pm Eastern time.
Now then, Vorret.
Describe for me the "train" I've just jumped on that involves you.
Does it look like this?
(That is, where are the other cars in this alleged "train"?)
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:27 pm
by Unagi
LordMortis wrote:tru1cy wrote:Conspiracy theory – Lagom Lite could be the Bezerker and if another player pops up claiming Cabal and discredit LL and we decide to vote him down he could zerk on the Seer if they scanned him on night 0. Highly unlikely, but I don’t like this play of early exposure on a special that was hardly garnering much attention, imo
Let someone come out and contradict LL. I'll be happy to risk exchanging a Cabal for a wolf today. We could even cut them to quick and trade 3 for 3.
If LL is countered, it would be great. And I would suggest the seer then scanned either and the hunter shoot based on results, etc.
But that is NOT going to happen.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:30 pm
by Unagi
Remus West wrote:
I do not doubt your claim as they are not going to try faking a group and a single Cabal member outed to counter you would be a poor trade for them if you were lying but I do not like this. You just cut off too many avenues of discussion.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe313/fe313fd80d67ede6e23f483863402310d735654b" alt="Confused :?"
I disagree. Doing this early actually helps, IMO.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:31 pm
by El Guapo
Vorret wrote:Interesting.
Can't risk voting redrun in that case.
withdraw redrun
slippery slip
Triggercut
"Slippery slip", eh?
Re: 8 DAY WARNING
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:32 pm
by Vorret
triggercut wrote:stessier wrote:Day 1 Vote Count
Votes required for lynch - 11
Against redrun (6) - Lassr, Remus, RMC, Bakhtosh, tru1cy, Vorret
Against Qantaga (3) - redrun, bb2112, Chaosraven
Against theohall (3) - Unagi, LordMortis, El Guapo
Against triggercut (2) - pr0ner, Scoop20906
Against El Guapo (1) - Lagom Lite
Against Scoop (1) - triggercut
Against Grundbegriff (1) - Newcastle
Against Lagom LIte (1) - Qantaga
Against bb2112 (1) - theohall
No votes - Purge, Grundbegriff
There are 17 villagers alive. The deadline for the lynch vote is June 6th at 9pm Eastern time.
Now then, Vorret.
Describe for me the "train" I've just jumped on that involves you.
Does it look like this?
(That is, where are the other cars in this alleged "train"?)
I'm now officially confused, what am I supposed to look at here in the vote tally?
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:33 pm
by El Guapo
LordMortis wrote:tru1cy wrote:Conspiracy theory – Lagom Lite could be the Bezerker and if another player pops up claiming Cabal and discredit LL and we decide to vote him down he could zerk on the Seer if they scanned him on night 0. Highly unlikely, but I don’t like this play of early exposure on a special that was hardly garnering much attention, imo
Let someone come out and contradict LL. I'll be happy to risk exchanging a Cabal for a wolf today. We could even cut them to quick and trade 3 for 3.
They might do that to kill the seer, but if they've scanned the seer already (itself unlikely) I assume they'd just kill him quietly in the night. No real need to do the zerker trade to kill the seer.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:35 pm
by Vorret
El Guapo wrote:Vorret wrote:Interesting.
Can't risk voting redrun in that case.
withdraw redrun
slippery slip
Triggercut
"Slippery slip", eh?
I like the way it rolls off the tongue
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:35 pm
by El Guapo
Unagi wrote:I think that was a good play , LL. Earlier, I had also thought how it may be good for a single cabal to step forward.
I assume Holman was not one of the cabal.
And... Since one of my biggest aversion to this vote was that you (pre-claim) were also interested in it; I'm suddenly pretty OK with it.
Scoop
In fact, LL has said that both of the other cabal members are alive, so Holman was not a cabalist.
Hey...why wasn't I invited to join the cabal?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53dae/53daeef55825ba831898ace595c7f508cb3fa332" alt="Crying or Very Sad :cry:"
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:38 pm
by Lagom Lite
El Guapo wrote:Unagi wrote:I think that was a good play , LL. Earlier, I had also thought how it may be good for a single cabal to step forward.
I assume Holman was not one of the cabal.
And... Since one of my biggest aversion to this vote was that you (pre-claim) were also interested in it; I'm suddenly pretty OK with it.
Scoop
In fact, LL has said that both of the other cabal members are alive, so Holman was not a cabalist.
Hey...why wasn't I invited to join the cabal?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53dae/53daeef55825ba831898ace595c7f508cb3fa332" alt="Crying or Very Sad :cry:"
We didn't think you'd be interested in the initiation rite. It involves spending five minutes with me in closet.
Also, you use words we don't understand and are therefore evil.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:42 pm
by El Guapo
Lagom Lite wrote:
Also, you use words we don't understand and are therefore evil.
I could learn Swedish!
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:47 pm
by triggercut
Vorret wrote:
Actually, now that you say that, I'm also voting for you for train jumping , as of now.
When I think of "train jumping", it is a wolf who is hopping aboard a vote train against a villager (like me) in an attempt to help get that goodguy lynched while hiding amongst others.
There are already multiple votes on me. Not many, but a few.
I saw your vote on me as jumping on that train.
I am now, and remain, the sole vote against you.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:49 pm
by redrun
Lagom Lite wrote:
I am the Grand Master of the Cabal.
It would take a fool for this to be a fake, and Lagom is not a fool.
I'll be busy today, but I'll get an updated threat list out and a new vote by end of day Friday (hopefully sooner).
I think this play has some useful possibilities - I'm interested to see where it leads.
Withdraw Qantaga
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:49 pm
by Vorret
triggercut wrote:Vorret wrote:
Actually, now that you say that, I'm also voting for you for train jumping , as of now.
When I think of "train jumping", it is a wolf who is hopping aboard a vote train against a villager (like me) in an attempt to help get that goodguy lynched while hiding amongst others.
There are already multiple votes on me. Not many, but a few.
I saw your vote on me as jumping on that train.
I am now, and remain, the sole vote against you.
Ahhh, I see, I read it as someone who changes his vote multiple times. Makes more sense now.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:50 pm
by Vorret
Oh and you're not alone, LM is your vote buddy
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:50 pm
by LordMortis
El Guapo wrote:Hey...why wasn't I invited to join the cabal?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53dae/53daeef55825ba831898ace595c7f508cb3fa332" alt="Crying or Very Sad :cry:"
Does it have anything to do with the Sonic Chicken Club?
....
And on a different note I had assumed there were going cabalists in the silent club (aka LLs maybe list). The only silent who passed LLs trial was Grund. Which makes the grund on again off again interesting. Only the people that puppydogged Grund on the LLs on again off again vote are all leaning goods.
theohall wd Grund (3)
tru1cy wd Grund (2)
Lagom wd Grund (1)
/very much wishes theo wasn't on LLs good list.
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:52 pm
by LordMortis
redrun wrote:It would take a fool for this to be a fake, and Lagom is not a fool.
Why does that sound like a Shakespearean insult? Are you still caught in Newcastle's lyric?
Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 1
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:53 pm
by Remus West
Unagi wrote:Remus West wrote:
I do not doubt your claim as they are not going to try faking a group and a single Cabal member outed to counter you would be a poor trade for them if you were lying but I do not like this. You just cut off too many avenues of discussion.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe313/fe313fd80d67ede6e23f483863402310d735654b" alt="Confused :?"
I disagree. Doing this early actually helps, IMO.
Really? So with a week to go before the dealine rather than waiting until folks had been online to look at his posts he goes from causing a big splash (I like that part of the play) to explaining the splash before anyone gets wet and we can detect the bad guys by the smell of wet dog.
Lagom is handing us a known as no wolf is going to fake Cabal day 1. Yet he had plenty of time to do so and still allow a trap to develop.
I'd vote Unagi right now but he is part of "the group" I can not longer vote for since 20% of them are Cabal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe313/fe313fd80d67ede6e23f483863402310d735654b" alt="Confused :?"
Also, I have first hand knowledge of how poorly it works to follow the "known" in this ruleset.
I'm debating asking the rest of the Cabal to come out. If they do then the Seer knows he doesn't need scan them. The Hunter can try protecting one of them as long as an odd number are alive (don't do it when there are 2 because if you guess wrong then the wolves will get the third right away although they won't know if you guessed wrong or not so....). Then we can go ahead and lynch whomever we want rather than be hemmed in.